ACRES MORE OR LESS. As depicted in Drawing Number 13, shown on the next page. Depiction Exhibit F-4 to Seventh Amended and Restated Master Lease and Access Agreement [Legal Description for Xxxxx Cross Refinery Complex (excluding the Xxxxx Cross Pipeline Pad)] LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR TANK 103: BEGINNING AT A POINT NORTH 89°47’37” EAST 1214.48 FEET ALONG THE SECTION LINE AND NORTH 17.43 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST SALT LAKE BASE AND MERIDIAN AND RUNNING THENCE WEST 127.59 FEET; THENCE NORTH 114.20 FEET; THENCE EAST 127.59 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 114.20 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINS 0.33 ACRES THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION IS NORTH 89°26’13” EAST BETWEEN THE FOUND MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF 500 SOUTH AND 1100 WEST AND THE FOUND MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF 500 SOUTH AND 800 WEST. LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR TANK 121: BEGINNING AT A POINT NORTH 89°47’37” EAST 1245.39 FEET ALONG THE SECTION LINE AND NORTH 530.12 FEET FROM THE XXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XX XXXXXXX 00, XXXXXXXX 0 XXXXX, XXXXX 1 WEST SALT LAKE BASE AND MERIDIAN AND RUNNING THENCE WEST 243.16 FEET; THENCE NORTH 181.87 FEET; THENCE EAST 243.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 181.87 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINS 1.02 ACRES THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION IS NORTH 89°26’13” EAST BETWEEN THE FOUND MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF 500 SOUTH AND 1100 WEST AND THE FOUND MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF 500 SOUTH AND 800 WEST. LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR TANK 126: BEGINNING AT A POINT NORTH 89°47’37” EAST 1160.50 FEET ALONG THE SECTION LINE AND NORTH 364.64 FEET FROM THE XXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXX 00, XXXXXXXX 0 XXXXX, XXXXX 1 WEST SALT LAKE BASE AND MERIDIAN AND RUNNING THENCE WEST 200.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 15°16’07” EAST 148.03 FEET; THENCE EAST 161.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 142.81 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINS 0.59 ACRES THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION IS NORTH 89°26’13” EAST BETWEEN THE FOUND MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF 500 SOUTH AND 1100 WEST AND THE FOUND MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF 500 SOUTH AND 800 WEST. Exhibit F-5 to Seventh Amended and Restated Master Lease and Access Agreement [Legal Description for Xxxxx Cross Pipeline Pad] 12” HEP to UNEV Refined Products Pipeline Origin Trap and Piping, Associated SCADA Control Building, and Satellite Dish A PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, SALT LAKE BASE AND MERIDIAN, XXXXX COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS...
ACRES MORE OR LESS. As depicted in Drawing Number 1, shown on the next page. Depiction Wax Rail Rack Legal Description A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 19 NORTH, RANGE 12 EAST, IBM, TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
ACRES MORE OR LESS. As depicted in Drawing Number 2, shown on the next page. Depiction Black Oil Rail Rack Legal Description A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 19 NORTH, RANGE 12 EAST, IBM, TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
ACRES MORE OR LESS. As depicted in Drawing Number 3, shown on the next page. Depiction
ACRES MORE OR LESS. As depicted in Drawing Number 5, shown on the next page. Depiction Wax Truck Rack Legal Description A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 19 NORTH, RANGE 12 EAST, IBM, TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
ACRES MORE OR LESS. As depicted in Drawing Number 7, shown on the next page. Depiction Extract Rail Rack
ACRES MORE OR LESS. As depicted in Drawing Number 8, shown on the next page. Depiction Bright Stock Rail Rack, Diesel Rail Rack, L70 Rail Rack (1 of 2) Legal Description A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 19 NORTH, RANGE 12 EAST, I.B.M., TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
