{"component": "clause", "props": {"groups": [{"size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-customer", "type": "definition", "offset": [68, 80]}, {"key": "requirements-for", "type": "clause", "offset": [96, 112]}, {"key": "operating-system", "type": "definition", "offset": [135, 151]}, {"key": "vendor-will", "type": "clause", "offset": [182, 193]}, {"key": "final-approval", "type": "clause", "offset": [199, 213]}, {"key": "requirements-and-specifications", "type": "clause", "offset": [223, 254]}], "snippet": "If Customer is utilizing Comparative Analysis, Vendor requires that the Customer meets Vendor\u2019s requirements for a currently supported Operating System and a spatially accurate map. Vendor will have final approval in those requirements and specifications.", "samples": [{"hash": "6XwX88KQ5fa", "uri": "/contracts/6XwX88KQ5fa#comparative-analysis", "label": "Public Education Agreement", "score": 31.7752952576, "published": true}, {"hash": "8SAz44nc5CM", "uri": "/contracts/8SAz44nc5CM#comparative-analysis", "label": "Public Education Agreement", "score": 30.8095321655, "published": true}], "hash": "ce0ce2ef41b9f0de9c171f5e8c30b937", "id": 1}, {"size": 1, "snippet_links": [{"key": "time-schedule", "type": "definition", "offset": [25, 38]}, {"key": "project-analysis", "type": "definition", "offset": [162, 178]}, {"key": "collection-of-data", "type": "clause", "offset": [183, 201]}, {"key": "referring-to", "type": "definition", "offset": [202, 214]}, {"key": "state-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [223, 231]}, {"key": "research-deliverables", "type": "clause", "offset": [232, 253]}], "snippet": "2.2.1 Initial and actual time schedule Deliverables Initially scheduled Actually accom- plished Deliverables Initially scheduled Actually accom- plished TASK C - PROJECT ANALYSIS AND COLLECTION OF DATA REFERRING TO CURRENT STATE OF RESEARCH Deliverables Initially scheduled Actually accom- plished Deliverables Initially scheduled Actually accom- plished Deliverables Initially scheduled Actually accom- plished Deliverables Initially scheduled Actually accom- plished", "samples": [{"hash": "g5Fu6uYxU3u", "uri": "/contracts/g5Fu6uYxU3u#comparative-analysis", "label": "Grant Agreement", "score": 24.1726093292, "published": true}], "hash": "94a34e19f704eaef51da2023c9e171e5", "id": 7}, {"size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "section-vii", "type": "clause", "offset": [0, 11]}, {"key": "proposed-solution", "type": "clause", "offset": [66, 83]}, {"key": "the-proposed-scheme", "type": "clause", "offset": [91, 110]}, {"key": "the-work", "type": "definition", "offset": [128, 136]}], "snippet": "Section VII is dedicated to present a comparative analysis of the proposed solution. Here, the proposed scheme is compared with the work done by \u2587\u2587\u2587 et al. [51], \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 et al. [53], \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 et al. [42] and \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 et al. [54].", "samples": [{"hash": "e9x49qE6Szm", "uri": "/contracts/e9x49qE6Szm#comparative-analysis", "label": "Certificate Based Access Control and Key Agreement Scheme", "score": 25.094455719, "published": true}, {"hash": "aafUISsLArX", "uri": "/contracts/aafUISsLArX#comparative-analysis", "label": "Certificate Based Access Control and Key Agreement Scheme", "score": 25.0109519958, "published": true}], "hash": "926883dc080ad79015b3f3056c8dd6a0", "id": 2}, {"size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "receipt-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [10, 20]}, {"key": "oral-presentations", "type": "clause", "offset": [42, 60]}, {"key": "completion-of-evaluation", "type": "clause", "offset": [67, 91]}, {"key": "eligible-individual", "type": "definition", "offset": [100, 119]}, {"key": "the-government", "type": "clause", "offset": [139, 153]}, {"key": "the-requirements", "type": "clause", "offset": [289, 305]}, {"key": "based-on", "type": "definition", "offset": [307, 315]}], "snippet": "Following receipt of responses (including oral presentations), and completion of evaluation of each eligible individual Quoter\u2019s response, the Government may perform a comparative analysis (comparing Quoter responses to one another) to select the Quoter(s) that are best suited to fulfill the requirements, based on the Quoters\u2019 responses to the factors outlined in this RFQ and their relative importance.", "samples": [{"hash": "7G4TkUQYz59", "uri": "/contracts/7G4TkUQYz59#comparative-analysis", "label": "Blanket Purchase Agreement (Bpa)", "score": 30.5962505341, "published": true}, {"hash": "kpaOPIvVQsx", "uri": "/contracts/kpaOPIvVQsx#comparative-analysis", "label": "Blanket Purchase Agreement (Bpa)", "score": 30.4808921814, "published": true}], "hash": "e928f209096edfb9bce09f569ae7571a", "id": 3}, {"size": 1, "snippet_links": [{"key": "substantial-amount", "type": "definition", "offset": [47, 65]}, {"key": "south-asia", "type": "clause", "offset": [188, 198]}, {"key": "similar-to", "type": "definition", "offset": [447, 457]}, {"key": "to-provide", "type": "clause", "offset": [503, 513]}, {"key": "the-conflict", "type": "definition", "offset": [689, 701]}, {"key": "new-york", "type": "clause", "offset": [912, 920]}, {"key": "field-of-play", "type": "definition", "offset": [1241, 1254]}, {"key": "in-addition", "type": "clause", "offset": [1430, 1441]}, {"key": "to-attend", "type": "clause", "offset": [1477, 1486]}, {"key": "attention-to", "type": "definition", "offset": [1577, 1589]}, {"key": "the-performance", "type": "clause", "offset": [1590, 1605]}, {"key": "to-assume", "type": "clause", "offset": [1906, 1915]}, {"key": "to-act", "type": "definition", "offset": [2043, 2049]}, {"key": "public-school", "type": "definition", "offset": [2079, 2092]}, {"key": "roman-catholic", "type": "definition", "offset": [2548, 2562]}, {"key": "entry-point", "type": "definition", "offset": [2721, 2732]}, {"key": "chapter-two", "type": "definition", "offset": [2764, 2775]}, {"key": "the-university", "type": "clause", "offset": [2888, 2902]}, {"key": "chapter-three", "type": "definition", "offset": [3245, 3258]}], "snippet": "In most chapters of this dissertation, I use a substantial amount of comparative material. Most of this is drawn from feminist ethnographies of women in contemporary societies in West and South Asia. I also use material evidence, including textiles, inscriptions, and funerary art, from the imperial and late Roman eras. While I name this section \u2018Comparative Analysis\u2019, I do not use the ethnographic and art historical material to show something similar to modesty in the Christian ascetic context but to provide new ways of thinking about and looking at the ancient Christian texts. Conventional advice to be modest is barely interesting. However, highly detailed \u2018thick-description\u2019 of the conflict in a young woman\u2019s household over whether she can properly maintain modesty in a sari while also wearing a cardigan activates dull and 70 \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (New York, London: Routledge, 1999). 173. lifeless advice to be properly covered in public.71 Suddenly, \u2018properly covered\u2019 is not self-evident. Ethnographic evidence, with its intimate detail and multiplicity of particular cases, is an analytical lens that opens generic norms for feminine behavior into a wide and even dangerous field of play. It vividly reminds the reader that the seemingly static ideal of modest womanhood is made up of daily battles, the push and pull of cloth, the bite of neighbors\u2019 commentary. In addition, since ethnographic material tends to attend to the transitions between habitual activity and heightened social performances, it draws attention to the performance cues, or possible locations for them, in the ancient material. Another function of the ethnographic material is to further de-center a tacit understanding of person as Western, liberal person. To some extent we always draw analogies between our selves and our subjects when we do history. It is easy to assume that our subjects were the same sort of subjects we are, or think we are, or would like to be. Thus some ancient persons start to act and think a lot like British public school graduates and some like post-consciousness raising American feminists. Late ancient persons were certainly like us in some ways, unlike in more. The use of several different sorts of contemporary people as possible analogies for thinking about ancient Christians should make us more aware and critical of accidental assumptions of sameness or difference. It is useful to ask, along the way, if I have more in common with \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, as a practicing American Roman Catholic, or if a contemporary Hindu woman in an ashram does, as a practicing ascetic. The art historical evidence also serves, not so much as illustration, but as an entry point for historical imagination. In Chapter Two, the textile evidence aids the reader to 71 \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, Clothing Matters: Dress and Identity in India (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1996). 168-170. mentally touch and see the sorts of clothes being worn in the early fifth century. They cannot tell us exactly what such clothes looked like when worn\u2014any more than a stack of saris could--but can give some ideas as to the possibilities for many ways in which they were likely worn. The funerary evidence in Chapter Three functions as a way to break down conceptions of what counted as private, what as public, and how Romans maintained those spaces and categories.", "samples": [{"hash": "jVSvfHTBJbI", "uri": "/contracts/jVSvfHTBJbI#comparative-analysis", "label": "Distribution Agreement", "score": 19.0, "published": true}], "hash": "d19ada12f12cac8a17cced6a4943e116", "id": 4}, {"size": 1, "snippet_links": [{"key": "case-study", "type": "clause", "offset": [14, 24]}, {"key": "the-\u2587", "type": "clause", "offset": [103, 108]}, {"key": "the-agreements", "type": "clause", "offset": [185, 199]}, {"key": "and-address", "type": "clause", "offset": [293, 304]}, {"key": "water-rights", "type": "clause", "offset": [356, 368]}, {"key": "settlement-agreements", "type": "clause", "offset": [461, 482]}, {"key": "the-fact", "type": "clause", "offset": [581, 589]}, {"key": "local-people", "type": "definition", "offset": [642, 654]}, {"key": "amounts-of-water", "type": "clause", "offset": [745, 761]}, {"key": "to-provide", "type": "clause", "offset": [833, 843]}, {"key": "table-2", "type": "definition", "offset": [862, 869]}, {"key": "associated-with", "type": "definition", "offset": [905, 920]}, {"key": "case-studies", "type": "clause", "offset": [938, 950]}, {"key": "length-of-time", "type": "clause", "offset": [1197, 1211]}, {"key": "to-negotiate", "type": "definition", "offset": [1212, 1224]}, {"key": "quantity-of-water", "type": "clause", "offset": [1305, 1322]}, {"key": "native-american-lands", "type": "definition", "offset": [1343, 1364]}, {"key": "number-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [1726, 1735]}, {"key": "available-water", "type": "definition", "offset": [1941, 1956]}, {"key": "federal-funding", "type": "clause", "offset": [2148, 2163]}, {"key": "state-funding", "type": "clause", "offset": [2187, 2200]}, {"key": "local-government", "type": "clause", "offset": [2225, 2241]}, {"key": "total-government-funding", "type": "definition", "offset": [2266, 2290]}, {"key": "the-settlement", "type": "clause", "offset": [2318, 2332]}, {"key": "specific-circumstances", "type": "clause", "offset": [2432, 2454]}, {"key": "specific-provisions", "type": "definition", "offset": [2571, 2590]}, {"key": "contained-in", "type": "definition", "offset": [2591, 2603]}, {"key": "core-issues", "type": "definition", "offset": [2740, 2751]}, {"key": "property-rights", "type": "definition", "offset": [2822, 2837]}, {"key": "hydrologic-balance", "type": "definition", "offset": [2900, 2918]}, {"key": "renewable-supply", "type": "definition", "offset": [2964, 2980]}, {"key": "the-rights", "type": "clause", "offset": [3034, 3044]}, {"key": "consistent-with-the", "type": "clause", "offset": [3132, 3151]}, {"key": "water-projects", "type": "definition", "offset": [3464, 3478]}, {"key": "interstate-compact", "type": "definition", "offset": [3831, 3849]}, {"key": "compliance-issues", "type": "clause", "offset": [3850, 3867]}, {"key": "navajo-nation", "type": "definition", "offset": [3936, 3949]}, {"key": "city-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [4142, 4149]}, {"key": "santa-fe", "type": "definition", "offset": [4150, 4158]}, {"key": "details-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [4309, 4319]}, {"key": "core-content", "type": "definition", "offset": [4373, 4385]}, {"key": "scope-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [4474, 4482]}, {"key": "in-addition-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [4520, 4534]}, {"key": "provide-for", "type": "definition", "offset": [4594, 4605]}, {"key": "construction-of-water", "type": "clause", "offset": [4610, 4631]}, {"key": "measures-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [4645, 4656]}, {"key": "any-settlement", "type": "clause", "offset": [5143, 5157]}, {"key": "related-to", "type": "definition", "offset": [5158, 5168]}, {"key": "negative-outcome", "type": "definition", "offset": [5268, 5284]}, {"key": "time-and-expense", "type": "clause", "offset": [5325, 5341]}, {"key": "to-litigate", "type": "clause", "offset": [5369, 5380]}, {"key": "supply-of-water", "type": "clause", "offset": [5455, 5470]}, {"key": "the-problem", "type": "clause", "offset": [5537, 5548]}, {"key": "the-society", "type": "clause", "offset": [5675, 5686]}, {"key": "the-foundation", "type": "clause", "offset": [5799, 5813]}, {"key": "in-new-mexico", "type": "clause", "offset": [5842, 5855]}, {"key": "the-western", "type": "clause", "offset": [5860, 5871]}, {"key": "state-and-federal", "type": "definition", "offset": [5999, 6016]}, {"key": "negotiated-agreements", "type": "clause", "offset": [6152, 6173]}, {"key": "other-options", "type": "clause", "offset": [6194, 6207]}, {"key": "set-aside", "type": "clause", "offset": [6326, 6335]}, {"key": "in-favor-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [6336, 6347]}, {"key": "other-approaches", "type": "clause", "offset": [6348, 6364]}, {"key": "water-management", "type": "clause", "offset": [6433, 6449]}, {"key": "in-the-case", "type": "clause", "offset": [6522, 6533]}, {"key": "institutional-change", "type": "definition", "offset": [6563, 6583]}, {"key": "voluntary-agreements", "type": "clause", "offset": [6642, 6662]}, {"key": "in-\u2587", "type": "clause", "offset": [6726, 6730]}, {"key": "the-system", "type": "definition", "offset": [6793, 6803]}, {"key": "over-time", "type": "clause", "offset": [6816, 6825]}, {"key": "state-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [6829, 6837]}, {"key": "exceptions-to-the", "type": "clause", "offset": [7364, 7381]}, {"key": "use-it-or-lose-it", "type": "clause", "offset": [7402, 7419]}, {"key": "reliance-on", "type": "clause", "offset": [7585, 7596]}, {"key": "water-supplies", "type": "clause", "offset": [7709, 7723]}, {"key": "source-of-water", "type": "definition", "offset": [7740, 7755]}, {"key": "lack-of-adjudication", "type": "clause", "offset": [7819, 7839]}, {"key": "water-use", "type": "clause", "offset": [7853, 7862]}, {"key": "water-usage", "type": "clause", "offset": [7922, 7933]}, {"key": "climate-change", "type": "clause", "offset": [8045, 8059]}, {"key": "incomplete-information", "type": "clause", "offset": [8145, 8167]}, {"key": "the-resource", "type": "definition", "offset": [8174, 8186]}, {"key": "establishment-of-water", "type": "clause", "offset": [8257, 8279]}, {"key": "colorado-river", "type": "clause", "offset": [8354, 8368]}, {"key": "other-factors", "type": "clause", "offset": [8442, 8455]}, {"key": "consequences-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [8532, 8547]}, {"key": "long-run", "type": "definition", "offset": [8586, 8594]}, {"key": "applies-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [8818, 8828]}, {"key": "surface-water", "type": "definition", "offset": [8829, 8842]}, {"key": "renewable-resource", "type": "definition", "offset": [8866, 8884]}, {"key": "hydrologically-connected", "type": "definition", "offset": [8897, 8921]}, {"key": "groundwater-resources", "type": "definition", "offset": [8935, 8956]}, {"key": "the-requirements", "type": "clause", "offset": [9032, 9048]}, {"key": "with-respect-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [9207, 9222]}, {"key": "water-claims", "type": "definition", "offset": [9230, 9242]}, {"key": "environmental-problems", "type": "clause", "offset": [9325, 9347]}, {"key": "for-example", "type": "clause", "offset": [9349, 9360]}, {"key": "endangered-species-act", "type": "clause", "offset": [9468, 9490]}, {"key": "in-general", "type": "clause", "offset": [9577, 9587]}, {"key": "rate-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [9792, 9799]}, {"key": "water-consumption", "type": "clause", "offset": [9800, 9817]}], "snippet": "A comparative case study of the four settlements \u2013 the Lower Pecos, the San \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587-Navajo, the Taos, and the \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 \u2013 revealed that although there are significant underlying differences, the agreements have surprising and significant commonalities. All four of the agreements are highly complex and address long-standing entrenched conflicts. They stem from water rights adjudication processes that have been ongoing for decades. The adjudications and associated settlement agreements involve thousands of diverse litigants and stakeholders with a wide variety of interests. Despite the fact that the four agreements were negotiated largely by local people in different basins with substantially different local characteristics and widely varying amounts of water, the overarching outcomes of the settlements are surprisingly similar. To provide some perspective, Table 2 lists some introductory statistics associated with each of the four case studies. Each of the case studies involves water rights adjudication litigation that was filed decades ago, is highly complex, and remains incomplete. All four involve settlement agreements that were signed within a few years of each other, although the length of time to negotiate each settlement varied widely. The basins vary greatly in size, population, and quantity of water involved. There are Native American lands in each of the basins, but only three of the settlements involve tribes. Correspondingly, although all four settlements require significant government funding, funding from federal sources is provided only for the three settlements involving tribes. Table 2. Basic Statistics Lower Pecos San \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587- Navajo Taos \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 Year Adjudication Filed 1956 1975 1969 1966 Number of Water Rights Claimants ~2000+ ~18,000 ~7,000 ~3,000+ Year Settlement Signed 2003 2005 2006 2006 Population of Basin (in 2000) 139,000 97,000 16,000 11,000 Area of Basin (square miles) 16,777 9,762 524 200 Available Water in Basin (AF/yr)* 125,000 1,100,000 68,000 7,000 Water Rights Settled (AF/yr)* 56,000 326,000 ~65,000 ~7,000 Number of Tribes in Basin 1 3 1 4 Number of Tribes Involved in Settlement 0 1 1 4 Federal Funding ** 0 $820M $120M $170M State Funding** $100M+ $25M $14M $50M Local Government Funding** 0 $30M 0 $62M Total Government Funding** $100M+ $875M $134M $282M The settlement agreements are extremely complex documents, with a myriad of provisions and details addressing the specific circumstances in each basin and the particular interests of the stakeholders involved. Correspondingly, there is variation in the specific provisions contained in each settlement. However, despite the quite large differences in structure, language, and details, the settlements address very similar core issues. All four settlements, in one way or another are about: \u2022 determining property rights to water and the limits to these property rights; \u2022 achieving hydrologic balance (meaning water withdrawals do not exceed the renewable supply); \u2022 resolving over-allocation problems (meaning that the rights to water do not on average exceed the quantity of water available, or \u201cpaper water\u201d is consistent with the supply of \u201cwet water\u201d); \u2022 avoiding priority administration as a means for achieving hydrologic balance and/or resolving over-allocation problems; and \u2022 facilitating the leasing of water. In addition, as mechanisms both to achieve settlement and to resolve chronic problems, all four settlements rely on physical water projects and external government funding. Although certain agencies, such as the NM OSE, were involved in all of the settlements, the four agreements were negotiated largely by local people in different basins with substantially different local characteristics and widely varying amounts of water. The Lower Pecos is dominated by large irrigation districts and interstate compact compliance issues. Water in the San \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 is dominated by federal projects and a large Navajo Nation presence. The Taos basin has both a Pueblo and a large number of acequias competing with each other and a growing population. The NPT basin has four Pueblos and is located between the growing city of Santa Fe and Los Alamos National Laboratory, a situation with striking contrasts as well as development pressures. The language, organization, complexity, and details of each settlement are quite different, but much of the core content is strikingly similar. All four settlements contain provisions that are well beyond the scope of traditional litigated adjudications. In addition to clarifying property rights to water, all of the agreements provide for the construction of water projects and measures to balance demand with renewable supply. They also include provisions to facilitate the leasing of water, and they place heavy emphasis on avoiding priority administration. Thus, the settlements not only go beyond traditional litigations by \u201cenlarging the pie\u201d to create incentives to settle; they change how water will be managed. Although the details and circumstances vary, the fundamental motivations underlying each of the settlements are essentially the same. Perhaps as expected in any settlement related to a lawsuit, all expressly seek to eliminate uncertainty in outcomes (and avoid the possibility of a negative outcome) inherent in litigation and to save the time and expense associated with continuing to litigate. But, all four of the settlements also seek to resolve uncertainty in the supply of water, bring the associated basins into hydrologic balance, and address the problem that there are more water rights than there is water, all in a manner that does not cause severe disruption to the economy or the society. What is particularly interesting is that the settlements go to great lengths to avoid priority administration, the foundation of water law and management in New Mexico and the western U.S. To quote one eminent observer of the Pecos situation, \u201cPriority enforcement had switched from a centerpiece of New Mexico state and federal Pecos River Compact law to a threat whose consequences should be avoided at any cost.\u201d6 Why were these settlements necessary? Why were negotiated agreements pursued rather than other options to address entrenched over-allocation problems? Why in some key circumstances was the Doctrine of Prior Appropriation set aside in favor of other approaches to managing water? The following sections explain that the existing water management institutions are not well-suited for addressing the problems that exist in the case study basins, that wholesale institutional change would be very difficult if not impossible, and that these voluntary agreements were a way to overcome these challenges. 6 Quote by \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 in \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 2003, p. 60. When more water is allowed to be used than the system can support over time, a state of over- allocation exists. Also called over-appropriation, over-allocation is sometimes described as \u201cpaper water\u201d exceeding \u201cwet water.\u201d In the western U.S., over-allocation is related closely to how rigorously the Doctrine of Prior Appropriation is implemented, including the degree to which water rights under that system are monitored and enforced. It is also in many cases closely connected to the use of non- renewable groundwater. In New Mexico, water has become over-allocated as a result of a variety of factors. Legal exceptions to the beneficial-use (or \u201cuse it or lose it\u201d) requirement allow the considerable amounts of water associated with unused senior Indian rights (and to some extent unused municipal rights) to be used by others. Reliance on unsustainable groundwater pumping has allowed municipal populations to grow and become dependent on diminishing water supplies without a clear source of water once supplies run low. Lack of enforcement (due in part to the lack of adjudication) has enabled water use in excess of water rights. Climate variability has allowed water usage patterns to be established during wet periods, patterns that cannot be supported during normal or dry periods. Climate change is projected to further reduce water supplies in New Mexico (\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 and \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 2007). Incomplete information about the resource, such as the delayed effects of groundwater pumping on streams or the establishment of water rights during wet years (such as was done among the states that share the Colorado River) has also contributed to over- allocation. As a consequence of these and other factors, there are now substantially more rights to water than there is water.7 The consequences of over-allocation can be severe. In the long run, consuming water at a rate that exceeds the renewable supply means that it will run out at some point. This is of particular concern for communities and economies dependent on nonrenewable groundwater supplies, but it also applies to surface water (typically viewed as a renewable resource) when it is hydrologically connected to declining groundwater resources. A more immediate consequence of over-allocation is failure to comply with the requirements of interstate compacts and the associated need to make large adjustments in allocation quickly when the compacts are enforced; a similar situation will exist with respect to Indian water claims if and when they are quantified and enforced. Over-allocation also causes serious environmental problems. For example, depletion of groundwater can result in desertification and decline in interconnected surface water flows. Endangered Species Act issues may arise if streams are diverted to the point that critical habitats decline. In general, over-allocation increases uncertainty and conflict, and may result in potentially expensive litigation with unpredictable, potentially negative, outcomes.8 In an increasing number of basins, the current rate of water consumption cannot be sustained, and allowing over-allocation to persist is no longer an option.", "samples": [{"hash": "axJ1C7PX4ab", "uri": "/contracts/axJ1C7PX4ab#comparative-analysis", "label": "Water Rights Settlement Agreements", "score": 21.8390197754, "published": true}], "hash": "a34fa115892f8cde941c1a252c861f3f", "id": 5}, {"size": 1, "snippet_links": [{"key": "beginning-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [95, 107]}, {"key": "in-order-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [122, 133]}, {"key": "production-technology", "type": "definition", "offset": [285, 306]}, {"key": "process-and-product", "type": "clause", "offset": [386, 405]}, {"key": "marine-technology", "type": "definition", "offset": [568, 585]}, {"key": "number-of-ects", "type": "clause", "offset": [698, 