{"component": "clause", "props": {"groups": [{"snippet": "Provide case studies describing the financial experience of the Proposer and other members of the finance team. The case studies shall include a brief overview of the project. The case studies shall also describe any particular challenges in financial aspects of the transaction that were encountered and how these challenges were overcome in order to achieve financial close. Responses to this question shall include a case study for each of the projects referenced in Form F. These case studies shall illustrate specific experience with the following:\ni. structuring and securing financing commitments for surface transportation design- build-finance-operate-maintain or design-build-finance-maintain projects of approximately $400 million or more, including raising equity capital from internal sources, investment funds or other external sources;\nii. success in reaching financial close for surface transportation design-build-finance- operate-maintain or design-build-finance-maintain projects of approximately $400 million or more;\niii. closing transactions utilizing a wide range of financing and funding tools and instruments, such as bank debt, TIFIA, PABs, other revenue bonds and credit enhancement instruments and use of public funds;\niv. readiness, flexibility and availability of funds to invest levels of equity consistent with the scope and nature of the Project;\nv. securing credit ratings necessary for project debt; and\nvi. managing events or challenges that could arise and affect the achievement of financial close. Each case study shall not exceed two (2) pages.", "samples": [{"hash": "4uKF9toKSmd", "uri": "/contracts/4uKF9toKSmd#case-studies", "label": "Public Private Partnership Agreement", "score": 22.3582859039, "published": true}, {"hash": "E5QtYEfFQ", "uri": "/contracts/E5QtYEfFQ#case-studies", "label": "Public Private Partnership Agreement", "score": 22.1373004913, "published": true}, {"hash": "9W5jgeYo3vB", "uri": "/contracts/9W5jgeYo3vB#case-studies", "label": "Public Private Partnership Agreement", "score": 20.5687885284, "published": true}], "size": 9, "snippet_links": [{"key": "financial-experience", "type": "clause", "offset": [36, 56]}, {"key": "members-of-the", "type": "clause", "offset": [83, 97]}, {"key": "finance-team", "type": "definition", "offset": [98, 110]}, {"key": "the-case", "type": "definition", "offset": [112, 120]}, {"key": "overview-of-the-project", "type": "clause", "offset": [151, 174]}, {"key": "financial-aspects", "type": "definition", "offset": [242, 259]}, {"key": "the-transaction", "type": "clause", "offset": [263, 278]}, {"key": "in-order-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [340, 351]}, {"key": "case-study", "type": "clause", "offset": [420, 430]}, {"key": "the-projects", "type": "clause", "offset": [443, 455]}, {"key": "specific-experience", "type": "clause", "offset": [514, 533]}, {"key": "financing-commitments", "type": "definition", "offset": [582, 603]}, {"key": "surface-transportation", "type": "clause", "offset": [608, 630]}, {"key": "equity-capital", "type": "definition", "offset": [769, 783]}, {"key": "investment-funds", "type": "definition", "offset": [807, 823]}, {"key": "external-sources", "type": "definition", "offset": [833, 849]}, {"key": "closing-transactions", "type": "clause", "offset": [1043, 1063]}, {"key": "wide-range", "type": "definition", "offset": [1076, 1086]}, {"key": "and-funding", "type": "clause", "offset": [1100, 1111]}, {"key": "tools-and-instruments", "type": "clause", "offset": [1112, 1133]}, {"key": "bank-debt", "type": "definition", "offset": [1143, 1152]}, {"key": "revenue-bonds", "type": "clause", "offset": [1173, 1186]}, {"key": "credit-enhancement", "type": "clause", "offset": [1191, 1209]}, {"key": "use-of-public-funds", "type": "clause", "offset": [1226, 1245]}, {"key": "availability-of-funds", "type": "clause", "offset": [1278, 1299]}, {"key": "to-invest", "type": "clause", "offset": [1300, 1309]}, {"key": "nature-of-the-project", "type": "clause", "offset": [1357, 1378]}, {"key": "credit-ratings", "type": "definition", "offset": [1392, 1406]}, {"key": "project-debt", "type": "clause", "offset": [1421, 1433]}, {"key": "achievement-of-financial-close", "type": "clause", "offset": [1505, 1535]}, {"key": "each-case", "type": "definition", "offset": [1537, 1546]}], "hash": "51d4c45670a46ea6026f6ef1ee0e02e4", "id": 1}, {"snippet": "Hyland may, with the prior approval of Customer, prepare, publish and distribute, for its sales, marketing and advertising purposes, one or more case studies describing any or all of the