Commission Action. The Commission establishes Docket No. CP2013–68 for consideration of matters raised by the Notice. Interested persons may submit comments on whether the Postal Service’s filings are consistent with 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or 3642, 39 CFR part 3015, and subpart B of 39 CFR part 3020. Comments are due no later than June 25, 2013. The public portions of the Postal Service’s filing can be accessed via the Commission’s Web site, xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx. Information concerning access to non- public material is located in 39 CFR part 3007. The Commission appoints Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx to serve as Public Representative in the above captioned proceeding. It is ordered:
Commission Action. Motion made by Xx. Xxxxx, seconded by Xx. Xxxxxx and unanimously approved with changes discussed. A second motion was made by Xx. Xxxxxx to approve the CCRC Proposal unanimously.
Commission Action. Upon receiving a gas utility report and petition for
Commission Action. Each time the connection charge is reviewed, the Racine Waterworks Commission may decide to freeze the charge at its then-current amount until the next review, continue to increase the charge annually by the percentage change in the annual average Construction Cost Index, or increase the charge by an amount necessary to adequately recover the Future Growth Costs within the specified 20- year period. The amount of any adjusted connection charge shall be computed by a methodology substantially similar to the methodology used in the Connection Fee Report, using a rolling 10-year capital improvement plan and a recovery period that extends 10 years beyond the 10-year capital improvement plan, and shall conform to the principles of the impact fee standards set out in Subsection 66.0617(6) of the Wisconsin Statutes (2001-02), applied to this situation by analogy, as though the Racine Utility were a municipality and the Village and the other Municipal Retail Customers of the Racine Utility were developers within such municipality. If the review of the charge indicates that the Racine Utility is likely to collect substantially more than the amount of its Future Growth Costs, the Racine Waterworks Commission shall freeze the amount of the charge until the next review.
Commission Action. A. Granting the True-Up Petition is consistent with applicable law First, concerning the argument by XXX that the Commission should regard this petition under Minn. Stat. § 216B.16, subd. 1a, the Commission concludes that the statute does not apply to these circumstances. Minn. Stat. § 216B.16, subd. 1a, provides a method for the Commission to consider settlements of all or part of a rate case when “the applicant and all intervening parties agree.” This is not such a circumstance. Nor is the petition an extension of a prior settlement, as XLI suggests. Accordingly, the Commission does not adopt the standard offered by XLI for reviewing Xcel’s petition. The petition is not offered as a settlement to an existing rate filing, but as an alternative to taking up a rate proceeding at this time. What Xcel has presented the Commission is a proposal for maintaining the status quo upon the conclusion of a Commission-approved multiyear rate plan established under Minn. Stat. § 216B.16, subd. 19.
Commission Action. Having reviewed Xcel’s filing, the Commission will accept Xcel’s July 15 compliance filing as consistent with the Commission’s January 2019 Order. The Commission agrees with the Department and the OAG that, to best protect ratepayers, a more conservative estimate of future DOE reimbursements should be built into the decommissioning accrual calculations. Accordingly, the Commission will approve a decommissioning accrual of $27,418,421 to go into effect on January 1, 2021.7 The Commission will also approve the annual end-of-life nuclear fuel accrual amount of $2,087,026, which will also take effect on January 1, 2021. The January 1, 2021 start date will allow implementation of the adjustments to coincide with Xcel’s next anticipated rate case filing, and will avoid the need to address the question of
Commission Action. Each provision of this Agreement is in consideration and support of all the other provisions, and expressly conditioned upon acceptance by the Commission without change. In the event that the Commission fails to adopt this Agreement according to its terms by November 25, 1998, this Agreement shall be deemed withdrawn and the parties shall be free to pursue their respective positions in these proceedings without prejudice.
Commission Action. Seller shall provide to Buyer, promptly upon receipt thereof by Seller, a copy of (i) any notice from the FCC or any other governmental authority of the revocation, suspension, or limitation of the rights under, or of any proceeding for the revocation, suspension, or limitation of the rights under (or that such authority may in the future, as the result of failure to comply with laws or regulations or for any other reason, revoke, suspend or limit the rights under) any License, or any other license or permit held by Seller respecting the Station, and (ii) copies of all protests, complaints, challenges or other documents filed with the FCC by third parties concerning the Station and, promptly upon the filing or making thereof, copies of Seller's responses to such filings. Seller shall notify Buyer in writing immediately upon
Commission Action. The Commission establishes Docket No. CP2014–28 for consideration of matters raised by the Postal Service’s Notice. Interested persons may submit comments on whether the Agreement is consistent with the requirements of 39 CFR 3015.5 and the policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632 and 3633. Comments are due no later than February 26, 2014. The public portions of this filing can be accessed via the Commission’s Web site, http:// xxx.xxx.xxx. Information on how to obtain access to material filed under seal appears in 39 CFR 3007.40. The Commission appoints Xxxxxx X. Xxxx to serve as Public Representative in the captioned proceeding.
Commission Action. If despite the foregoing process, there remains a dispute regarding the budget, PJM shall, not later than November 1, file the Market Monitor's proposed budget with the Commission for resolution of the dispute. PJM shall accompany such filing with an explanation of the nature of the dispute and any position of the PJM Board on such dispute. Any interested person may also file comments on such dispute. The fact that PJM is submitting the dispute for Commission review shall not be deemed to provide the views of the PJM Board any special weight, nor subject them to any special burden of proof. If the Commission has not taken action by December 31, the Market Monitor's proposed budget, filed by PJM, shall take effect, subject to any subsequent Commission order.
