Xxxxxx and Xx. Xxx Xxxx are executive directors, and the independent non-executive directors are Xx. Xxx Xxxxxxxx, Xx. Xx Xxxxx Xxxx, Mr. Xx Xxxxx, Mr. Xx Xxxxxxx, Xx. Xxx Xxxxx and Xx. Xx Xxxxxxx.
Xxxxxx and Xx. Xxxxxxxxx.
Xxxxxx and Xx. Xx Xxxxxxx as executive directors, Xx. Xxx Xxxxxxxx as non-executive director, Xx.
Xxxxxx and Xx. Xxx Xxxxxxx; the
Xxxxxx and Xx. XXX Jiqing shall have been added to the Board, such that the members of the Board shall consist of Messrs. GAO Jifan, LIU Canfang, SHI Jianwei, YIP Xxx Xxxxx, XX Xxxxxxx, XXX Xxxxxx, Xxxxx XXX, Xx. Xxxx X. HANSEN, and XXX Xxxxxx.
Xxxxxx and Xx. Xxxxxx shall be admitted as a Nonvoting Member of the Company upon receipt by the Company of the $130,000 referred to above.
Xxxxxx and Xx. Xxx Xxx who are the non-executive Directors, Mr. Xx Xxxxxxx, Xx. Xx Xxxxxxx and Xx. Xx Xxx Xxxxx who are the independent non-executive Directors.
Xxxxxx and Xx. Xxxxxxx were cross-examined at length. Xx. Xxxxxx was not cross-examined. For the court to find facts in favour of the defendant I must therefore satisfy myself that, when juxtaposed with xxxxxx’x unchallenged testimony and the admitted documents, the factual evidence of Messrs. Xxxxxx and Xxxxxxx are so unreliable or discredited by cross-examination as to render the plaintiff’s case unbelievable. The standard of proof would naturally be the civil one of a preponderance of probabilities. (My emphasis). [10] It is not correct to say that the learned trial Judge shifted the legal burden of proof on the defendant. Before analysing the factual issues, the learned trial Judge outlined the approach he would take. What did the learned trial Judge have before him by way of evidence? He had the evidence-in-chief and cross-examination of Xxxxxx and Xxxxxxx and the evidence-in-chief of Xxxxxx and documentary evidence. He had no viva voce evidence from the other side (it may have put in documentary evidence). He reasoned quite rightly, in my judgment, that the appellant having called no witness of fact, if therefore he had to find facts in favour of the appellant, he must satisfy himself that when he examined the documentary evidence and the evidence given by the Xxxxxx and Xxxxxxx including the uncontroverted testimony of Xxxxxx, the evidence of Messrs. Xxxxxx and Xxxxxxx must be so unreliable or discredited by cross-examination so as to render the respondent’s case unreliable. [11] The evidential burden was on the respondent that is the burden of proof in the sense of adducing evidence to establish his case. If the other side leads evidence, that evidence may weaken or destroy the plaintiff’s case [respondent’s]. In the instant case there was no evidence coming from the appellant [defendant]. Evidence given by Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx and the uncontroverted testimony of Xxxxxx on behalf of the respondent, it follows therefore only the cross-examination and documentary evidence were capable of discrediting Xxxxxx and the documentary evidence of discrediting the uncontroverted testimony of Xxxxxx. If the evidence led on behalf of the respondent was discredited or unreliable then he will find in favour of the appellant. This is in effect what the learned trial Judge was saying and in my judgment that must be correct because he had nothing else to go on. [12] As I said above in paragraph 3 of this judgment the learned trial Judge outlined the preliminary issues as referred there...
Xxxxxx and Xx. Xxx work with a group of independent mental health professionals under the name Feeling Good Institute (FGI). This group is an association of independently practicing professionals who share certain expenses and administrative functions. While the members share a name and space, Xx. Xxxxxx is completely independent in providing clinical services and fully responsible for services provided. Many clients at FGI work with multiple clinicians. By signing this document, you are giving Xx. Xxxxxx permission to consult with those clinicians at FGI who may be involved in your treatment. You should be aware that if you choose to use our online booking system (Xxxxxx.xxx) other clinicians at FGI may have access to your name and appointment times. These clinicians are bound by confidentiality under professional ethics codes. Professional records (with details of your case) are separately maintained and no member of FGI can have access to them without your written permission.
Xxxxxx and Xx. Xxx maintain separate phone lines that are answered by confidential voicemail boxes. We will make every effort to return your call within two business days, with the exception of weekends and holidays. In the case of an emergency, please call the Santa Xxxxx County Crisis Line (000-000-0000), dial 911, or go to your local emergency room. If you require regular contact outside of scheduled sessions or crisis mental health services, we can provide referrals to clinicians who can provide this service. Email is a convenient method for scheduling purposes and arranging treatment, however the confidentiality of email cannot be guaranteed. Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx, PhD: 000-000-0000 or xxxxxxxxx.xxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx Xxxxxxx Xxx, MFT Intern: 000-000-0000 or xxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx Your signature below indicates that you have read the information in this document and agree to abide by its terms during our professional relationship. Printed Name: Signature: Date: If different from above: Party Responsible for Payment (Name):
