Allocation Methodologies Sample Clauses

Allocation Methodologies. 15 (c) No Double-Counting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 (d) Timing of Adjustments and Payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 ARTICLE III

Allocation Methodologies. Subject to the proviso which follows, the Purchase Price will be further adjusted downward by the amount (if any) equal to 7.5 times the amount reflected in the report concerning the Allocation Methodologies issued by AA in connection with its delivery of the Audited Closing Financial Statements in accordance with the terms of Section 2.10 as being the aggregate net amount (i.e., taking into account both positive and negative items) by which the earnings of the Transferred Business for 1998 are (or are reasonably likely to be) negatively affected because of errors and omissions in such allocations; provided, however, that (i) no adjustment shall be made as a result of the foregoing unless and until the aggregate net amount by which the earnings of the Transferred Business are (or are reasonably likely to be) negatively affected exceeds $150,000, whereupon the Purchase Price shall be adjusted (using the multiple set forth above) for all of such aggregate amount; (ii) in respect of any Purchase Price adjustment pursuant to this paragraph (b) which is based on the first $150,000, the multiple used in determining the adjustment shall be 3.75 instead of 7.5 (with the effect that the adjustment in respect of such $150,000 shall be capped at $562,500); and, (iii) prior to making any Purchase Price adjustment under this paragraph (b), Seller and Shareholder shall have ten (10) business days to remedy or cure any such matter to the Buyer's reasonable satisfaction.

Allocation Methodologies. In this paper, the global mitigation burden (the required deviation from the BAU emissions level, shown in Figure 1) is allocated among participating countries for each commitment period. Table 2 lists the alternative HR-based allocation schemes examined in this study. Run Start Year End Year Evaluation Year Indicator Background 1 1890 10-year dynamic 2100 Temperature Case ME 2 1990 10-year dynamic 2100 Temperature Case ME 3 1945 10-year dynamic 2100 Temperature Case ME 4 1890 2000 2100 Temperature Case ME 5 1890 5-year dynamic 2100 Temperature Case ME 6 1890 2000 2000 Temperature Case ME 7 1890 2000 2010 Temperature Case ME 8 1890 2000 2050 Temperature Case ME 9 1890 2000 - Cumulative Emissions Case ME 10 1890 2000 2100 Temperature Zero 11 1890 2000 2100 Temperature Constant Table 2: Policy-related HR parameters in alternative experimental runs For clarity, we introduce the definition of the allocation year in HR-based allocation schemes: the year in which the GHG abatement (allocated by an HR calculation) takes place. The use of this term ensures we differentiate the allocation year from the start, end and evaluation years. We employ an allocation-based methodology (as defined in Rose et al. (1998)) to apply our HR calculations. A participant will be allocated a share of the global mitigation requirement (in terms of tons GHG) equal to its calculated HR. For example, for a given allocation year, if the USA is calculated to have historically contributed to 20% of warming, it will be assigned 20% of global mitigation burden (in terms of CO2 equivalent emission reductions) in the allocation year. Such a simple methodology is the simplest interpretation of the Brazilian Proposal principles; we keep separate alternative fairness criteria such as ability-to-pay or grandfathering. It is certainly feasible to merge an HR-based burden sharing scheme with other fairness criteria, such as ability- to-pay thresholds (i.e. den Elzen et al., 2005b). However, we choose not to do so, in order to assess the effects of using a burden sharing scheme that solely uses historical responsibility criteria. With regards to participation, we assume all countries, both developed and developing, will be participating in mitigation in our climate regime. The role of developing countries in future climate agreements remains under discussion, however it is highly likely that participation in future regimes will be expanded beyond the Annex-I grouping with some form of obligations. We ...

Allocation Methodologies. Unless the Commission deems otherwise in a DSM/XX Xxxxx proceeding: