A CASE STUDY Sample Clauses

A CASE STUDY. The Mosaic Church Campus is a relatively new concept. After a great deal of research, I have only been able to identify one credible example, Springhouse Ministry in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Xxx Xxxxxx is the Building Use Coordinator of SpringHouse Ministry Center and a member of the Board. She is the only one of the original formation committee still in leadership. In an interview she walked me through the process of discovery to an inspirational thriving ministry of hope. In 2005, Salem English Lutheran Church (Salem) and Lyndale Congregational United Church of Xxxxxx (Lyndale) were both unsuccessfully struggling to maintain their buildings while also trying to finance ministries. Located just four blocks apart they decided to move together into one building. Salem closed their facility in 2006 and moved in with Lyndale. Unfortunately, Xxxxxxx’s building was dilapidated and insufficient to meet their needs, so it was sold. Together, they moved into a shared building with Intermedia Arts. Plans were drawn up to renovate the Salem location to be affordable housing and a Salem/Lyndale Ministry Center. A closing/groundbreaking ceremony was held in November of that year. However, the building market tanked, and everything was put on hold. Finally, in 2010, the project was restarted and an architectural firm was hired. Xxxxxxx and Xxxxx quickly realized that financially they needed a third party involved to complete the project. During this same time period, First Christian Church (First) was experiencing similar challenges with their building and ministries and had sold their building. They were renting a facility in the area while they discussed the long-term plan for their church's viability and sustainability. By November of 2010, the three churches were in conversation. Xxx Xxxxxx, SpringHouse Building Coordinator, said: We needed to get out from under these really large buildings that were eating all of our money. We were supporting the church building. We were not supporting the church. I remember one of our Trustees as we were moving forward with the process of coming together in this building, he said he was looking forward to working on his faith instead of working to keep a roof over our heads…We can support each other and hopefully survive where we knew we weren’t going to survive the way we were. 24 In January 2011 before the renovations were completed, all three congregations agreed to enter into a covenant partnership to pay for and complete the ...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
A CASE STUDY. Learning English as foreign language by the deaf and severely hard-of-hearing as implemented by the Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training (Utdanningsdirektoratet): The language learning focuses on knowledge about the language, language usage and insight into one's own language learning. Being able to assess one's own language usage, define one's own needs and select strategies and ways of working are the requirements for attaining this. This main subject area focuses on seeing what is involved in learning a new language and seeing relationships between English, one's native language and other languages.

Related to A CASE STUDY

  • Feasibility Study 4.3.1 The Feasibility Study shall identify any potential adverse system impacts that would result from the interconnection of the Generating Facility.

  • Study An application for leave of absence for professional study must be supported by a written statement indicating what study or research is to be undertaken, or, if applicable, what subjects are to be studied and at what institutions.

  • Re-Study If Re-Study of the Interconnection Facilities Study is required due to a higher queued project dropping out of the queue or a modification of a higher queued project pursuant to Section 4.4, Transmission Provider shall so notify Interconnection Customer in writing. Such Re-Study shall take no longer than sixty (60) Calendar Days from the date of notice. Any cost of Re-Study shall be borne by the Interconnection Customer being re-studied.

  • The Study 2.1The parties must comply with, and conduct the Study in accordance with, the Protocol and any conditions of the Reviewing HREC. In addition the parties must comply with the following, as applicable:

  • Clinical Trials The studies, tests and preclinical and clinical trials conducted by or on behalf of, or sponsored by, the Company, or in which the Company has participated, that are described in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package or the Prospectus, or the results of which are referred to in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package or the Prospectus, were and, if still pending, are being conducted in all material respects in accordance with protocols, procedures and controls pursuant to, where applicable, accepted professional and scientific standards for products or product candidates comparable to those being developed by the Company and all applicable statutes, rules and regulations of the FDA, the EMEA, Health Canada and other comparable drug and medical device (including diagnostic product) regulatory agencies outside of the United States to which they are subject; the descriptions of the results of such studies, tests and trials contained in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package or the Prospectus do not contain any misstatement of a material fact or omit a material fact necessary to make such statements not misleading; the Company has no knowledge of any studies, tests or trials not described in the Disclosure Package and the Prospectus the results of which reasonably call into question in any material respect the results of the studies, tests and trials described in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package or Prospectus; and the Company has not received any notices or other correspondence from the FDA, EMEA, Health Canada or any other foreign, state or local governmental body exercising comparable authority or any Institutional Review Board or comparable authority requiring or threatening the termination, suspension or material modification of any studies, tests or preclinical or clinical trials conducted by or on behalf of, or sponsored by, the Company or in which the Company has participated, and, to the Company’s knowledge, there are no reasonable grounds for the same. Except as disclosed in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package and the Prospectus, there has not been any violation of law or regulation by the Company in its respective product development efforts, submissions or reports to any regulatory authority that could reasonably be expected to require investigation, corrective action or enforcement action.

  • Development Phase contractual phase initiated with the approval of ANP for the Development Plan and which is extended during the Production Phase while investments in xxxxx, equipment, and facilities for the Production of Oil and Gas according to the Best Practices of the Oil Industry are required.

  • Study Population ‌ Infants who underwent creation of an enterostomy receiving postoperative care and awaiting enterostomy closure: to be assessed for eligibility: n = 201 to be assigned to the study: n = 106 to be analysed: n = 106 Duration of intervention per patient of the intervention group: 6 weeks between enterostomy creation and enterostomy closure Follow-up per patient: 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post enterostomy closure, following enterostomy closure (12-month follow-up only applicable for patients that are recruited early enough to complete this follow-up within the 48 month of overall study duration).

  • Trials The Ship shall run the following test and trials:

  • Phase 2 Phase 2 is expected to consist of Member Nodes and a select number of Nodes operated by non-Members. The non-Member Nodes will be required to comply with Node hosting terms as set forth by the Council, which may be amended from time to time (the “General Node Terms”).

  • Clinical Studies The animal and other preclinical studies and clinical trials conducted by the Company or on behalf of the Company were, and, if still pending are, to the Company’s knowledge, being conducted in all material respects in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with experimental protocols, procedures and controls generally used by qualified experts in the preclinical study and clinical trials of new drugs and biologics as applied to comparable products to those being developed by the Company; the descriptions of the results of such preclinical studies and clinical trials contained in the Registration Statement and the Prospectus are accurate and complete in all material respects, and, except as set forth in the Registration Statement and the Prospectus, the Company has no knowledge of any other clinical trials or preclinical studies, the results of which reasonably call into question the clinical trial or preclinical study results described or referred to in the Registration Statement and the Prospectus when viewed in the context in which such results are described; and the Company has not received any written notices or correspondence from the FDA, the EMA, or any other domestic or foreign governmental agency requiring the termination, suspension or modification of any preclinical studies or clinical trials conducted by or on behalf of the Company that are described in the Registration Statement and the Prospectus or the results of which are referred to in the Registration Statement and the Prospectus.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.