{"component": "clause", "props": {"groups": [{"samples": [{"hash": "jdwbvCGizfY", "uri": "/contracts/jdwbvCGizfY#case-study", "label": "Master Services and Licensing Agreement (Mri Interventions, Inc.)", "score": 23.2012329102, "published": true}, {"hash": "5ZVGJcRQbkj", "uri": "/contracts/5ZVGJcRQbkj#case-study", "label": "Master Services and Licensing Agreement (Mri Interventions, Inc.)", "score": 22.9876804352, "published": true}, {"hash": "8BhclAVn5zr", "uri": "/contracts/8BhclAVn5zr#case-study", "label": "Master Services and Licensing Agreement (Surgivision Inc)", "score": 21.421628952, "published": true}], "snippet": "Upon Surgi-Vision\u2019s prior written consent in each Instance, Cedara may devise a case-study of any Custom Engineering Services Projects, and may use such case-study for marketing of its engineering services to third parties.", "size": 5, "snippet_links": [{"key": "prior-written-consent", "type": "clause", "offset": [20, 41]}, {"key": "custom-engineering-services", "type": "definition", "offset": [98, 125]}, {"key": "services-to-third-parties", "type": "clause", "offset": [197, 222]}], "hash": "b0bfcfc03fcbe895a7afcd8ef163fbc9", "id": 1}, {"samples": [{"hash": "f3a8BY6EI24", "uri": "/contracts/f3a8BY6EI24#case-study", "label": "Contract", "score": 19.3832988739, "published": true}, {"hash": "hsQmCMhqJzy", "uri": "/contracts/hsQmCMhqJzy#case-study", "label": "Contract", "score": 18.3832988739, "published": true}], "snippet": "Example : 1 I VALUATION OF LAND: II. BUILDING : (A) GROUND FLOOR", "size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "valuation-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [14, 26]}, {"key": "ground-floor", "type": "clause", "offset": [52, 64]}], "hash": "62c58ab5fca72966709ebc584bdc2790", "id": 5}, {"samples": [{"hash": "iAzIwZLRc1Y", "uri": "/contracts/iAzIwZLRc1Y#case-study", "label": "Paris Agreement", "score": 26.737165451, "published": true}, {"hash": "70kMFij9MNT", "uri": "/contracts/70kMFij9MNT#case-study", "label": "Paris Agreement", "score": 26.737165451, "published": true}], "snippet": "The unit of analysis in this research is the policy change in the US with the withdrawal from the Paris Agreement. A case study is about examining a particular phenomenon within its context (Blater & \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, 2012). This research is a case study as it researches the policy change in one single entity, the US under the \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 administration. The justification of this case is that the US is the only country that formally withdrew from the Paris Agreement.\nMaking a case study approach the only research approach for this study as there are no similar cases. The phenomenon that will be studied is the withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, and its context is the US The goal of this research is to explore which factors contributed to the decision. Making it an exploratory case study. It will identify the factors (variables) that contributed to this decision. Through extensive descriptions of the events that led to the withdrawal, this study provides insights into the policy change processes. Policy changes and the role each actor plays in the streams can further our understandings of how policy changes occur. This research is qualitative justified by the complexity of the case study. Several perspectives need to be explored and understood in order to comprehend the decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement. Furthermore, this research design examines the relationship between different entities (e.g. Fox News, \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 administration and the Heritage Foundation). These qualities render it fit for a qualitative research design.", "size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-unit", "type": "clause", "offset": [0, 8]}, {"key": "the-policy", "type": "clause", "offset": [41, 51]}, {"key": "change-in", "type": "clause", "offset": [52, 61]}, {"key": "the-paris-agreement", "type": "clause", "offset": [94, 113]}, {"key": "the-\u2587", "type": "clause", "offset": [318, 323]}, {"key": "research-approach", "type": "clause", "offset": [497, 514]}, {"key": "similar-cases", "type": "definition", "offset": [546, 559]}, {"key": "the-decision", "type": "clause", "offset": [736, 748]}, {"key": "events-that", "type": "clause", "offset": [901, 912]}, {"key": "policy-changes", "type": "definition", "offset": [999, 1013]}, {"key": "the-case", "type": "definition", "offset": [1179, 