Budget Narrative. Services are strictly paid as cost reimbursement. No funds will be paid for services not provided.
Budget Narrative. Applicants must submit an itemized budget narrative. When developing the budget narrative, applicants must consider whether the proposed budget is reasonable and consistent with the purpose, outcomes, and program strategy outlined in the project narrative. The budget must include: Salaries and wages Fringe benefits Consultant costs Equipment Supplies Travel Other categories Contractual costs Total Direct costs Total Indirect costs Indirect costs could include the cost of collecting, managing, sharing and preserving data. Indirect costs on grants awarded to foreign organizations and foreign public entities and performed fully outside of the territorial limits of the U.S. may be paid to support the costs of compliance with federal requirements at a fixed rate of eight percent of MTDC exclusive of tuition and related fees, direct expenditures for equipment, and subawards in excess of $25,000. Negotiated indirect costs may be paid to the American University, Beirut, and the World Health Organization. If applicable and consistent with the cited statutory authority for this announcement, applicant entities may use funds for activities as they relate to the intent of this NOFO to meet national standards or seek health department accreditation through the Public Health Accreditation Board (see: xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxx.xxx). Applicant entities to whom this provision applies include state, local, territorial governments (including the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianna Islands, American Samoa, Guam, the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Xxxxxxxx Islands, and the Republic of Palau), or their bona fide agents, political subdivisions of states (in consultation with states), federally recognized or state-recognized American Indian or Alaska Native tribal governments, and American Indian or Alaska Native tribally designated organizations. Activities include those that enable a public health organization to deliver public health services such as activities that ensure a capable and qualified workforce, up-to-date information systems, and the capability to assess and respond to public health needs. Use of these funds must focus on achieving a minimum of one national standard that supports the intent of the NOFO. Proposed activities must be included in the budget narrative and must indicate which standards will be addressed. Applicants must name this file “Bud...
Budget Narrative. This Performance Partnership Agreement (PPA) covers federal fiscal years 2018 -2020 (October 1, 2017 to September 30, 2020). The PPA, together with work plans (as represented by the associated P&C List), set forth the goals, sub-goals, objectives, programs, activities, deliverables, and measures of progress to address the full range of cooperative federal-state environmental programs under the Department's jurisdiction. The PPG is a key vehicle for implementing the Agreement, in combination with other federal and state funding sources. The PPG currently combines the following federally-funded programs: • Clean Air Act Section 105 Base Grant; • Resource Conservation Recovery Act (RCRA) Grant; • Surface Water Section 106 Base Grant; • Underground Injection Control (UIC) Xxxxx; • Asbestos Grant ; • Lead Grant; • Wetlands Grant; and • Section 319(H) Nonpoint Source Grant. This Agreement does not cover all Department work funded by EPA grants. The table below lists only the grants that are included in this Agreement: Agreement Grants- Fiscal Year 2018 PPG Grant Estimated Grant Am unt End Oat 201 ) Air Section 105 $1,340,147 9/30/2018 RCRA $520,394 9/30/2018 Surface Water Section 106 $2,349,485 9/30/2018 UIC Grant $58,000 9/30/2018 Asbestos Grant $97,000 9/30/2018 Lead Grant $216,000 9/30/2018 Wetlands Grant $173,597 9/30/2018 Nonpoint Source Section 319(H) Grant $1,873,001 9/30/2018 The Agreement and the associated work plans also include additional non-PPG funded work that is necessary to accomplish the environmental and public health goals set forth in the Department's and EPA's Strategic Plans. MEDEP and EPA will continue to explore opportunities for grant efficiencies, and measurement of environmental results. Consistent with GP/ 12-06, Timely Obligation, Award, and Expenditure of USEPA Grant Funds, for multi-year awards, MEDEP should apply for the total amount of funds expected for the period covered by the award and include any required match in the application. The work plan should also cover the same time period. EPA will fund the application incrementally as funds become available. To be allowable under Federal awards, costs must meet the following general criteria, found in 2 CFR Part 200 (Subpart E), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirementsfor Federal Award: • Be necessary and reasonable for proper and efficient performance and administration of Federal awards. • Be allocable to Federal awards under the provisions o...
Budget Narrative. Applicants must submit an itemized budget narrative. When developing the budget narrative, applicants must consider whether the proposed budget is reasonable and consistent with the purpose, outcomes, and program strategy outlined in the project narrative. The budget must include: • Salaries and wages • Fringe benefits • Consultant costs • Equipment • Supplies • Travel • Other categories • Contractual costs • Total Direct costs • Total Indirect costs The budget can include both direct costs and indirect costs as allowed. Indirect costs could include the cost of collecting, managing, sharing and preserving data. • Indirect costs on grants awarded to foreign organizations and foreign public entities and performed fully outside of the territorial limits of the U.S. may be paid to support the costs of compliance with federal requirements at a fixed rate of eight percent of modified total direct costs exclusive of tuition and related fees, direct expenditures for equipment, and subawards in excess of $25,000. Negotiated indirect costs may be paid to the American University, Beirut, and the World Health Organization. • If requesting indirect costs in the budget, a copy of the indirect cost rate agreement is required. Include a copy of the current negotiated federal indirect cost rate agreement or cost allocation plan approval letter. The applicant can obtain guidance for completing a detailed justified budget on the CDC website, at the following Internet address: xxxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx/grants/documents/Budget-Preparation-Guidance.docx Additional information submitted via Xxxxxx.xxx must be uploaded in a PDF file format, and should be named: "Indirect Cost Rate Agreement" No more than 10 electronic attachments should be uploaded per application.
