Arguments. ratingsGr1 matrix of subjects x raters for 1st group of raters ratingsGr2 matrix of subjects x raters for 2nd group of raters ratingScale character vector of the levels for the rating. Or NULL. weights optional weighting schemes: "unweighted", "linear","quadratic" conf.level confidence level for interval estimation Data need to be stored with raters in columns. list. kappa agreement between two groups of raters ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, S., ▇▇▇▇▇▇, A. Agreement between Two Independent Groups of Raters. Psychometrika 74, 477–491 (2009). doi:10.1007/s1133600991161 # compare rater1-rater2 vs rater3-rater6 from diagnoses-data # (there is no systematic difference between both groups #+as the raters are randomly selected per subject) kappam_vanbelle(diagnoses[,1:2], diagnoses[,3:6])
Appears in 2 contracts
Sources: Agreement of Nominal Scale Raters With a Gold Standard, Title Agreement of Nominal Scale Raters With a Gold Standard