1187]}, {"key": "in-order-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [1251, 1262]}, {"key": "research-design", "type": "clause", "offset": [1343, 1358]}, {"key": "relationship-between", "type": "clause", "offset": [1372, 1392]}, {"key": "qualitative-research", "type": "clause", "offset": [1515, 1535]}], "hash": "961e23a2df1203de3b35b52896f3320b", "id": 7}, {"samples": [{"hash": "jViyiLdMtE2", "uri": "/contracts/jViyiLdMtE2#case-study", "label": "Shareholder Agreement (OTSAW LTD)", "score": 34.4360046387, "published": true}, {"hash": "5mlEVYmJoVb", "uri": "/contracts/5mlEVYmJoVb#case-study", "label": "Master Asset Sale Agreement (OTSAW LTD)", "score": 34.4360046387, "published": true}], "snippet": "Bejing China PDF 2 28.1.2.1", "size": 2, "snippet_links": [], "hash": "c2eb365a6fbd465563a19e7e5c66c112", "id": 9}, {"samples": [{"hash": "7HZqk97L965", "uri": "/contracts/7HZqk97L965#case-study", "label": "Framework Agreement", "score": 32.1612625122, "published": true}, {"hash": "2boCv6OAIpc", "uri": "/contracts/2boCv6OAIpc#case-study", "label": "Framework Agreement", "score": 32.1612625122, "published": true}, {"hash": "6QgKmvbl6Am", "uri": "/contracts/6QgKmvbl6Am#case-study", "label": "Framework Agreement", "score": 31.8987350464, "published": true}], "snippet": "The Tenderer shall prepare a short and high-level legal opinion regarding the legal issue mention below. The case study shall be based on EU legislations, EU case law and national (Latvian, Estonian and Lithuanian) legislation. Length of an analysis shall not exceed one A4 page, font size 11 pt.", "size": 3, "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-tenderer", "type": "definition", "offset": [0, 12]}, {"key": "legal-opinion", "type": "definition", "offset": [50, 63]}, {"key": "the-case", "type": "definition", "offset": [105, 113]}, {"key": "based-on", "type": "definition", "offset": [129, 137]}, {"key": "case-law", "type": "definition", "offset": [158, 166]}, {"key": "length-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [228, 237]}, {"key": "font-size", "type": "definition", "offset": [280, 289]}], "hash": "923925efcd10250e50f9148f54c03773", "id": 3}, {"samples": [{"hash": "kL8kMnVeUDO", "uri": "/contracts/kL8kMnVeUDO#case-study", "label": "Dynamic Purchasing System Agreement", "score": 30.197555542, "published": true}, {"hash": "hPmaULKf09j", "uri": "/contracts/hPmaULKf09j#case-study", "label": "Dynamic Purchasing System Agreement", "score": 27.0711841583, "published": true}], "snippet": "2.1 Provide CCS with a Case Study, to be publically available, relating to the Suppliers first Call-Off under the DPS and at least one further Case Study annually, where at least one further Call-Off is entered into and the contract is not subject to any restrictions regarding publicity 1 case study for first Call Off Confirmation of Case study received for first Call Off, and if further Call Offs are awarded then an additional Case Study each year to be provided.", "size": 3, "snippet_links": [{"key": "relating-to", "type": "definition", "offset": [63, 74]}, {"key": "entered-into", "type": "clause", "offset": [203, 215]}, {"key": "the-contract", "type": "clause", "offset": [220, 232]}, {"key": "subject-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [240, 250]}, {"key": "confirmation-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [320, 335]}, {"key": "an-additional", "type": "clause", "offset": [418, 431]}, {"key": "each-year", "type": "definition", "offset": [443, 452]}], "hash": "048fd4a0540c339a6f89e0944173ac39", "id": 4}, {"samples": [{"hash": "4r47zvvpJ2M", "uri": "/contracts/4r47zvvpJ2M#case-study", "label": "Access Permission Contracts", "score": 20.9325809479, "published": true}, {"hash": "1469J5PPZ7k", "uri": "/contracts/1469J5PPZ7k#case-study", "label": "Access Permission Contracts", "score": 19.9486656189, "published": true}], "snippet": "Deltablue Benchmark", "size": 2, "snippet_links": [], "hash": "19f78608588fe4d3b0948d8f4e5160e4", "id": 8}, {"samples": [{"hash": "cxrehSo0eUk", "uri": "/contracts/cxrehSo0eUk#case-study", "label": "Master Service Agreement (Websidestory Inc)", "score": 18.0, "published": true}, {"hash": "1jjY8SZw7Bo", "uri": "/contracts/1jjY8SZw7Bo#case-study", "label": "Master Service Agreement (Websidestory Inc)", "score": 18.0, "published": true}], "snippet": "WDIG will allow WSS to work with certain of its business units to develop and publish one case study per quarter (up to 12 for the 3 year Term). WDIG shall make commercially reasonable efforts to make personnel at such business