{"component": "clause", "props": {"groups": [{"samples": [{"hash": "aUi1amwB6sE", "uri": "/contracts/aUi1amwB6sE#alternative-methods", "label": "Collective Bargaining Agreement", "score": 28.8035290056, "published": true}, {"hash": "c9cTwlG88Ft", "uri": "/contracts/c9cTwlG88Ft#alternative-methods", "label": "Collective Bargaining Agreement", "score": 25.6144957747, "published": true}, {"hash": "89U2MOIOhZ6", "uri": "/contracts/89U2MOIOhZ6#alternative-methods", "label": "Collective Bargaining Agreement", "score": 24.5633466239, "published": true}], "snippet": "The parties may mutually agree to by-pass any step or to use alternative methods in settling grievances.", "size": 11, "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-parties", "type": "definition", "offset": [0, 11]}, {"key": "agree-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [25, 33]}, {"key": "settling-grievances", "type": "clause", "offset": [84, 103]}], "hash": "b64278746090dabbc3ba5c877d47a84d", "id": 1}, {"samples": [{"hash": "1csU5oqR7KW", "uri": "/contracts/1csU5oqR7KW#alternative-methods", "label": "Program Protocol", "score": 20.704312115, "published": true}, {"hash": "fCgoS4WJ7KW", "uri": "/contracts/fCgoS4WJ7KW#alternative-methods", "label": "Program Protocol", "score": 20.659137577, "published": true}, {"hash": "7xjGM9a5Z3W", "uri": "/contracts/7xjGM9a5Z3W#alternative-methods", "label": "Program Protocol", "score": 20.659137577, "published": true}], "snippet": "Currently, DHS undertakes similar matching to this program under the Data-matching Program (Assistance and Tax) Act 1990. (DMP). While the DMP addresses similar compliance risks, restriction of the Act has meant overtime, that DHS haven\u2019t been able to introduce efficiencies developed in other matching programs. This has led to DHS\u2019s activity under the DMP to become inefficient for customers and third parties as well as DHS itself when compared to the other compliance activity. The NEIDM program not only opens the door for DHS to recognise efficiencies, it will form part of DHS\u2019s innovative compliance platform for the future. DHS\u2019s will be able to address significantly more non-compliance and do so by empowering customers with more information. It is not possible to conduct this type of compliance activity without the exchange and matching of data. The NEIDM program represent the most efficient and effective alternative to address compliance related to un/under-declared income.", "size": 3, "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-data", "type": "clause", "offset": [65, 73]}, {"key": "matching-program", "type": "clause", "offset": [74, 90]}, {"key": "compliance-risks", "type": "clause", "offset": [161, 177]}, {"key": "the-act", "type": "clause", "offset": [194, 201]}, {"key": "for-customers", "type": "clause", "offset": [380, 393]}, {"key": "third-parties", "type": "clause", "offset": [398, 411]}, {"key": "other-compliance", "type": "clause", "offset": [455, 471]}, {"key": "the-future", "type": "clause", "offset": [621, 631]}, {"key": "more-information", "type": "definition", "offset": [736, 752]}, {"key": "type-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [789, 796]}, {"key": "the-exchange", "type": "clause", "offset": [825, 837]}, {"key": "related-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [955, 965]}], "hash": "d7bb46dba41f3b5399408ab607228ce0", "id": 2}, {"samples": [{"hash": "4uS8LmliI7l", "uri": "/contracts/4uS8LmliI7l#alternative-methods", "label": "Collective Bargaining Agreement", "score": 25.9144421629, "published": true}, {"hash": "jJitPk3wiaO", "uri": "/contracts/jJitPk3wiaO#alternative-methods", "label": "Tentative Agreement", "score": 19.1464750171, "published": true}], "snippet": "A department may, by majority employee vote, decide to use an alternative method. The method must be decided at the time of the vote and will be in effect for the life of the contract. The Employer must be notified by the Union that a particular department is using an alternative method voted in by that department\u2019s employees.", "size": 3, "snippet_links": [{"key": "alternative-method", "type": "clause", "offset": [62, 80]}, {"key": "the-method", "type": "definition", "offset": [82, 92]}, {"key": "time-of-the", "type": "clause", "offset": [116, 127]}, {"key": "in-effect", "type": "definition", "offset": [145, 154]}, {"key": "life-of-the-contract", "type": "clause", "offset": [163, 183]}, {"key": "the-employer-must", "type": "clause", "offset": [185, 202]}, {"key": "by-the-union", "type": "clause", "offset": [215, 227]}], "hash": "5e218db12689aff5d7daba943e3a4260", "id": 3}, {"samples": [{"hash": "4uS8LmliI7l", "uri": "/contracts/4uS8LmliI7l#alternative-methods", "label": "Collective Bargaining Agreement", "score": 25.9144421629, "published": true}, {"hash": "jJitPk3wiaO", "uri": "/contracts/jJitPk3wiaO#alternative-methods", "label": "Tentative Agreement", "score": 19.1464750171, "published": true}], "snippet": "1. Bargaining unit employees in a department may use an alternative method if a majority of the affected bargaining unit employees agree. The Union will conduct the vote. The method must be decided at the time of the vote, and will be in effect for the life of the contract.\n2. The Employer must be notified by the Union that a particular department is using an alternative method voted in by that department\u2019s bargaining unit employees.\n3. Vacations the week of Christmas and New Year\u2019s for nursing staff shall continue. The employee must find their own coverage for the requested period to be approved but are allowed to access per diem employees for coverage", "size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "employees-in", "type": "clause", "offset": [19, 31]}, {"key": "alternative-method", "type": "clause", "offset": [56, 74]}, {"key": "a-majority", "type": "clause", "offset": [78, 88]}, {"key": "the-method", "type": "definition", "offset": [171, 181]}, {"key": "time-of-the", "type": "clause", "offset": [205, 216]}, {"key": "in-effect", "type": "definition", "offset": [235, 244]}, {"key": "life-of-the-contract", "type": "clause", "offset": [253, 273]}, {"key": "the-employer-must", "type": "clause", "offset": [278, 295]}, {"key": "by-the-union", "type": "clause", "offset": [308, 320]}, {"key": "the-week", "type": "clause", "offset": [451, 459]}, {"key": "christmas-and-new-year", "type": "clause", "offset": [463, 485]}, {"key": "nursing-staff", "type": "definition", "offset": [492, 505]}, {"key": "the-employee-must", "type": "clause", "offset": [522, 539]}, {"key": "coverage-for-the", "type": "clause", "offset": [555, 571]}, {"key": "per-diem-employees", "type": "clause", "offset": [630, 648]}], "hash": "920eb545afd3cb5a5be47832a7f4e2e0", "id": 4}, {"samples": [{"hash": "jcP0QH6WPvB", "uri": "/contracts/jcP0QH6WPvB#alternative-methods", "label": "Employment Agreement", "score": 30.0699144941, "published": true}, {"hash": "l1WWDDLlC1w", "uri": "/contracts/l1WWDDLlC1w#alternative-methods", "label": "Collective Bargaining Agreement", "score": 24.787816564, "published": true}], "snippet": "Upon mutual agreement, an alternative method of bargaining may be used.", "size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "upon-mutual-agreement", "type": "clause", "offset": [0, 21]}, {"key": "method-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [38, 47]}], "hash": "dc659086ca7c85b89359d8d992cec08c", "id": 5}, {"samples": [{"hash": "8jSUpi3kHkP", "uri": "/contracts/8jSUpi3kHkP#alternative-methods", "label": "Defined Contribution Plan and Trust (National Penn Bancshares Inc)", "score": 19.0, "published": true}, {"hash": "8a5nbZaXcGR", "uri": "/contracts/8a5nbZaXcGR#alternative-methods", "label": "Defined Contribution Prototype Plan and Trust Agreement (Mercantile Bancorp, Inc.)", "score": 19.0, "published": true}], "snippet": "The Employer may elect under Part 13, #54.c. of the Agreement [Part 13, #72.c. of the 401(k) Agreement] to modify the default rules under this subsection (f). For example, the Employer may elect to attribute any Excess Amount which is allocated on the same date to this Plan and to another plan maintained by the Employer by designating the specific plan to which the Excess Amount is allocated or by using a pro rata allocation method. Under the pro rata allocation method, the Excess Amount attributed to this Plan is the product of:\n(i) the total Excess Amount allocated as of such date, times\n(ii) the ratio of (A) the Annual Additions allocated to the Participant for the Limitation Year as of such date under this Plan to (B) the total Annual Additions allocated to the Participant for the Limitation Year as of such date under this and all other Defined Contribution Plans.", "size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-employer-may", "type": "clause", "offset": [0, 16]}, {"key": "part-13", "type": "definition", "offset": [29, 36]}, {"key": "the-agreement", "type": "clause", "offset": [48, 61]}, {"key": "default-rules", "type": "clause", "offset": [118, 131]}, {"key": "this-subsection", "type": "definition", "offset": [138, 153]}, {"key": "for-example", "type": "definition", "offset": [159, 170]}, {"key": "excess-amount", "type": "clause", "offset": [212, 225]}, {"key": "this-plan", "type": "definition", "offset": [265, 274]}, {"key": "another-plan", "type": "clause", "offset": [282, 294]}, {"key": "by-the-employer", "type": "clause", "offset": [306, 321]}, {"key": "specific-plan", "type": "clause", "offset": [341, 354]}, {"key": "the-excess", "type": "clause", "offset": [364, 374]}, {"key": "pro-rata-allocation-method", "type": "clause", "offset": [409, 435]}, {"key": "the-product", "type": "clause", "offset": [520, 531]}, {"key": "the-total", "type": "clause", "offset": [540, 549]}, {"key": "ratio-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [606, 614]}, {"key": "annual-additions", "type": "definition", "offset": [623, 639]}, {"key": "allocated-to", "type": "definition", "offset": [640, 652]}, {"key": "the-participant", "type": "clause", "offset": [653, 668]}, {"key": "limitation-year", "type": "definition", "offset": [677, 692]}, {"key": "other-defined-contribution-plans", "type": "clause", "offset": [847, 879]}], "hash": "7cc44b8af9bb8dde922147b5520bba9d", "id": 6}, {"samples": [{"hash": "5hC9aF69we9", "uri": "/contracts/5hC9aF69we9#alternative-methods", "label": "Agreement Concerning the Adoption of Uniform Conditions of Approval and Reciprocal Recognition of Approval for Motor Vehicle Equipment and Parts", "score": 21.0, "published": true}, {"hash": "65RB5OBPpv1", "uri": "/contracts/65RB5OBPpv1#alternative-methods", "label": "Agreement Concerning the Adoption of Uniform Technical Prescriptions for Wheeled Vehicles", "score": 19.0, "published": true}], "snippet": "If it can be shown that alternative technology (e.g. computer, electronically controlled range switch, etc.) can give equivalent accuracy, then these alternatives may be used.", "size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "alternative-technology", "type": "definition", "offset": [24, 46]}], "hash": "b7bb88df4850199d361d11861e5bc064", "id": 7}, {"samples": [{"hash": "bX58Av7CO37", "uri": "/contracts/bX58Av7CO37#alternative-methods", "label": "Maintenance Agreement", "score": 28.4237408774, "published": true}, {"hash": "48tegNGAJl6", "uri": "/contracts/48tegNGAJl6#alternative-methods", "label": "Maintenance Agreement", "score": 24.7125256674, "published": true}], "snippet": "of Resolution Notwithstanding any/all contrary provisions of Article 22, the parties reserve the right to mutually agree on an alternative grievance resolution process (including but not limited to referring the matter to a single arbitrator), in which case the associated fees and expenses of such alternative process shall be borne equally by the parties to the grievance.", "size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "article-22", "type": "definition", "offset": [61, 71]}, {"key": "right-to", "type": "definition", "offset": [97, 105]}, {"key": "mutually-agree", "type": "definition", "offset": [106, 120]}, {"key": "grievance-resolution-process", "type": "clause", "offset": [139, 167]}, {"key": "not-limited", "type": "clause", "offset": [183, 194]}, {"key": "single-arbitrator", "type": "clause", "offset": [224, 241]}, {"key": "expenses-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [282, 293]}, {"key": "alternative-process", "type": "clause", "offset": [299, 318]}, {"key": "by-the-parties", "type": "clause", "offset": [342, 356]}, {"key": "the-grievance", "type": "clause", "offset": [360, 373]}], "hash": "cc2d288ce51200c8569575979e9ef37e", "id": 8}, {"samples": [{"hash": "2HUf82TaJAE", "uri": "/contracts/2HUf82TaJAE#alternative-methods", "label": "Capitation Rate Certification", "score": 32.0192799588, "published": true}, {"hash": "d2QkA2mfUbS", "uri": "/contracts/d2QkA2mfUbS#alternative-methods", "label": "Capitation Rate Certification", "score": 31.3102986147, "published": true}], "snippet": "Not Applicable\u200c Not applicable. The projected benefit cost trends were developed using utilization per 1000 and unit cost components. I.3.B.iii.