applications for which \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2019\u2587 products or services will be used by Customer (e.g., Accounts Payable).", "samples": [{"hash": "d7gaEgFtSml", "uri": "/contracts/d7gaEgFtSml#case-studies", "label": "Master Agreement", "score": 33.3701629639, "published": true}, {"hash": "l2iLgNLwqpO", "uri": "/contracts/l2iLgNLwqpO#case-studies", "label": "Master Agreement", "score": 32.7761535645, "published": true}, {"hash": "6n2Uo4PjvgH", "uri": "/contracts/6n2Uo4PjvgH#case-studies", "label": "Saas Agreement", "score": 32.6474990845, "published": true}], "size": 4, "snippet_links": [{"key": "of-customer", "type": "clause", "offset": [36, 47]}, {"key": "advertising-purposes", "type": "definition", "offset": [111, 131]}, {"key": "applications-for", "type": "clause", "offset": [187, 203]}, {"key": "products-or-services", "type": "definition", "offset": [219, 239]}, {"key": "by-customer", "type": "clause", "offset": [253, 264]}, {"key": "accounts-payable", "type": "clause", "offset": [272, 288]}], "hash": "0cee061c549479eedfe95116a5796986", "id": 3}, {"snippet": "the perspective from civil protection to Including People with Disabilities in Disaster Preparedness and Response and good examples from the Questionnaire on Disability Inclusive Disaster Risk Reduction", "samples": [{"hash": "44FQF7RDquM", "uri": "/contracts/44FQF7RDquM#case-studies", "label": "Workshop", "score": 20.9028072357, "published": true}, {"hash": "6LvAj3qxX4", "uri": "/contracts/6LvAj3qxX4#case-studies", "label": "Workshop", "score": 20.8932247162, "published": true}, {"hash": "4NtP0UNvt5b", "uri": "/contracts/4NtP0UNvt5b#case-studies", "label": "Report on Including People With Disabilities in Disaster Preparedness and Response", "score": 19.0314846039, "published": true}], "size": 4, "snippet_links": [{"key": "civil-protection", "type": "clause", "offset": [21, 37]}, {"key": "people-with-disabilities", "type": "clause", "offset": [51, 75]}, {"key": "disaster-preparedness-and-response", "type": "clause", "offset": [79, 113]}, {"key": "on-disability", "type": "clause", "offset": [155, 168]}, {"key": "risk-reduction", "type": "clause", "offset": [188, 202]}], "hash": "aebff44f7c02ebe626d9637a89077fe0", "id": 2}, {"snippet": "introduction52 The first case study concerns the genocide committed by Bosnian Serb forces in the summer of 1995, involving the killing of thousands of Bosnian men who had gathered at the Eastern Bosnian enclave of Srebrenica.53 Though the enclave had been designated a \u2018safe area\u2019 by the UNSC, acting under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, UNPROFOR\u2019s Dutch battalion (\u2018DUTCHBAT\u2019) proved unable to protect it. In 2007, in Mothers of Srebrenica, survivors of the genocide sued the UN and the State of the Netherlands before the Dutch courts, holding them partly responsible for the fall of the enclave and the ensuing genocide. The Dutch courts held that the UN enjoyed immunity from jurisdiction. Before the ECtHR, the claimants argued that the Netherlands had breached Article 6(1) of the ECHR on account of its courts having upheld the UN\u2019s immunity. In 2013, the ECtHR declared the application inadmissible. In its contemporary case law concerning the jurisdictional immunity of international organisations, the ECtHR has consistently found that Article 6(1) of the ECHR has not been breached. Mothers of Srebrenica, however, is the only case before the Court in which alternative remedies were not available to the claimants. The ECtHR left unresolved in that case whether it deemed the UN to have breached Section 29 of the General Convention. In the immunity proceedings in Mothers of Srebrenica, the Dutch Supreme Court had found that the lack of alternative remedies was at odds with Section 29(a) of the General Convention. By implication, therefore, according to the Supreme Court, the dispute had a \u2018private law character\u2019 in terms of that provision. The second case study concerns allegations of lead poisoning due to soil contamination in camps for internally displaced persons in Kosovo. These camps, set up since 1999, were administered by UNMIK, the UN\u2019s mission in Kosovo, which was responsible for the interim administration of Kosovo under a UNSC mandate. Former residents of the camps alleged that UNMIK had violated their human rights, including their right to life. In 2006, in N.M. and Others, the complainants submitted claims under, what the UNMIK administrative framework referred to as, the \u2018UN Third Party Claims Process\u2019, which involved the settlement of third-party claims by a claims commission. In 2011, apparently without such a commission having been established, the UN Legal Counsel declared the claims \u2018non-receivable\u2019 for lack of a private law character. The complainants then pursued their case before the Human Rights Advisory Panel (\u2018HRAP\u2019). In 2016, the HRAP concluded that UNMIK had 52 In the context of the UN\u2019s implementation of Section 29(a) of the General Convention, subsection 3.3.3 of this study provides more extensive introductions to these case studies, together with references, including the main commonalities and differences.", "samples": [{"hash": "dDzVUP8Cfo4", "uri": "/contracts/dDzVUP8Cfo4#case-studies", "label": "Doctoral Thesis", "score": 29.9703540802, "published": true}, {"hash": "l4AT8inrHiE", "uri": "/contracts/l4AT8inrHiE#case-studies", "label": "Doctoral Thesis", "score": 24.1697463989, "published": true}, {"hash": "7L0ACK2W7la", "uri": "/contracts/7L0ACK2W7la#case-studies", "label": "Doctoral Thesis", "score": 24.1697463989, "published": true}], "size": 3, "snippet_links": [{"key": "case-study", "type": "clause", "offset": [25, 35]}, {"key": "chapter-vii", "type": "definition", "offset": [308, 319]}, {"key": "the-un", "type": "definition", "offset": [323, 329]}, {"key": "state-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [489, 497]}, {"key": "the-netherlands", "type": "clause", "offset": [498, 513]}, {"key": "responsible-for", "type": "clause", "offset": [559, 574]}, {"key": "immunity-from-jurisdiction", "type": "clause", "offset": [667, 693]}, {"key": "the-application", "type": "clause", "offset": [879, 894]}, {"key": "case-law", "type": "definition", "offset": [929, 937]}, {"key": "concerning-the", "type": "clause", "offset": [938, 952]}, {"key": "international-organisations", "type": "clause", "offset": [980, 1007]}, {"key": "court-in", "type": "clause", "offset": [1155, 1163]}, {"key": "alternative-remedies", "type": "clause", "offset": [1170, 1190]}, {"key": "available-to", "type": "definition", "offset": [1200, 1212]}, {"key": "section-29", "type": "clause", "offset": [1309, 1319]}, {"key": "general-convention", "type": "definition", "offset": [1327, 1345]}, {"key": "lack-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [1444, 1451]}, {"key": "according-to", "type": "definition", "offset": [1558, 1570]}, {"key": "the-supreme-court", "type": "clause", "offset": [1571, 1588]}, {"key": "the-dispute", "type": "clause", "offset": [1590, 1601]}, {"key": "private-law", "type": "definition", "offset": [1609, 1620]}, {"key": "terms-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [1635, 1643]}, {"key": "lead-poisoning", "type": "clause", "offset": [1706, 1720]}, {"key": "soil-contamination", "type": "clause", "offset": [1728, 1746]}, {"key": "internally-displaced-persons", "type": "definition", "offset": [1760, 1788]}, {"key": "administration-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [1926, 1943]}, {"key": "residents-of-the", "type": "clause", "offset": [1980, 1996]}, {"key": "human-rights", "type": "clause", "offset": [2041, 2053]}, {"key": "right-to-life", "type": "definition", "offset": [2071, 2084]}, {"key": "claims-under", "type": "clause", "offset": [2142, 2154]}, {"key": "third-party-claims-process", "type": "clause", "offset": [2220, 2246]}, {"key": "settlement-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [2268, 2281]}, {"key": "having-been", "type": "clause", "offset": [2371, 2382]}, {"key": "legal-counsel", "type": "definition", "offset": [2403, 2416]}, {"key": "the-claims", "type": "clause", "offset": [2426, 2436]}, {"key": "the-human", "type": "clause", "offset": [2539, 2548]}, {"key": "advisory-panel", "type": "clause", "offset": [2556, 2570]}, {"key": "context-of-the", "type": "clause", "offset": [2634, 2648]}], "hash": "dee5658f2f6763cc0d9176f603cb7cf4", "id": 4}, {"snippet": "18 The contractor may use an online living wage calculator that is based on geography (e.g., \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587://\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587.\u2587\u2587\u2587.