Antitrust Law. 55 beneficial owner.........................................................67 beneficially owned.......................................................67
Antitrust Law. 51 APB 16.................................................................56
Antitrust Law. Any applicable pre-merger notification provisions of Section 7A of the Xxxxxxx Act shall have been complied with by the parties hereto, and no other statutory or regulatory requirements with respect to the Xxxxxxx Act shall be applicable other than Section 18(c) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and rules and regulations in connection therewith. There shall be no pending or threatened proceedings by the California Attorney General or any other public entity under any applicable antitrust law of the State of California.
Antitrust Law. The principal usually has an interest in coordinating its distributors by assigning them specific territories, specific sectors or buying groups. An entrepreneur is generally free to determine and coordinate its distribution channels. Yet, where the principal’s coordination of its distribution channels contains restraints of com- petition, these agreements between principal and distributor may be prohibited and therefore be void depending on the severity of the restraints and the market strength of the parties (principal and distributor) involved. Thus, the general con- cept of antitrust law is briefly discussed below insofar as vertical restraints are concerned. Moreover, particular scenarios referring to the business cooperation between the principal (also referred to as supplier or manufacturer here) and its distributors will be discussed below.
Antitrust Law. All (i) waiting periods applicable to the Transactions under the HSR Act (and any extension thereof, including under any agreement between a Party and a Governmental Authority agreeing not to consummate the Transactions prior to a certain date) shall have expired or been terminated and (ii) other Authorizations set forth on Schedule 7.1.2 with respect to any other applicable Antitrust Law shall have been received (or been deemed to have been received by virtue of the expiration (including under any agreement between a Party and a Governmental Authority agreeing not to consummate the Transactions) or termination of any applicable waiting period).
Antitrust Law. Under the provisions of the HSR Act applicable to the Offer, the acquisition of Shares under the Offer may be consummated after the expiration of a 15-calendar day waiting period commenced by the filing of a Notification and Report Form, which is required to be filed by Nestle as the ultimate parent entity of Parent, with respect to the Offer, unless Nestle receives a request for additional information or documentary material from the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice or the Federal Trade Commission (the "FTC") or unless early termination of the waiting period is granted. Nestle is in the process of preparing such filing. If, within the initial 15-day waiting period, either the Antitrust Division or the FTC requests additional information from Parent concerning the Offer, the waiting period will be extended and would expire at 11:59 p.m., New York City time, on the tenth calendar day after the date of substantial compliance by Nestle with such request. Only one extension of the waiting period pursuant to a request for additional information is authorized by the HSR Act. Thereafter, such waiting period may be extended only by court order or with the consent of Nestle. In practice, complying with a request for additional information or material can take a significant amount of time. In addition, if the Antitrust Division or the FTC raises substantive issues in connection with a proposed transaction, the parties frequently engage in negotiations with the relevant governmental agency concerning possible means of addressing those issues and may agree to delay consummation of the transaction while such negotiations continue. Expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period under the HSR Act is a condition to the Purchaser's obligation to accept for payment and pay for Shares tendered pursuant to the Offer. The Merger will not require an additional filing under the HSR Act if the Purchaser owns 50% or more of the outstanding Shares at the time of the Merger or if the Merger occurs within one year after the HSR Act waiting period applicable to the Offer expires or is terminated. The Antitrust Division and the FTC frequently scrutinize the legality under the antitrust laws of transactions such as the Purchaser's proposed acquisition of the Company. At any time before or after the Purchaser's acquisition of Shares pursuant to the Offer, the Antitrust Division or the FTC could take such action under the antitrust laws as it deems necessary or ...
Antitrust Law. Any applicable pre-merger notification provisions of Section 7A of the Xxxxxxx Act shall have been complied with by the parties hereto, and no other statutory or regulatory requirements with respect to the Xxxxxxx Act shall be applicable. There shall be no pending or threatened proceedings under any applicable antitrust law of the State of Washington or California.
Antitrust Law. For the avoidance of doubt: The Parties understand and agree that they have to adhere to the applicable antitrust laws. Information which is sensitive under the applicable antitrust laws shall only be exchanged if it is necessary for the performance of the tasks under this CA and within the boundaries of antitrust laws.
Antitrust Law. 39 APB 16:..........................................................43
Antitrust Law. 18 Assets ......................................................................7