712]}, {"key": "of-the-programme", "type": "clause", "offset": [713, 729]}, {"key": "total-no", "type": "clause", "offset": [866, 874]}, {"key": "timing-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [959, 968]}, {"key": "holiday-periods", "type": "definition", "offset": [1069, 1084]}, {"key": "selection-criteria", "type": "clause", "offset": [1089, 1107]}, {"key": "training-entity", "type": "definition", "offset": [1122, 1137]}, {"key": "business-partners", "type": "definition", "offset": [1215, 1232]}], "snippet": "In the following lines a comparative between different programmes is done. As mentioned at the beginning of this section, in order to compare the programmes developed in this project with others implemented some years ago and well setted, two programmes have been taken into account: \"Production technology and organisation Bachelor\u2019s degree\" from FH Joanneum and \"Bachelor's Degree in Process and Product Innovation Engineering\" at IMH. At the same time, in order to compare the most dualized possible Bachelor's programmes, from TUV only the \u201cNaval Architecture and Marine Technology\u201d programme will be taken into account. For comparative purposes, the following criteria were defined:\n(1) total number of ECTS of the programme\n(2) total n\u00ba. of ECTS corresponding to practical activities in the regular programme\n(3) total number of ECTS of the dual programme\n(4) total no. of ECTS/real hours corresponding to practical activities in the dual programme\n(5) timing of practical activities (semesters)\n(6) dual activities incorporated in the regular timetable or using holiday periods\n(7) selection criteria for practical training entity\n(8) contract/agreements\n(9) payment during practical trainings\n(10) quantity business partners", "samples": [{"hash": "3MYA5Ls6STf", "uri": "/contracts/3MYA5Ls6STf#comparative-analysis", "label": "Grant Agreement", "score": 30.0918140411, "published": true}], "hash": "0d29e062b53bebfcfef8f1ae39efc4a7", "id": 6}, {"size": 1, "snippet_links": [{"key": "change-in", "type": "clause", "offset": [59, 68]}, {"key": "health-coverage", "type": "definition", "offset": [86, 101]}, {"key": "source-of-data", "type": "clause", "offset": [162, 176]}, {"key": "the-projections", "type": "clause", "offset": [233, 248]}, {"key": "over-time", "type": "clause", "offset": [311, 320]}, {"key": "documents-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [397, 409]}, {"key": "target-populations", "type": "definition", "offset": [464, 482]}, {"key": "target-group", "type": "definition", "offset": [525, 537]}, {"key": "period-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [568, 577]}, {"key": "insurance-schemes", "type": "clause", "offset": [676, 693]}, {"key": "to-establish", "type": "definition", "offset": [710, 722]}, {"key": "health-financing", "type": "clause", "offset": [802, 818]}, {"key": "the-targets", "type": "clause", "offset": [1004, 1015]}, {"key": "sources-of-data", "type": "clause", "offset": [1041, 1056]}, {"key": "information-on", "type": "clause", "offset": [1077, 1091]}, {"key": "financial-contribution", "type": "definition", "offset": [1092, 1114]}, {"key": "sensitivity-analysis", "type": "definition", "offset": [1471, 1491]}, {"key": "coverage-levels", "type": "clause", "offset": [1623, 1638]}], "snippet": "The measure of impact our research is interested in is the change in population level health coverage. However, anticipated projections from the MoH was the only source of data we could obtain. Thus we wanted to test the validity of the projections by calculating our own estimates of population level coverage over time, and comparing our estimates to those proposed by the MoH. We used national documents of demographic and socio-economic indicators to estimate target populations and levels of health coverage within each target group. This exercise was applied to period of 2005 to 2011 and shows estimated trends in population coverage achieved by the different types of insurance schemes. Our intent was to establish whether the achieved coverage level within each scheme could be matched by its health financing contribution. To do this we created a table in which data on population coverage from the MOH was presented against our own estimates of coverage. For the sake of our analysis, we used the targets groups found across both sources of data and for which payer information on financial contribution could be found in the NHA dataset. While not considering the impact of new schemes may seem to underestimate overall population coverage, we focused on already well-implemented schemes in an attempt to test their impact. We suppose that the MoH data represents the \u201cknown\u201d estimates we are trying to test against our \u201cspeculated\u201d estimates. We conducted a sensitivity analysis on the \u201cspeculated\u201d estimates to increase accuracy and provide upper and lower bounds. Lastly, we compared estimates of population coverage levels between the known and speculated numbers.", "samples": [{"hash": "Ex95w5FDzY", "uri": "/contracts/Ex95w5FDzY#comparative-analysis", "label": "Distribution Agreement", "score": 32.9048118591, "published": true}], "hash": "72b86c8269b4d042141676727d361521", "id": 8}, {"size": 1, "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-eu", "type": "clause", "offset": [39, 45]}, {"key": "long-term", "type": "clause", "offset": [79, 88]}, {"key": "a-reference-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [177, 191]}, {"key": "the-agreement", "type": "clause", "offset": [220, 233]}, {"key": "the-western", "type": "clause", "offset": [263, 274]}, {"key": "in-place", "type": "clause", "offset": [323, 331]}, {"key": "by-the-union", "type": "clause", "offset": [722, 734]}, {"key": "form-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [751, 758]}], "snippet": "Russia was the first country with whom the EU started a visa dialogue with the long term perspective of visa- free travel, but is not the only one. Most other VFAs also contain a reference to visa liberalisation, except the agreement with Cape Verde. For most of the Western Balkan countries, a visa-free regime is already in place and also with Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia concrete steps have been taken. The road toward the end-goal takes the same route for all these countries: all of the negotiations are centred around the same four blocks as we can find in the Common Steps. The start of the negotiations with the countries from the Western Balkan was made dependent on the fulfilment of technical reforms proposed by the Union, which took the form of a Roadmap. These lists of technical benchmarks were more or less the same for all the Western Balkan countries.", "samples": [{"hash": "fnt4qBwNNwa", "uri": "/contracts/fnt4qBwNNwa#comparative-analysis", "label": "LLM Paper", "score": 29.7058448792, "published": true}], "hash": "5c705509453e8b3987215219ad22194d", "id": 9}, {"size": 1, "snippet_links": [{"key": "customer-shall", "type": "clause", "offset": [0, 14]}, {"key": "the-software", "type": "clause", "offset": [27, 39]}, {"key": "consent-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [171, 181]}, {"key": "reasonable-discretion", "type": "definition", "offset": [217, 238]}, {"key": "of-the-customer", "type": "clause", "offset": [306, 321]}, {"key": "business-requirements", "type": "clause", "offset": [324, 345]}, {"key": "new-product", "type": "clause", "offset": [362, 373]}, {"key": "performance-requirements", "type": "definition", "offset": [376, 400]}], "snippet": "Customer shall not utilize the Software to perform any comparative analysis or benchmarking of the capabilities or functionality of the Software without the prior written consent of STS, which STS may withhold in its reasonable discretion, this prohibition shall not include parallel testing or use of any of the Customer\u2019s business requirements in specifying a new product\u2019s performance requirements.", "samples": [{"hash": "9qEPi9lwHFH", "uri": "/contracts/9qEPi9lwHFH#comparative-analysis", "label": "Software License and Maintenance Agreement", "score": 31.7715415955, "published": true}], "hash": "ec157545b32010f137b45d6550234b85", "id": 10}], "next_curs": "Cl0SV2oVc35sYXdpbnNpZGVyY29udHJhY3RzcjkLEhZDbGF1c2VTbmlwcGV0R3JvdXBfdjU2Ih1jb21wYXJhdGl2ZS1hbmFseXNpcyMwMDAwMDAwYQyiAQJlbhgAIAA=", "clause": {"title": "Comparative Analysis", "size": 20, "parents": [["documentation", "Documentation"], ["results", "Results"], ["\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587-het-land-van-gos", "\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, Het Land van GOS"], ["do-vfas-facilitate", "DO VFAs FACILITATE?"], ["quotation-validity-period", "Quotation Validity Period"]], "children": [["assessment", "assessment"], ["", ""], ["communication-costs-comparison", "Communication Costs Comparison"], ["computational-cost", "Computational Cost"], ["comparison-of-security-attributes", "Comparison of Security Attributes"]], "id": "comparative-analysis", "related": [["quantitative-analysis", "Quantitative Analysis", "Quantitative Analysis"], ["sampling-and-analysis", "Sampling and Analysis", "Sampling and Analysis"], ["risk-analysis", "Risk Analysis", "Risk Analysis"], ["escrow-analysis", "Escrow Analysis", "Escrow Analysis"], ["independent-analysis", "Independent Analysis", "Independent Analysis"]], "related_snippets": [], "updated": "2025-07-24T04:27:51+00:00"}, "json": true, "cursor": ""}}