\u2587\u2587\u2587/). Case studies will be developed for three institutions to provide a more in-depth examination of the current state of arts and transdisciplinary programs, and improved understanding of the value of these programs to the surrounding community, including the social, cultural, and economic opportunities for local residents and workers. Findings from these case studies will present relevant, detailed examples of different approaches to cultivating arts assets and community partnerships HBCUs are currently employing. Institutions will be selected that differ substantially by student population size and location and which have different approaches to cultivating arts assets; the contractor shall work with the COR to finalize criteria for selecting institutions for case study analysis using data collected in the previous data collection activities. The contractor shall conduct up to 7 virtual focus groups with institutional leaders (deans, department/program chairpersons, career development staff, center/institute directors, research directors), campus arts administrators and faculty, and student and alumni representatives from each campus, as well as LAA/SAA/\u2587\u2587\u2587 program staff, representatives from regional workforce development boards, and industry and community arts leaders and partners. Focus group topics of discussion may include innovative curricular, extracurricular, and structural models that complement or supplement traditional fine arts curricula, such as transdisciplinary arts integration programs, STEAM initiatives, including maker spaces and incubators, and public policy and administration arts-related programs. LAA/SAA/\u2587\u2587\u2587 program staff in the HBCUs\u2019 regions will provide additional information on the nature of HBCUs\u2019 participation in local, state, and regional arts networks. The contractor shall prepare for NEA review and approval a recommended list of focus group participants prior to initiating contact with experts. The contractor shall conduct case studies mostly without the agency\u2019s logistical support, although the COR retains the right to audit selected focus groups with advance notice provided to the contractor. The NEA recommends that the contractor pay a stipend equivalent to a living wage, but the contractor is responsible for the final decision on compensation. In analyzing data, the contractor is expected to use both qualitative and quantitative methods. The contractor shall feature each case study in the final report, which will incorporate quantitative and qualitative data from the background research, asset mapping, survey and focus groups to comprehensively document each institutions\u2019 cultural infrastructure, formal and informal. This report narrative will include pictures from each institution (with permission), in addition to charts and graphics. Institutional asset maps will be developed for case study institutions and presented in infographic format in the report (Deliverable #14).", "samples": [{"hash": "kY1e6g9j2Ai", "uri": "/contracts/kY1e6g9j2Ai#case-studies", "label": "Blanket Purchase Agreement (Bpa)", "score": 31.0983047485, "published": true}, {"hash": "fSnCG6DoUOr", "uri": "/contracts/fSnCG6DoUOr#case-studies", "label": "Blanket Purchase Agreement (Bpa)", "score": 31.0983047485, "published": true}], "size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-contractor-may", "type": "clause", "offset": [3, 21]}, {"key": "living-wage", "type": "clause", "offset": [36, 47]}, {"key": "based-on", "type": "definition", "offset": [67, 75]}, {"key": "to-provide", "type": "clause", "offset": [177, 187]}, {"key": "state-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [231, 239]}, {"key": "the-value", "type": "clause", "offset": [307, 316]}, {"key": "economic-opportunities", "type": "definition", "offset": [401, 423]}, {"key": "local-residents", "type": "clause", "offset": [428, 443]}, {"key": "examples-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [522, 533]}, {"key": "community-partnerships", "type": "clause", "offset": [586, 608]}, {"key": "size-and-location", "type": "clause", "offset": [718, 735]}, {"key": "the-contractor-shall", "type": "clause", "offset": [800, 820]}, {"key": "case-study-analysis", "type": "clause", "offset": [891, 910]}, {"key": "data-collected", "type": "clause", "offset": [917, 931]}, {"key": "collection-activities", "type": "clause", "offset": [953, 974]}, {"key": "focus-groups", "type": "definition", "offset": [1021, 1033]}, {"key": "career-development", "type": "definition", "offset": [1102, 1120]}, {"key": "program-staff", "type": "clause", "offset": [1297, 1310]}, {"key": "workforce-development", "type": "clause", "offset": [1342, 1363]}, {"key": "fine-arts", "type": "clause", "offset": [1575, 1584]}, {"key": "integration-programs", "type": "clause", "offset": [1627, 1647]}, {"key": "public-policy", "type": "clause", "offset": [1711, 1724]}, {"key": "related-programs", "type": "clause", "offset": [1749, 1765]}, {"key": "information-on", "type": "clause", "offset": [1839, 1853]}, {"key": "nature-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [1858, 