Budget Narrative. The Parties intend to share resources as identified in the “Resources Required” section of this agreement. Because the level of support offered by each party may vary from year to year, at the beginning of each fiscal year the Parties must cooperate to plan and document the specific resources allocated for that year’s performance.
Budget Narrative. The budget narrative should describe how the funds requested for each line item will be spent and how that amount was determined. For example, if you are requesting reimbursement for a clinic visit, please describe how $X amount per visit was determined. If matching funds have been secured, identify the amount and the source of the matching funds.
Budget Narrative. A brief narrative explanation and justification for each line item must be included in a separate section entitled “budget notes” and include data to support actual costs and/or methodologies to support cost estimates. Budget notes serve as justification for each cost included in a budget; they should be presented in such a way as to be easily referenced from the budget; and they should provide sufficient information so that FHI 360 may sufficiently review a proposed budget for reasonableness. All projected costs must be in accordance with the vendor’s standard practices and policies.
Budget Narrative. The Budget Narrative should thoroughly and clearly justify or explain each Budget Category (Object Class) and follow all guidelines and limitations as provided in the application package. The Budget Narrative must be clear, specific, detailed, and mathematically correct; it should correspond to the information and figures on the budget forms. A well-written Budget Narrative allows the Applicant and FMCSA to understand all costs included in the budget and to monitor the expenditure of funds and determine whether the budget items are allowable for reimbursement under Federal cost principles. Project Name Personnel Costs $ Fringe Benefits $ Travel $ Equipment $ Supplies $ Contractual $300,000 Construction $ Indirect Costs $ TOTAL $
Budget Narrative. The proposed budget should include only costs for activities and functionalities that are integral to Exchange operations and meeting Exchange requirements. Each applicant must submit a detailed budget narrative by Exchange Establishment Core Area and each of the Business Operations of the Exchange. The applicant must include costs by Exchange Establishment Core Area and each of the Business Operations of the Exchange, as demonstrated in Appendices E and F. Provide a narrative that explains the amounts requested for each line in the budget for the entire project period. The budget justification should specifically describe how each line item will support the achievement of proposed objectives in alignment with the Work Plan. HHS will look for justifications that directly align with the tasks in the Work Plan and should be able to understand funding needs for each set of tasks the Exchange will carry out. The Budget Narrative should break down funding needs by quarter to the extent possible. It should also clearly identify funds that were spent prior to the project period (up to 90 days prior to the start of the project period). Include a description that indicates which elements of your proposal you expect will also benefit your State’s Medicaid/CHIP system(s) and other specific health and human services programs. Include a description of your proposal for allocating costs between these sources of funding in line with the cost-sharing/matching requirements in Section XX.0.X.xx., and an explanation of the methodology used to support the allocation is required. Include a description of the State’s capacity to oversee multiple grant funding streams if the applicant has received other grant funding from HHS. It is the responsibility of the grantee to ensure that these funding streams are maintained and accounted for separately. It is imperative that each applicant’s budget clearly distinguishes between activities that are funded using Establishing Cooperative Agreement funding and activities funded using other funding sources. Line item information must be provided to explain the costs entered in the appropriate form, Application Form 5161-1. The budget justification must clearly describe each cost element and explain how each cost contributes to meeting the project’s objectives/goals on a quarterly basis and by core area. Carefully justify each item in the ―other‖ category. The budget justification MUST be concise. Do NOT use the justification to expand the p...
Budget Narrative. Arcadia requests a grant of 1 million US dollars to partially cover the cost for project year one. The estimated requests for year 2 and year 3 of the project are 1.4 and 1.1 million US dollars, respectively. This funding will help support the proposed work plan, which is designed to accelerate a timely and broad introduction of these productivity traits into Indian varieties of rice and wheat. These funds will be shared by Arcadia and Mahyco in proportion to the costs incurred in pursuit of the USAID program objectives. The costs will correspond to the following division of tasks with partner primarily responsible indicated. […*…] = CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED BY BRACKETS, HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 406 OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED. [...*...] Arcadia and Mahyco have already made investments to date in developing these traits in rice for India. As the proposed work proceeds, Arcadia and Mahyco will make ongoing significant investments in project management and commercialization. Costs of these efforts are not captured in the funding request. [...*...] The curriculum vitae of all key scientific managers are included in the appendix. Implementation Plan
