Xxxxxx v. City of Durham,183 F.3d 323, 329 n.3 (4th Cir. 1999).
Xxxxxx v. Google, Case No. 2019-CH-00990) ; (iii) proof that he/she is in the Settlement Class; (iv) all grounds for the objection, with factual and legal support for the stated objection, including any supporting materials; and (v) the objector’s signature. If represented by counsel, the objecting Settlement Class Member must also provide the name and telephone number of his/her counsel, in addition to the information set forth in (i) through (v) above. If the objecting Settlement Class Member intends to appear at the Final Approval Hearing, either with or without counsel, he/she/they must so state in the written objection, and must also identify any witnesses he/she/they may call to testify at the Final Approval Hearing and all exhibits he/she/they intends to introduce into evidence at the Final Approval Hearing, which must also be attached to, or included with, the written objection.
Xxxxxx v. Houma Psychiatric Hospital dba Bayou Oaks Hospital, 32nd Judicial Court for the Parish of Terrebonne, State of Louisiana, Civil No. 119600. Defendant served with notice of suit on July 1, 1997 for negligence involving wrist fracture of plaintiff while patient
Xxxxxx v. Alterra Mountain Co. and Ikon Pass Inc., Case No. 1:20-cv-01057-RM-SKC (D. Colo.); (2) Xxxxxx v. Alterra Mountain Co. and Ikon Pass, Inc., Case No. 1:20-cv-01158- RM-SKC (D. Colo.); (3) Farmer v. Alterra Mountain Co. U.S. Inc. and Ikon Pass Inc., Case No. 1:20-cv-01175-RM- SKC (D. Colo.); (4)
Xxxxxx v. Canada (AG), 2016 ONSC 3865; Xxxxxx x. Xxxxxx, Xxxxxx & Xxxxxx Ltd., [2009] O.J. No. 3463 at paras. 39-40 (S.C.J.), aff’d 2010 ONCA 613, leave to appeal ref’d [2010] SCCA 438; Xxxxxx v. Canada Revenue Agency, 2016 ABQB 260 at para. 32; Merchant Law Group v. Canada Revenue Agency, 2010 FCA 184 at para. 34. 392106701 Ontario Inc. (c.o.b. Novajet) v. 2288450 Ontario Ltd., 2016 ONSC 2673 at para. 42; Aristocrat Restaurants Ltd. v. Ontario, [2004] O.J. No. 5164 (S.C.J.); Xxxxxx v. Rexcraft Storage & Warehouse Inc., [1998] O.J. No. 3240 at para. 10 (C.A.). [133] Section 45(1) of the Competition Act currently reads: Conspiracies, agreements or arrangements between competitors
Xxxxxx v. Ralee Engineering Co., 960 P.2d 1046 (Cal.
Xxxxxx v. Adobe, Inc. Settlement Administrator ATTN: EXCLUSION REQUEST 20 [address] [city], [state] [zip code]
Xxxxxx v. The Islamic Republic of Iran, decided in 1987 by the Iran-US Claims Tribunal (IUSCT), which in turn relied on an earlier draft of the ILC Articles to support its conclusion.16 Furthermore, the final ILC Commentary does not cite any instances of state practice or established law, other than a passing reference to the idea of levée en masse in the law of armed conflict.17 Considering this lack of evidence, the question arises whether the rule embodied in Article 9 is in fact a result of the progressive development of international law, rather than its codification. Granted, even if the Article could not have been regarded as a rule of customary interna- tional law at the time of the ARSIWA’s finalization in 2001, it could have since become a customary rule, through widespread adherence.18 However, there are no indications of Article 9 having been applied in subsequent state practice or international jurisprudence, either.19
Xxxxxx v. National Credit Adjusters), a statement that he or she wishes to be excluded from the Settlement Class and the telephone number on which he or she received a call by or on behalf of NCA during the Class Period. A request to be excluded that does not include all of the foregoing information, that is sent to an address other than that designated in the Notice, or that is not postmarked within the time specified, shall be invalid, and the Persons serving such a request shall be deemed to remain members of the Settlement Class and shall be bound by this Settlement Agreement, if approved. Any member of the Settlement Class who elects to be excluded shall not: (1) be bound by any orders or the Final Judgment; (2) be entitled to relief under this Settlement Agreement; (3) gain any rights by virtue of this Settlement Agreement; nor (4) be entitled to object to any aspect of this Settlement Agreement. “Mass” or “class” requests for exclusion shall not be allowed.
Xxxxxx v. General Motors, Case No. 002590 (Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania) 27 (c) Brown v. General Motors, Case No. 03-539 GPM (S.D. Ill.)