1867]}, {"key": "review-and-approval", "type": "clause", "offset": [1971, 1990]}, {"key": "prior-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [2038, 2046]}, {"key": "the-agency", "type": "clause", "offset": [2137, 2147]}, {"key": "logistical-support", "type": "clause", "offset": [2150, 2168]}, {"key": "right-to-audit", "type": "definition", "offset": [2199, 2213]}, {"key": "notice-provided", "type": "clause", "offset": [2249, 2264]}, {"key": "to-the-contractor", "type": "clause", "offset": [2265, 2282]}, {"key": "responsible-for", "type": "clause", "offset": [2388, 2403]}, {"key": "final-decision", "type": "definition", "offset": [2408, 2422]}, {"key": "each-case", "type": "definition", "offset": [2565, 2574]}, {"key": "the-final-report", "type": "clause", "offset": [2584, 2600]}, {"key": "qualitative-data", "type": "clause", "offset": [2642, 2658]}, {"key": "background-research", "type": "clause", "offset": [2668, 2687]}, {"key": "asset-mapping", "type": "definition", "offset": [2689, 2702]}, {"key": "cultural-infrastructure", "type": "clause", "offset": [2775, 2798]}, {"key": "formal-and-informal", "type": "clause", "offset": [2800, 2819]}, {"key": "in-addition-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [2906, 2920]}, {"key": "the-report", "type": "clause", "offset": [3052, 3062]}], "hash": "f5c67d73f715790dd6f9a3a4cb5eebd2", "id": 9}, {"snippet": "the situation of people with disabilities related to disaster risk reduction in the EUR-OPA member States, good examples from the Questionnaire on Disability Inclusive Disaster Risk Reduction and the UNISDR Survey on Disaster Reduction", "samples": [{"hash": "44FQF7RDquM", "uri": "/contracts/44FQF7RDquM#case-studies", "label": "Workshop", "score": 20.9028072357, "published": true}, {"hash": "6LvAj3qxX4", "uri": "/contracts/6LvAj3qxX4#case-studies", "label": "Workshop", "score": 20.8932247162, "published": true}, {"hash": "4NtP0UNvt5b", "uri": "/contracts/4NtP0UNvt5b#case-studies", "label": "Report on Including People With Disabilities in Disaster Preparedness and Response", "score": 19.0314846039, "published": true}], "size": 3, "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-situation", "type": "clause", "offset": [0, 13]}, {"key": "people-with-disabilities", "type": "clause", "offset": [17, 41]}, {"key": "related-to", "type": "definition", "offset": [42, 52]}, {"key": "reduction-in", "type": "definition", "offset": [67, 79]}, {"key": "member-states", "type": "clause", "offset": [92, 105]}, {"key": "on-disability", "type": "clause", "offset": [144, 157]}], "hash": "a18e6039ba4d9de4c6de59cb00ce3cc9", "id": 5}, {"snippet": "\u200c In the previous task, a comprehensive literature review of existing AFC systems was conducted. The literature review helped identify current practices and innovative methods and applications on the use of AFC data. This task enhances the Literature Review by identifying three case studies. These are locations where transit agencies have utilized AFC data to develop approaches, methodologies, technologies, applications, tools, etc. to help improve their efficiencies. This was based on the available information available through documentations, project reports, and research papers. The case studies focus on the use of AFC data, the analysis, and the methods used to retrieve, analyze, and visualize the data for transit planning applications. The selected locations of the case studies are New York, Massachusetts, and Utah with their corresponding transit agencies: Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA), and the Utah Transit Authority (UTA). Below is the general information of each of the agencies: The MTA (Metropolitan Transportation Authority) is North America's largest transportation network, serving a population of 15.3 million people in the 5,000-square-mile area from New York City through Long Island, southeastern New York State, and Connecticut. The MTA network comprises the nation\u2019s largest bus fleet and more subway and commuter rail cars than all other U.S. transit systems combined. The MTA's operating agencies are MTA New York City Transit, MTA Bus, Long Island Rail Road, Metro-North Railroad, and MTA Bridges and Tunnels. The MTA transit network operates 24 hours per day. The MTA subway had a daily ridership of approximately 5.5 million and an annual ridership in 2019 of roughly 1.698 billion. It includes 472 subway stations and more than 6,600 subway cars, which collectively traveled about 365 million miles in 2019. At the end of 2019, the MTA Bus and New York City Transit bus system had 327 routes: 234 local, 20 Select Bus Service, and 73 express routes. The bus fleet had a total of 