Audits Reviews Sample Clauses

Audits Reviews. On an annual basis, no more frequently than every 12 months, upon 30 days prior written notice, City shall have the right to conduct an independent audit or review of Grantee's records reasonably related to the administration or enforcement of this agreement, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. For purposes of this section, records reasonably related to the administration and enforcement of this agreement include those financial records pertaining to the number and location of cable customers within City=s Urban Growth Boundary. The City may hire an independent certified public accountant to audit or review the Grantee's financial records, in which case the Grantee shall provide all necessary records to the certified public accountant. All such records shall be made available in the local offices of the Grantee. If the audit or review shows that Franchise fees have been underpaid by 3% or more, Grantee shall reimburse to City the total cost of the audit or review and the underpayment plus interest, at the rate specified in section 3.7 within 30 days of the City's written demand for same. Records for audit/review purposes shall include without limitation:
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Audits Reviews. The Agency shall be subject to and cooperate with an annual compliance review for non-Medicaid treatment services conducted by representatives of the Board. The review may consist of tests that verify compliance with any clause in this agreement, including determining priority clients, review of client records, compliance with assurance statements, housing referrals, and billing accuracy. The Board shall provide written notice of the review up to 30 days prior to the review. Notification of the client records to be reviewed will be provided to the Agency not more than 48 hours prior to the review. The Board shall notify the Agency of review findings no later than 30 days after completion of the review. The Board may initiate the reversal of funds for ineligible claim findings identified in the review not sooner than 30 days after the Agency is notified of the review findings. Ineligible findings shall include duplicated claims, improperly documented service claims, services provided by an ineligible provider, or services that do not meet the service standards as described in the Ohio Administrative Code (OAC). The Agency shall be responsible for responding to any findings as described in the compliance review report including a Corrective Action Plan, if requested by the Board, within 30 days of the request.
Sample 1
Audits Reviews. A. The County shall submit an annual independent audit report to the Department. Unless waived by the Department, the sub-recipient (auditee) shall submit an annual audit to the Department if the total amount of annual funding provided by the Department (from any and all of its Divisions taken collectively) for all contracts is $25,000 or more. In determining the amount of annual funding provided by the Department, the sub-recipient shall consider both: (1) funds provided through direct contracts with the Department; and (2) funds from the Department, passed through another agency that has one or more contracts with the sub-recipient.
Sample 1
Audits Reviews. Revisions 6.1 We agree to make available all information relevant to this partnership to partners as necessary 6.2 We agree to review the partnership every … months 6.3 An independent audit of the financial arrangements of the partnership (and any projects resulting from the partnership) will be undertaken on an annual basis, in the event that money is allocated by platform members to the platform facilitator or implementing partner 6.4 We agree to make adjustments to the partnership (including re-writing this agreement) should either a review or an audit indicate that this is necessary for the partnership to achieve its objectives 7.0 Caveats 7.1 This agreement does not permit the use of copyright materials (including logos) or the dissemination of confidential information to any third party without the written permission of the partner(s) concerned 7.2 This agreement does not bind partner organizations or their staff / officers to any financial or other liability without further formal documentation 8.0 Duration 8.1 This MOU is at-will and may be modified by mutual consent of authorized officials from (list partners). 8.2 This MOU shall become effective upon signature by the authorized officials from the (list partners) and will remain in effect until modified or terminated by any one of the partners by mutual consent. 8.3 In the absence of mutual agreement by the authorized officials from (list partners) this MOU shall end on (end date of partnership). Date: (Partner signature) (Partner name, organization, position) Date: (Partner signature) (Partner name, organization, position) Date: (Partner signature) (Partner name, organization, position)
Sample 1
Audits Reviews 
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (53)

Related to Audits Reviews

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • BUSINESS REVIEWS Vendor must perform a minimum of one business review with Sourcewell per contract year. The business review will cover sales to Participating Entities, pricing and contract terms, administrative fees, supply issues, customer issues, and any other necessary information.

  • Reviews (a) During the term of this Agreement and for 7 years after the term of this Agreement, the HSP agrees that the LHIN or its authorized representatives may conduct a Review of the HSP to confirm the HSP’s fulfillment of its obligations under this Agreement. For these purposes the LHIN or its authorized representatives may, upon 24 hours’ Notice to the HSP and during normal business hours enter the HSP’s premises to:

  • Business Review Meetings In order to maintain the relationship between the Department and the Contractor, each quarter the Department may request a business review meeting. The business review meeting may include, but is not limited to, the following: • Successful completion of deliverables • Review of the Contractor’s performance • Review of minimum required reports • Addressing of any elevated Customer issues • Review of continuous improvement ideas that may help lower total costs and improve business efficiencies.

  • Performance Reviews The Employee will be provided with a written performance appraisal at least once per year and said appraisal will be reviewed at which time all aspects of the assessment can be fully discussed.

  • Periodic Reviews During January of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall review Executive's Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and additional benefits then being provided to Executive. Following each such review, the Company may in its discretion increase the Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and benefits; however, the Company shall not decrease such items during the period Executive serves as an employee of the Company. Prior to November 30th of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall communicate in writing the results of such review to Executive.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Documents Reviewed We have reviewed originals, copies, drafts or conformed copies of the following documents:

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

  • Review The practitioner reviews the treatment plan and discusses, when appropriate, case circumstances and management options with the attending (or referring) physician. The reviewer consults with the requesting physician when more clarity is needed to make an informed coverage decision. The reviewer may consult with board certified physicians from appropriate specialty areas to assist in making determinations of coverage and/or appropriateness. All such consultations will be documented in the review text. If the reviewer determines that the admission, continued stay or service requested is not a covered service, a notice of non-coverage is issued. Only a physician, behavioral health practitioner (such as a psychiatrist, doctoral-level clinical psychologist, certified addiction medicine specialist), dentist or pharmacist who has the clinical expertise appropriate to the request under review with an unrestricted license may deny coverage based on medical necessity.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.