(b)(iii) Other Components\u200c The projected benefit cost trends were developed by GSA, implicitly addressing regional differences in utilization and unit cost data.", "size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "not-applicable", "type": "clause", "offset": [0, 14]}, {"key": "projected-benefit-cost-trends", "type": "clause", "offset": [36, 65]}, {"key": "cost-components", "type": "clause", "offset": [117, 132]}, {"key": "unit-cost-data", "type": "definition", "offset": [290, 304]}], "hash": "42b1ad41fe057ecff9d284192b5f200d", "id": 9}, {"samples": [{"hash": "1HpLxiBmane", "uri": "/contracts/1HpLxiBmane#alternative-methods", "label": "Lease Agreement", "score": 17.609727005, "published": true}], "snippet": "(i) You may use other methods to determine a base figure for your overall goal. Any meth- odology you choose must be based on demonstrable evidence of local market conditions and be designed to ulti- mately attain a goal that is rationally related to the relative availability of ACDBEs in your market area.\n(ii) In the case of a car rental goal, where it appears that all or most of the goal is likely to be met through the purchases by car rental companies of vehicles or other goods or services from ACDBEs, one permissible alternative is to structure the goal entirely in terms of purchases of goods and services. In this case, you would calculate your car rental overall goal by dividing the esti- mated dollar value of such purchases from ACDBEs by the total estimated dollar value of all purchases to be made by car rental companies.", "size": 1, "snippet_links": [{"key": "other-methods", "type": "clause", "offset": [16, 29]}, {"key": "to-determine", "type": "definition", "offset": [30, 42]}, {"key": "base-figure", "type": "definition", "offset": [45, 56]}, {"key": "overall-goal", "type": "clause", "offset": [66, 78]}, {"key": "you-choose", "type": "definition", "offset": [98, 108]}, {"key": "based-on", "type": "clause", "offset": [117, 125]}, {"key": "evidence-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [139, 150]}, {"key": "local-market-conditions", "type": "definition", "offset": [151, 174]}, {"key": "related-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [240, 250]}, {"key": "availability-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [264, 279]}, {"key": "market-area", "type": "clause", "offset": [295, 306]}, {"key": "in-the-case", "type": "clause", "offset": [313, 324]}, {"key": "car-rental", "type": "definition", "offset": [330, 340]}, {"key": "is-likely", "type": "definition", "offset": [393, 402]}, {"key": "the-purchases", "type": "clause", "offset": [421, 434]}, {"key": "other-goods-or-services", "type": "clause", "offset": [474, 497]}, {"key": "terms-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [576, 584]}, {"key": "goods-and-services", "type": "clause", "offset": [598, 616]}, {"key": "your-car", "type": "definition", "offset": [652, 660]}, {"key": "dollar-value", "type": "definition", "offset": [709, 721]}, {"key": "the-total", "type": "clause", "offset": [755, 764]}, {"key": "all-purchases", "type": "clause", "offset": [791, 804]}], "hash": "7e60eb53d5abe63204cd26f441fdfbec", "id": 10}], "next_curs": "ClwSVmoVc35sYXdpbnNpZGVyY29udHJhY3RzcjgLEhZDbGF1c2VTbmlwcGV0R3JvdXBfdjU2IhxhbHRlcm5hdGl2ZS1tZXRob2RzIzAwMDAwMDBhDKIBAmVuGAAgAA==", "clause": {"parents": [["grievance-procedure", "Grievance Procedure"], ["vacation", "Vacation"], ["report-in", "Report\u2010In"], ["re-checking-the-analysers", "Re-checking the Analysers"], ["span-drift", "Span Drift"]], "title": "Alternative Methods", "size": 35, "children": [["activation-of-the-ozonator", "Activation of the Ozonator"], ["calculation", "Calculation"], ["calibration", "Calibration"], ["adding-of-oxygen", "Adding of Oxygen"], ["test-set-up", "Test Set-up"]], "id": "alternative-methods", "related": [["alternative-warning", "Alternative Warning", "Alternative Warning"], ["alternative-resolution-methods", "Alternative Resolution Methods", "Alternative Resolution Methods"], ["alternatives", "Alternatives", "Alternatives"], ["construction-methods", "Construction Methods", "Construction Methods"], ["allocation-method", "Allocation Method", "Allocation Method"]], "related_snippets": [], "updated": "2025-07-07T12:37:53+00:00", "also_ask": [], "drafting_tip": "", "explanation": "The \"Alternative Methods\" clause defines the procedures or options available for performing certain actions or fulfilling obligations under an agreement in ways other than the standard or initially specified method. This clause typically outlines acceptable alternative approaches, such as using different technologies, processes, or communication channels, provided they meet agreed-upon standards or achieve the same result. Its core practical function is to introduce flexibility into the contract, allowing parties to adapt to changing circumstances or preferences without breaching the agreement, thereby reducing the risk of disputes over rigid procedural requirements."}, "json": true, "cursor": ""}}