5,927 vehicles, all 100% accessible to riders with disabilities. The bus daily ridership was approximately 2.2 million and an annual ridership of 678 million in 2019. The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, often referred to as the MBTA or simply \u201cThe T\u201d, is the public operator of most bus, subway, commuter rail and ferry systems in the greater Boston, Massachusetts, area. It is the largest transit provider in New England, and the fifth largest in the country. The MBTA district is made up of 175 communities with a total population of 4.7 million. MBTA fixed route service serves the Greater Boston area. The subway is the largest part of Boston\u2019s public transit system with 4 main subway lines: the Green, Blue, Orange, and Red lines serving throughout Allston, Braintree, Brighton, Brookline, Cambridge, Dorchester, East Boston, Jamaica Plain, Malden, Mattapan, \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, Mission Hill, Newton, Quincy, Revere, Roxbury, Somerville, and South Boston. The hours of operation vary, but most bus and train service start around 5:00 AM and ends around 1:00 AM. In Boston, 55% of all work trips and 42% of all trips into downtown are made by transit. It roughly provided a weekday average of 1.3 million rides of all modes and 90% of those rides were on bus, heavy rail, and light rail. The bus service has a weekday average ridership of 153,000 as of July 2020. The MBTA operates 171 bus routes and 4 rapid transit routes in the Greater Boston area, with connections to the subway and commuter rail. As per July 2020 data, the subway has a ridership of 140,000 trips each weekday. It has 128 stops making easier the connections to or from other subway lines, MBTA buses, Commuter Rail, Amtrak, and regional bus services. Utah Transit Authority (UTA) provides an integrated system of innovative, accessible, and efficient public transportation services that contribute to increased access to opportunities and a healthy environment for all people of the Wasatch region. It operates bus, bus rapid transit, light rail, commuter rail, vanpool, streetcar, and Paratransit services in Box Elder, Davis, Salt Lake, Tooele, Utah, and \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 Counties. In 2018, UTA ridership reached more than 44 million trips with a daily ridership of 152,826 trips. 100% of UTA's fixed route bus and TRAX light rail service is wheelchair accessible with lift-equipped or low floor buses and trains. Riders can choose from more than 120 bus routes across UTA\u2019s 1,400-mile service area. The UTA\u2019s bus fleet had a total of 520 buses in 2018. They also provide a paratransit service counting with 80 paratransit vehicles for qualifying riders. As of 2018, the bus service had a ridership of more than 74,000 trips. Bus schedule varies from 4:00 AM to 1:00 AM seven days a week. TRAX, UTA\u2019s light rail system has a total of 114 vehicles with 42.5 miles of line and 50 stations offering convenient connections to community destinations like shopping centers, schools and universities, FrontRunner stations, bus hubs, and Park & Ride lots throughout the Salt Lake valley. TRAX runs seven days per week, with 15-minute headways during peak times. In 2018, the FrontRunner commuter service had an average weekday boardings of 18,431 and the TRAX light rail 57,103.\n3.1 New York MTA\u200c", "samples": [{"hash": "bJNfAEjgw5Z", "uri": "/contracts/bJNfAEjgw5Z#case-studies", "label": "Technical Memorandum", "score": 30.3956604004, "published": true}, {"hash": "b7ErzyuK6kk", "uri": "/contracts/b7ErzyuK6kk#case-studies", "label": "Technical Memorandum", "score": 30.3956604004, "published": true}], "size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "review-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [51, 60]}, {"key": "current-practices", "type": "clause", "offset": [135, 152]}, {"key": "to-develop", "type": "definition", "offset": [359, 369]}, {"key": "based-on", "type": "definition", "offset": [482, 490]}, {"key": "information-available", "type": "clause", "offset": [505, 526]}, {"key": "project-reports", "type": "definition", "offset": [551, 566]}, {"key": "the-case", "type": "definition", "offset": [589, 597]}, {"key": "the-data", "type": "clause", "offset": [707, 715]}, {"key": "planning-applications", "type": "clause", "offset": [728, 749]}, {"key": "selected-locations", "type": "definition", "offset": [755, 773]}, {"key": "metropolitan-transportation-authority", "type": "definition", "offset": [875, 912]}, {"key": "transit-authority", "type": "clause", "offset": [984, 1001]}, {"key": "information-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [1030, 1044]}, {"key": "the-agencies", "type": "definition", "offset": [1053, 1065]}, {"key": "north-america", "type": "clause", "offset": [1118, 1131]}, {"key": "new-york-city", "type": "definition", "offset": [1245, 1258]}, {"key": "new-york-state", "type": "clause", "offset": [1293, 1307]}, {"key": "rail-cars", "type": "definition", "offset": [1412, 1421]}, {"key": "other-us", "type": "clause", "offset": [1431, 1440]}, {"key": "transit-network", "type": "definition", "offset": [1619, 1634]}, {"key": "hours-per-day", "type": "clause", "offset": [1647, 1660]}, {"key": "an-annual", "type": "clause", "offset": [1732, 1741]}, {"key": "at-the-end-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [1912, 1925]}, {"key": "bus-system", "type": "definition", "offset": [1970, 1980]}, {"key": "the-t", "type": "clause", "offset": [2339, 2344]}, {"key": "the-public", "type": "clause", "offset": [2350, 2360]}, {"key": "greater-boston", "type": "definition", "offset": [2430, 2444]}, {"key": "transit-provider", "type": "definition", "offset": [2485, 2501]}, {"key": "new-england", "type": "clause", "offset": [2505, 2516]}, {"key": "the-country", "type": "definition", "offset": [2543, 2554]}, {"key": "total-population", "type": "clause", "offset": [2611, 2627]}, {"key": "fixed-route-service", "type": "clause", "offset": [2649, 2668]}, {"key": "public-transit-system", "type": "definition", "offset": [2744, 2765]}, {"key": "hours-of-operation", "type": "definition", "offset": [3058, 3076]}, {"key": "train-service", "type": "definition", "offset": [3100, 3113]}, {"key": "all-work", "type": "clause", "offset": [3178, 3186]}, {"key": "all-trips", "type": "clause", "offset": [3204, 3213]}, {"key": "heavy-rail", "type": "definition", "offset": [3357, 3367]}, {"key": "light-rail", "type": "definition", "offset": [3373, 3383]}, {"key": "july-2020", "type": "clause", "offset": [3450, 3459]}, {"key": "bus-routes", "type": "clause", "offset": [3483, 3493]}, {"key": "transit-routes", "type": "clause", "offset": [3506, 3520]}, {"key": "bus-services", "type": "clause", "offset": [3806, 3818]}, {"key": "integrated-system", "type": "definition", "offset": [3861, 3878]}, {"key": "public-transportation-services", "type": "definition", "offset": [3920, 3950]}, {"key": "access-to", "type": "definition", "offset": [3980, 3989]}, {"key": "healthy-environment", "type": "clause", "offset": [4010, 4029]}, {"key": "bus-rapid-transit", "type": "definition", "offset": [4085, 4102]}, {"key": "paratransit-services", "type": "definition", "offset": [4155, 4175]}, {"key": "rail-service", "type": "definition", "offset": [4386, 4398]}, {"key": "wheelchair-accessible", "type": "definition", "offset": [4402, 4423]}, {"key": "service-area", "type": "definition", "offset": [4546, 4558]}, {"key": "provide-a", "type": "definition", "offset": [4624, 4633]}, {"key": "qualifying-riders", "type": "definition", "offset": [4696, 4713]}, {"key": "a-week", "type": "definition", "offset": [4841, 4847]}, {"key": "rail-system", "type": "clause", "offset": [4867, 4878]}, {"key": "shopping-centers", "type": "definition", "offset": [5010, 5026]}, {"key": "days-per-week", "type": "definition", "offset": [5156, 5169]}, {"key": "peak-times", "type": "definition", "offset": [5202, 5212]}, {"key": "commuter-service", "type": "definition", "offset": [5239, 5255]}], "hash": "a9a253a1ccf98a457f97e15c02db813a", "id": 7}, {"snippet": "We identified existing cases of ITHIM applications for transportation projects and conducted in- depth analysis of the cases. Based on results of literature review, we selected three cases (i.e., greater Nashville area in Tennessee, five major California MPOs, and counties in Sacramento, California) of transportation health impacts assessment in the U.S. and examined the context of HIA applications, the assessment methods and data, and regional transportation plans and actions taken after the assessment.", "samples": [{"hash": "b0CByksJfVE", "uri": "/contracts/b0CByksJfVE#case-studies", "label": "Technical Memorandum", "score": 31.9823188782, "published": true}, {"hash": "26ceynVPPe6", "uri": "/contracts/26ceynVPPe6#case-studies", "label": "Technical Memorandum", "score": 31.9823188782, "published": true}], "size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "applications-for", "type": "clause", "offset": [38, 54]}, {"key": "transportation-projects", "type": "clause", "offset": [55, 78]}, {"key": "the-cases", "type": "clause", "offset": [115, 124]}, {"key": "based-on", "type": "definition", "offset": [126, 134]}, {"key": "literature-review", "type": "definition", "offset": [146, 