units available to WSS. No such case study may take more than a reasonable amount of time or effort on the part of WDIG, its business units, or any of their respective personnel. In addition, WSS shall request time from such resources with reasonable notice, and shall provide the case study to WDIG for review prior to distribution. No case study shall be distributed without WDIG's prior written approval in each instance, which approval may be granted or withheld in WDIG's sole discretion for any reason whatsoever. Case studies may be distributed by WSS in hard copy, via email, or in response to inquiries (made online or otherwise) for case studies; provided, however, that any distribution of case studies by WSS must be to select third parties and may not be included in any mass distribution. Under no circumstances may any case study be posted on a website. WDIG, at its discretion, may require WSS to distribute case studies without identifying WDIG and/or any Disney company in the case study.", "size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "business-units", "type": "definition", "offset": [48, 62]}, {"key": "to-develop", "type": "definition", "offset": [63, 73]}, {"key": "commercially-reasonable-efforts", "type": "definition", "offset": [161, 192]}, {"key": "available-to", "type": "definition", "offset": [234, 246]}, {"key": "reasonable-amount", "type": "definition", "offset": [292, 309]}, {"key": "in-addition", "type": "clause", "offset": [407, 418]}, {"key": "request-time", "type": "clause", "offset": [430, 442]}, {"key": "with-reasonable-notice", "type": "clause", "offset": [463, 485]}, {"key": "provide-the", "type": "clause", "offset": [497, 508]}, {"key": "for-review", "type": "clause", "offset": [528, 538]}, {"key": "prior-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [539, 547]}, {"key": "no-case", "type": "clause", "offset": [562, 569]}, {"key": "prior-written-approval", "type": "definition", "offset": [612, 634]}, {"key": "sole-discretion", "type": "clause", "offset": [705, 720]}, {"key": "for-any-reason", "type": "clause", "offset": [721, 735]}, {"key": "case-studies", "type": "clause", "offset": [748, 760]}, {"key": "hard-copy", "type": "definition", "offset": [790, 799]}, {"key": "response-to-inquiries", "type": "clause", "offset": [818, 839]}, {"key": "distribution-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [913, 928]}, {"key": "third-parties", "type": "definition", "offset": [967, 980]}, {"key": "no-circumstances", "type": "clause", "offset": [1037, 1053]}, {"key": "to-distribute", "type": "definition", "offset": [1138, 1151]}, {"key": "in-the-case", "type": "clause", "offset": [1216, 1227]}], "hash": "90ccae04c01fa7a244c501c8d45c4df9", "id": 6}, {"samples": [{"hash": "2N2StuFeqld", "uri": "/contracts/2N2StuFeqld#case-study", "label": "Agreement on the Conservation of African Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds", "score": 31.4687099457, "published": true}, {"hash": "3OF2TkDiNwI", "uri": "/contracts/3OF2TkDiNwI#case-study", "label": "Agreement on the Conservation of African Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds", "score": 26.7946605682, "published": true}], "snippet": "Recovery of the Eurasian Spoonbill in France Indirectly relevant to AEWA. Only indirectly relevant to AEWA\u2019s objectives, although there are potentially issues related to hybridisation between wild and domestic-bred waterbirds. Status assessments Highly relevant to AEWA. The need to ensure that important habitats for waterbirds are subject to wise and multifunctional use is central to AEWA\u2019s objectives and will best ensure their long-term survival in the face of multiple pressures. The restoration of degraded habitats is particularly important to reverse past losses.", "size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "recovery-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [0, 11]}, {"key": "related-to", "type": "definition", "offset": [159, 169]}, {"key": "to-ensure", "type": "clause", "offset": [280, 289]}, {"key": "subject-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [333, 343]}, {"key": "restoration-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [490, 504]}], "hash": "c894ac52d66b8266109fa9af68a085b6", "id": 10}, {"samples": [{"hash": "4EABTzCi0FI", "uri": "/contracts/4EABTzCi0FI#case-study", "label": "Reputation Based Agreement", "score": 19.725402832, "published": true}, {"hash": "7o1vnmMM6Ar", "uri": "/contracts/7o1vnmMM6Ar#case-study", "label": "Reputation Based Agreement", "score": 