ACRES MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO THE RIGHTS OF THE PUBLIC AND OF ANY GOVERNMENTAL UNIT IN ANY PART THEREOF TAKEN, USED, OR DEEDED FOR STREET, ROAD, OR HIGHWAY PURPOSES. THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WITH AN ERROR OF CLOSURE NO GREATER THAN 1 IN 15000. THIS SURVEY COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 3, P.A. 132 OF 1970, AS AMENDED, EXCEPT FOR PAPER SIZE. ASSUMED THE LINE BETWEEN THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER AND THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 14 TO BEAR WEST. EXHIBIT B PENDING BAND LITIGATION Taxpayers of Michigan Against Casinos et al. v. State of Michigan. The Michigan Supreme Court has ruled against plaintiff TOMAC's challenges to the validity of the Compact. 471 Mich. 306, 685 N.W.2d221 (2004). TOMAC has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. Also, on remand from the Michigan Supreme Court, in Michigan Court of Appeals Case No. 225017, TOMAC challenges the validity of the Compact under the appropriation and separation of powers provisions of the Michigan Constitution. The Band is not a party to these actions, but may choose to intervene. TOMAC v. Norton et al., U.S.D.C.D.C., Case No. 1:01CV00398-JR. The plaintixx xx xxxt action challenges the decision of the Department of Interior to take the Gaming Site into trust. The Band is not a party to that action, but may choose to intervene. Pokagon Properties, LLC v Leonard A. Kolberg, Jr.,Case No. 02-49-765-CK-B, Circuit Court for txx Xxxxxx xx Xxx Xxxxx. Claim for non-payment of rent from crop lease. Amount of claim: approximately $36,000.00. Defendant has filed a counterclaim seeking damages in the amount of $118,000.00. The parties have entered into a settlement agreement which includes the Band receiving $9,000 and a dismissal of all claims. Pokagon Properties, LLC v Dean Anderson, Case No. 71C010205CC00602, Circuit Court for the Counxx xx Xx. Xxxeph. Claim for non-payment of rent from crop lease. Amount of claxx: xxproximately $52,000.00. Defendant has filed a counterclaim in the approximate amount of $63,000.00.
ACRES MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO ANY AND ALL LEGAL EASEMENTS AND OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY.
ACRES MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO THE RIGHTS OF THE PUBLIC AND OF ANY GOVERNMENTAL UNIT IN ANY PART THEREOF TAKEN, USED, OR DEEDED FOR STREET, ROAD, OR HIGHWAY PURPOSES. THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WITH AN ERROR OF CLOSURE NO GREATER THAN 1 IN 15000. THIS SURVEY COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 3, P.A. 132 OF 1970, AS AMENDED, EXCEPT FOR PAPER SIZE. ASSUMED THE LINE BETWEEN THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER AND THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 14 TO BEAR WEST. EXHIBIT E SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED LAKES DEVELOPMENT NOTE [SEE CLOSING AGENDA: ITEM 4] EXHIBIT F LAKES FACILITY NOTE [SEE CLOSING AGENDA: ITEM 5] EXHIBIT G SECURITY AGREEMENT [SEE CLOSING AGENDA: ITEM 6] EXHIBIT H LAKES WORKING CAPITAL ADVANCE NOTE [SEE CLOSING AGENDA: ITEM 7] EXHIBIT I LAKES MINIMUM PAYMENTS NOTE [SEE CLOSING AGENDA: ITEM 8] EXHIBIT J SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED NON-GAMING LAND ACQUISITION LINE OF CREDIT AGREEMENT [SEE CLOSING AGENDA: ITEM 9] EXHIBIT K SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED TRANSITION LOAN NOTE [SEE CLOSING AGENDA: ITEM 10] EXHIBIT L BAND LITIGATION Taxpayers of Michigan Against Casinos et al. v. State of Michigan. The Michigan Supreme Court has ruled against plaintiff TOMAC's challenges to the validity of the Compact. 471 Mich. 306, 685 N.W.2d221 (2004). TOMAC has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. Also, on remand from the Michigan Supreme Court, in Michigan Court of Appeals Case No. 225017, TOMAC challenges the validity of the Compact under the appropriation and separation of powers provisions of the Michigan Constitution. The Band is not a party to these actions, but may choose to intervene. TOMAC v. Norton et al., U.S.D.C.D.C., Case No. 1:01CV00398-JR. The plaintixx xx xxxt action challenges the decision of the Department of Interior to take the Gaming Site into trust. The Band is not a party to that action, but may choose to intervene. Pokagon Properties, LLC v Leonard A. Kolberg, Jr.,Case No. 02-49-765-CK-B, Circuit Court for txx Xxxxxx xx Xxx Xxxxx. Claim for non-payment of rent from crop lease. Amount of claim: approximately $36,000.00. Defendant has filed a counterclaim seeking damages in the amount of $118,000.00. The parties have entered into a settlement agreement which includes the Band receiving $9,000 and a dismissal of all claims. Pokagon Properties, LLC v Dean Anderson, Case No. 71C010205CC00602, Circuit Court for the Counxx xx Xx. Xxxeph. Claim for non-payment of rent from crop lease. Amount of claxx: xxproximately $52,000.00. Defendant has filed a cou...