163]}, {"key": "the-us", "type": "clause", "offset": [348, 355]}, {"key": "the-context", "type": "clause", "offset": [370, 381]}, {"key": "assessment-methods", "type": "definition", "offset": [407, 425]}, {"key": "plans-and", "type": "definition", "offset": [464, 473]}, {"key": "actions-taken", "type": "clause", "offset": [474, 487]}], "hash": "0a90d667dec52a5d3569962e71d84bac", "id": 10}, {"snippet": "Bolster may request the Customer participate in a case study of the project including an interview and photo shoot. Participation by the Customer is of course optional.", "samples": [{"hash": "4uuaTXDm1lv", "uri": "/contracts/4uuaTXDm1lv#case-studies", "label": "Project Contract", "score": 23.8966464996, "published": true}, {"hash": "YWzWH38koA", "uri": "/contracts/YWzWH38koA#case-studies", "label": "Project Contract", "score": 21.9527721405, "published": true}], "size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "participate-in", "type": "definition", "offset": [33, 47]}, {"key": "case-study", "type": "clause", "offset": [50, 60]}, {"key": "the-project", "type": "clause", "offset": [64, 75]}, {"key": "an-interview", "type": "clause", "offset": [86, 98]}, {"key": "photo-shoot", "type": "definition", "offset": [103, 114]}, {"key": "by-the-customer", "type": "clause", "offset": [130, 145]}], "hash": "671da701e46f39ab0895c26929a26c3c", "id": 8}, {"snippet": "In Belgium, a playing street is a public road that is temporarily blocked by crush barriers for a certain time. The crush barriers are equipped with C3 traffic signs with an extra sign displaying \u201cplaying street\u201d (KB, 28 October 1998). The playing street is known in several municipalities and has different appearances. Here you\u2019ll find some examples to get an idea.", "samples": [{"hash": "4cVkJ6oMmSq", "uri": "/contracts/4cVkJ6oMmSq#case-studies", "label": "Grant Agreement", "score": 20.2511978149, "published": true}, {"hash": "4cISIusHQ84", "uri": "/contracts/4cISIusHQ84#case-studies", "label": "Grant Agreement", "score": 20.2511978149, "published": true}], "size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "traffic-signs", "type": "clause", "offset": [152, 165]}, {"key": "some-examples", "type": "clause", "offset": [338, 351]}], "hash": "2b05177a33e9e67af2e4d477789dce50", "id": 6}], "next_curs": "ClUST2oVc35sYXdpbnNpZGVyY29udHJhY3RzcjELEhZDbGF1c2VTbmlwcGV0R3JvdXBfdjU2IhVjYXNlLXN0dWRpZXMjMDAwMDAwMGEMogECZW4YACAA", "clause": {"size": 96, "children": [["", ""], ["early-2007-the-b-method-and-railway-domain", "Early 2007 - The B Method and railway domain"], ["methodology", "Methodology"], ["early-2010-a-methodological-approach-to-a-b-formalization", "Early 2010 - A Methodological Approach to a B Formalization"], ["horizontal-refinements", "Horizontal refinements"]], "parents": [["general-provisions", "General Provisions"], ["marketing-and-publicity", "Marketing and Publicity"], ["txdot-reserved-rights", "TxDOT RESERVED RIGHTS"], ["qualification-submittal", "Qualification Submittal"], ["project-advertising", "Project Advertising"]], "title": "Case Studies", "id": "case-studies", "related": [["study", "Study", "Study"], ["feasibility-study", "Feasibility Study", "Feasibility Study"], ["trials", "Trials", "Trials"], ["clinical-studies", "Clinical Studies", "Clinical Studies"], ["studies", "Studies", "Studies"]], "related_snippets": [], "updated": "2025-07-24T06:49:03+00:00", "also_ask": ["What strategic value do case study clauses add in negotiations or dispute resolution?", "Which essential elements must be included to ensure enforceability of a case studies clause?", "What are the main legal risks or confidentiality pitfalls in sharing case studies?", "How do case study clauses differ across jurisdictions or industry standards?", "How have courts interpreted and enforced case study clauses in past disputes?"], "drafting_tip": "Specify the purpose and permitted uses of case studies to prevent misuse; obtain consent for publication to protect confidentiality; define ownership of materials to clarify rights.", "explanation": "The Case Studies clause authorizes one party, typically the service provider, to use details of the project or engagement as examples in marketing materials or future proposals. This clause often outlines what information can be shared, such as project scope or outcomes, and may require the removal of confidential or identifying details unless explicit consent is given. Its core function is to allow the provider to demonstrate expertise and past successes to potential clients while balancing the need to protect sensitive client information."}, "json": true, "cursor": ""}}