19.0, "published": true}, {"hash": "bIXYyn2E8cI", "uri": "/contracts/bIXYyn2E8cI#case-study", "label": "Reputation Based Agreement", "score": 17.0, "published": true}], "snippet": "In this section, we illustrate the proposed model by means of a simple case study. The scenario we use involves five different agents: Anna, John, \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 and \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 participating within an organisation. In this organisation agents can buy and sell items, so the action space of agents is composed of actions such as, buy- item-x, sell-item-x, where x is whatever object they want to sell/buy. Besides, agents joined the organisation playing the following roles: \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 - buyer, \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 - buyer, \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 - buyer, \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 - seller and \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 - seller. The situations in which an agent is involved in that organisation are regulated by organisational norms [5], some examples of such norms are:\n\u2013 1 : An agent playing the role seller must deliver the product sold 2 days after the payment, as maximum\u201d\n\u2013 2 : An agent playing the role buyer must pay 2 days after the purchase is performed, as maximum\u201d info info", "size": 3, "snippet_links": [{"key": "proposed-model", "type": "clause", "offset": [35, 49]}, {"key": "buy-and-sell", "type": "clause", "offset": [243, 255]}, {"key": "the-action", "type": "definition", "offset": [266, 276]}, {"key": "to-sell", "type": "clause", "offset": [388, 395]}, {"key": "the-organisation", "type": "clause", "offset": [424, 440]}, {"key": "an-agent", "type": "clause", "offset": [575, 583]}, {"key": "examples-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [665, 676]}, {"key": "the-product", "type": "definition", "offset": [745, 756]}, {"key": "days-after", "type": "definition", "offset": [764, 774]}, {"key": "the-payment", "type": "clause", "offset": [775, 786]}, {"key": "buyer-must", "type": "clause", "offset": [832, 842]}, {"key": "the-purchase", "type": "clause", "offset": [860, 872]}], "hash": "c01323a6cffd65909078e67a8b718878", "id": 2}], "next_curs": "ClMSTWoVc35sYXdpbnNpZGVyY29udHJhY3Rzci8LEhZDbGF1c2VTbmlwcGV0R3JvdXBfdjU2IhNjYXNlLXN0dWR5IzAwMDAwMDBhDKIBAmVuGAAgAA==", "clause": {"parents": [["general", "General"], ["research-design", "Research Design"], ["trademarks-and-marketing", "Trademarks and Marketing"], ["marketing", "Marketing"], ["miscellaneous-and-governing-law", "Miscellaneous and Governing Law"]], "children": [["", ""], ["decisiones", "Decisiones"], ["seguridad-alimentaria-del-hogar", "Seguridad alimentaria del hogar"], ["preguntas-de-apertura", "Preguntas de Apertura"], ["implementation-of-evacuaid", "Implementation of Evacuaid"]], "title": "Case Study", "size": 143, "id": "case-study", "related": [["study", "Study", "Study"], ["feasibility-study", "Feasibility Study", "Feasibility Study"], ["the-study", "The Study", "The Study"], ["study-population", "Study Population", "Study Population"], ["protocol", "Protocol", "Protocol"]], "related_snippets": [], "updated": "2025-07-24T04:27:57+00:00", "also_ask": ["What strategic objectives can a 'Case Study' clause achieve for each party?", "Which essential elements must be included to protect confidentiality and IP rights?", "What are the main legal risks if the clause is vague or overbroad?", "How does enforceability of 'Case Study' clauses compare across key jurisdictions?", "What arguments have courts accepted or rejected regarding the use of client information in case studies?"], "drafting_tip": "Specify the purpose and parameters of the case study to prevent misinterpretation; outline data usage and confidentiality terms to protect sensitive information; require participant consent to ensure legal compliance.", "explanation": "A Case Study clause outlines the inclusion or use of real-world examples or scenarios within a contract or agreement to illustrate how certain terms or processes are applied in practice. This clause may specify the format, frequency, or subject matter of case studies to be provided, and can require parties to share anonymized data or detailed accounts of relevant experiences. Its core practical function is to enhance understanding and transparency by providing concrete illustrations, thereby clarifying expectations and reducing the risk of misinterpretation."}, "json": true, "cursor": ""}}