Assessment Activities. The Trustees may enter into funding and participation agreements with one or more PRP(s) to fund NRDAR-related activities. Any agreement will address the terms of the monetary disbursement and the level of technical PRP participation. The Trustees acknowledge that payments and/or promises of goods and services for NRDAR-related activities pursuant to any funding and participation agreement, exclusive of the individual costs of their participation, are intended for the joint and undivided use and benefit of all the Trustees acting cooperatively in planning, coordinating and conducting joint Trustee NRDAR-related activities. Prior to the receipt of any such funds, the Trustee Council will, by resolution, determine the appropriate place for the deposit of funds and appropriate activities for the expenditure of these funds recognizing that legal authority may restrict where such funds can be held. Any interest earned on the money deposited in the agreed upon depository shall be credited to the fund and shall be subject to the terms of this MOA. The Trustees will evaluate the most effective means for recovery of their individual costs of participation and seek recovery of these costs through agreement(s) with one or more PRP (s). The Trustees further acknowledge that each Trustee may seek individual reimbursement from any PRP for NRDAR-related activities unanimously approved by the Trustee Council but separately financed by the individual Trustee. However, prior to seeking reimbursement, the Trustee will provide notice and an accounting of the monies sought to the Trustee Council. Additionally, the Trustees will be responsible for maintaining their own accounting for the costs of their participation. The LAT will be responsible for keeping an accounting of any agreed upon joint NRDAR-related activities. It is the goal of the Trustees to minimize administrative costs.
Assessment Activities. WP7 -Evidence gathering and evaluation report This work package is dedicated to pilot evaluation activities. The evaluation of the various trials will be conducted using the MAST (Model for Assessment of Telemedicine) multidimensional evaluation methodology, developed under contract with the European Commission (MethoTelemed project) and based on HTA (Health Technology Assessment). In MAST, evaluation work is seen as a multi-disciplinary process that summarises and evaluates information about the medical, social, economic and ethical issues related to the use of telemedicine in a systematic, unbiased, robust manner. The MAST approach will specifically be tailored to the requirements of the project. Also, the MAST model ensures that the evaluation will cover all services and all stakeholder perspectives.
Assessment Activities. How will we determine if participants a) have reached curriculum objectives identified in number 2 above; and b) can answer the questions in number 3.
Assessment Activities. The sections below describe the detailed assessment activities, purpose and limitations.
Assessment Activities. Includes all supporting activities other than assessment research, including, but not limited to, assisting sections design their assessment approaches, fulfilling reporting requirements, presenting oral feedback during debriefs, reviewing curricula, etc. Assessment activities may take place at the levels of the individual learner, class/course/curriculum, initiative, program, organization, and enterprise.
Assessment Activities. The Contractor will conduct face-to-face assessments on Company’s members using Contractor’s Assessment tools and Company’s Pilot HRA wherever the member is located when possible. These assessments determine the member’s medical, behavioral health, and social services needs, if any. Contractor will obtain a release of information from the member and then submit completed ILP, Pilot HRA and Transition Care Plan (only for those Care1st members in skilled nursing facilities (SNF’s), rehabilitation hospitals, and acute-care hospitals that wish to transition into the community) and other relevant information (to determine service needs) to via fax or another process, as agreed upon by the parties.
Assessment Activities. To accomplish the objectives of C-1.1, the following will be conducted as set forth in the following table.
Assessment Activities. The assessment activities include at least the following:
Assessment Activities. As part of the assessment pathway, DHHR has decided to use an additional standardized assessment tool, in addition to the CANS. The CAFAS, Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale for children ages 7-20, and the PECFAS, Preschool and Early Childhood Functional Assessment Scale, for youth aged 3–6, will be collected as part of the CSED Waiver eligibility determination. Referrals for the CSED Waiver are made to KEPRO, who will conduct the CAFAS/PECFAS telephonically with families to determine if a child should be further referred to a CSED Waiver independent evaluator. If a child receives a score of 90 or above, KEPRO will assist the family to schedule an appointment with an independent evaluator. If the child scores below 90, KEPRO will assist the family to find other services. Additionally, DHHR has proposed use of the scores from the CAFAS/PECFAS to determine if a child meets the defined class of children under the DOJ Agreement target population definition. Please see the Target Population section on page 7 for additional information regarding target population definition.
