California Department of Fish and Wildlife. ● CDFW will assign a PM with responsibilities for ensuring CDFW coordinates and collaborates in an ef ective manner and communicates status internally and with other agencies. ● CDFW will identify an Executive Sponsor with authorities and responsibilities for addressing policy-level issues as appropriate, coordinating with the Parties to this Memorandum as needed to complete tasks described in this Memorandum and to identify and resolve issues. ● CDFW will provide input, specifically as it relates to species within its jurisdiction, related to the development ofalternatives for NEPA and a Proposed Action for the BA. ● CDFW will participate as a NEPA cooperating agency during Reclamation’s development ofan EIS. ● CDFW will work with the PWAs, DWR, USFWS, and NMFS to coordinate CESA authorization for the SWP.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. CDFW authority is pursuant to CESA and its role as the trustee for the State’s fish and wildlife resources, set out in California Fish and Game Code, sections 711.7 and 1802.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. CDFW is the agency of the state of California authorized to act as trustee for the state’s wildlife. CDFW is authorized to approve NCCP Plans pursuant to the NCCPA, administer and enforce CESA and other provisions of the Fish and Game Code, and enter into agreements with federal and local governments and other entities for the conservation of species and habitats pursuant to CESA and the NCCPA.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. California State Lands Commission; and California Department of Transportation, District 6, District 7, District 8, and District 9; and has invited them to sign this Agreement as Concurring Parties; and
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Technical Representative(s) Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Ph.D. Acting Deputy Administrator Office of Spill Prevention and Response CA Department of Fish and Wildlife 0000 X Xxxxxx XX Xxx 000000 Xxxxxxxxxx, XX 00000-0000 Phone: (000) 000-0000 xxxxx.xxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxx.xx.xxx
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Xxxxx will work with the applicant and the County to confirm the appropriate approach to determine the significance of impacts associated with Project-generated GHG emissions under CEQA. In addition, the GHG emissions impact discussion will emphasize the state’s goals to increase the contribution from renewable energy sources through the Renewables Portfolio Standard and the potential offsetting of emissions from fossil fuel-based electrical generation. Xxxxx will quantify the GHG emissions benefit associated with generation of renewable energy to be consumed in place of non-renewable electrical power. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Preparation of the Hazards and Hazardous Materials section will be based, in part, on the Phase 1 ESA prepared by the applicant team. It is assumed compliance with applicable federal, state and County ordinances and requirements could mitigate potential impacts. The County requires preparation of a Hazardous Materials Business Plan that addresses transport and storage of regulated hazardous materials; disposal of excess materials, waste, and containers; and establishes emergency response to accidents involving regulated hazardous materials along with a Spill Prevention and Response Plan designed to minimize the potential for and adverse results from spills of hazardous or toxic materials. There is the potential this section could be ‘focused’ out of further evaluation in the EIR based on the Phase 1 ESA. However, this decision will be made after review of Project information and in consultation with County staff. Noise Xxxxx will conduct an acoustical assessment for the Project. The analysis will address potential noise and vibration impacts associated with construction, vehicular traffic and long-term operation of Project facilities. The Project area is currently comprised of lands designated in the County’s General Plan as agricultural and foothill pasture. The existing campground located south of the Project area has the potential to be impacted by noise from Project-related construction activities and long-term operation of the proposed facility. Xxxxx will quantify the existing ambient acoustical conditions in the Project vicinity. This includes conducting noise level measurements at up to two (2) short-term (i.e,. 10-15 minutes) measurement locations and one (1) long-term (typically 24-hours in duration) in the Project area to establish the baseline ambient noise environment. Potential impacts at nearby noise-sensitive l...
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 1602 Permit Application To be performed by County. A-E will assist the County with minor tasks such as providing quantities or exhibits for permit applications, as requested by County.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. ● CDFW shall assign a PM with responsibilities for… ● CDFW shall identify an Executive Sponsor with authorities and responsibilities for... ● CDFW shall provide input, specifically as it relates to species within its jurisdiction, related to the development ofalternatives for NEPA and a Proposed Action for the BA. ● CDFW shall participate as a NEPA cooperating agency during Reclamation’s development ofan EIS. ● CDFW will work with DWR, USFWS, and NMFS to coordinate appropriate CESA compliance, ifnecessary.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Xxxxxxx X.X., X.X. Xxxxxxxx, and J.R. Xxxxx (2002) Plasticity in vertical migration by native and exotic estuarine fishes in a dynamic low-salinity zone. Limnology and Oceanography 47: 1496-1507. Xxxxxxx, X. and X. Xxxxx (2014). Riders on the storm: selective tidal movements facilitate the spawning migration of threatened Delta smelt in the San Francisco Estuary. Estuaries and Coasts. DOI 10.1007/s12237-014-9877-3. Xxxxxx S.C., X. Xxxxxxx, X.X. Xxxxxxxx, X.X. Xxxxxx, X. Xxx, and X.X. Xxxxxxxx (2015) Ten real-time PCR assays for detection of fish predation at the community level in the San Francisco Estuary-Delta. Molecular Ecology Resources 15: 278-284. Xxxxxxx, R.E., Xxxxxxx, S.D. and Xxxxx, X.X., 2012. Straying of hatchery salmon in Prince Xxxxxxx Sound, Alaska. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 94(1), pp.179-195. California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) (2009a). Report to the Fish and Game Commission: A status review of the Longfin Smelt (Spirinchus thaleichthys) in California. Report to the Fish and Game Commission: 46 pages. California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) (2009b). Effects Analysis -- State Water Project Effects on Longfin Smelt, California Department of Fish and Game: 58 pages plus appendices. CDFW (2014). Longfin Smelt Study Plan: Field, laboratory, and data analyses to investigate the distribution and abundance of Longfin Smelt in the San-Francisco Estuary: 43.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Oversight Group: Working Group: Public Outreach Sub-Group: NEPA Review Sub-Group: California Department of Transportation Oversight Group: Working Group: Public Outreach Sub-Group: NEPA Review Sub-Group: Nevada Department of Wildlife Oversight Group: Working Group: Public Outreach Sub-Group: NEPA Review Sub-Group: Nevada Department of Transportation Oversight Group: Working Group: Public Outreach Sub-Group: NEPA Review Sub-Group: Utah Department of Natural Resources Oversight Group: Working Group: Public Outreach Sub-Group: NEPA Review Sub-Group: Utah Department of Transportation Oversight Group: Working Group: Public Outreach Sub-Group: NEPA Review Sub-Group: Local Governments and Tribal Governments Oversight Group: Working Group: Public Outreach Sub-Group: NEPA Review Sub-Group:
