Mini-Competition Contract Award Criteria Sample Clauses

Mini-Competition Contract Award Criteria. 2.2.1 The Service Provider that achieves the highest ranking score by reference to the criteria below will be awarded the Mini-Competition Contract , subject to clause 2.2.11 below. Contract Award Criteria for Mini- Competitions Weighting Maximum Marks Available Most Economically Advantageous Tender: Price 100% 1,000
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Mini-Competition Contract Award Criteria. 4.2.1 The Mini-Competition Contract will be awarded to the most economically advantageous tender(s), identified following application of the contract award criteria and weightings detailed in the Table below. Mini-Competition Award Criteria (MEAT) – Lot 1 (Supply only) Weighting 1 Quality (100 marks) (20%) 1a Technical Support (Description of proposed full time staff and facilities available to provide technical advice and support to Contracting Authorities) 10% (50 marks) 1b After Sales Support (Details of Customer Service Charter/Protocol proposed to be used on the contract, including -: Testing and Quality Assurance Protocol Complaints Procedure) 10% (50 marks) 2 Total Cost (400 marks) (80%) Total Cost will be assessed based on the sum of the pricing (ex. VAT) submitted for the following -: 2a The Supply of [XX] Tonnes of [Emulsion products], expressed as Total Cost for the required quantities of all products specified 80% (400 marks) 2b The Delivery to Location(s) specified by the Contracting Authority, expressed as the Total Cost for delivery of the specified quantities to these locations Total 100%
Sample 1
Mini-Competition Contract Award Criteria. 4.2.1 The Mini-Competition Contract will be awarded to the most economically advantageous tender(s), identified following application of the contract award criteria and weightings detailed in the Table below. Mini-Competition Award Criteria (MEAT) – Lot 2 (Supply and Spray) Weighting 1 Quality (100 marks) (20%) 1a Technical Support (Description of proposed full time staff and facilities available to provide technical advice and support to Contracting Authorities) 10% (50 marks) 1b After Sales Support (Details of Customer Service Charter/Protocol proposed to be used on the contract, including -: Testing and Quality Assurance Protocol Complaints Procedure) 10% (50 marks)
Sample 1
Mini-Competition Contract Award Criteria. 2.2.1 The Supplier that achieves the highest ranking score by reference to the criteria in the Table below will be awarded the Mini-Competition Contract. Mini-Competition Award Criteria Weighting Maximum Marks Available Most Economically Advantageous Tender: Price (1,000 Marks) (100%) Prices will be assessed based on the sum of the prices (ex. VAT) submitted for the required road making material products as follows: 1a The supply only of [XX] units of road making materials expressed as total cost for the required quantities of all products specified 100% 1,000 1b If applicable - the delivery to location(s) specified by the Contracting Authority in the Mini Competition Request for Tender, expressed as the tendered cost for delivery of the specified quantities to these locations which may be specified in the Mini- Competition Request for Tender. 1c If applicable, - additional requirements specified by the Contracting Authority in the Mini-Competition Request for Tender which may give rise to charges associated with deliveries; loading; part loads; standing time; availability of materials; disposal of excess material and/or distances from quarries/batching plants etc. Total 100% 1,000
Sample 1
Mini-Competition Contract Award Criteria 
Sample 1Sample 2

Related to Mini-Competition Contract Award Criteria

  • Further Competition Award Criteria 1. Where a Contracting Body may require Suppliers to develop proposals or a solution in respect of its Statement of Requirements or need to amend or refine the terms of the Call-Off Contract to reflect its Statement of Requirements to the extent permitted by and in accordance with applicable laws (including procurement laws and all necessary guidance), the following criteria shall be applied to the Services set out in the Framework Service Providers' compliant tenders submitted through the Further Competition Procedure:

  • Award Criteria 40.1 The Procuring Entity shall award the Contract to the successful tenderer whose tender has been determined to be the Lowest Evaluated Tender in accordance with procedures in Section 3: Evaluation and Qualification Criteria.

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

  • Employee Performance Review When a formal review of an employee’s performance is made, the employee concerned shall be given an opportunity to discuss, sign and make written comments on the review form in question and the employee is to receive a signed copy to indicate that its contents have been read. An employee shall be entitled to a minimum of two (2) work days to review the performance review prior to providing any response to the Employer, verbally or in writing, with respect to the evaluation.

  • Performance Pay In accordance with Section 8 of the General Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2020-2021, contingent upon the availability of funds and at the Agency Head’s discretion, each agency is authorized to grant merit pay increases based on the employee’s exemplary performance, as evidenced by a performance evaluation conducted pursuant to Rule 60L-35, Florida Administrative Code.

  • System for Award Management (XXX) Requirement Alongside a signed copy of this Agreement, Grantee will provide Florida Housing with a XXX.xxx proof of registration and Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) number. Grantee will continue to maintain an active XXX registration with current information at all times during which it has an active award under this Agreement.

  • Performance Orders A Performance Order:

  • Performance Schedule The Parties will perform their respective responsibilities in accordance with the Performance Schedule. By executing this Agreement, Customer authorizes Motorola to proceed with contract performance.

  • Performance Levels (a) The Performance Levels which apply to the performance by the respective Parties of their obligations under this Agreement are set out in Part 1 of Schedule 5. A failure by either Party to achieve the relevant Performance Level will not constitute a breach of this Agreement and the only consequences of such failure as between the Parties shall be the consequences set out in this Clause 5.6.

  • System for Award Management (XXX) XXX.gov)

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.