Staff Evaluations Sample Clauses

Staff Evaluations. For staff employees, evaluation criteria and procedures will be established by the Employer in consultation with employees in the appropriate area and the Joint Professional Development Committee. Evaluation procedures and criteria will
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Staff Evaluations. The Association will be involved in any changes in teacher evaluation instruments or processes.
Staff Evaluations. The revised staff evaluation process for the 2020-2021 SY by October 15, 2020, is attached hereto as Appendix K, and hereby incorporated into this Memorandum Agreement.
Staff Evaluations. The parties agree that the Rhode Island Department of Education model will be the sole tool for evaluating teachers. Unless mutually agreed otherwise, the administrator whose supervisory assignment, experience, and certification best align will evaluate each teacher. Balancing the evaluation load may also be a factor in assignment when multiple administrators align. From time to time and with teacher agreement, multiple evaluators may share an evaluation in order to align practice. The District Evaluation Committee will review any questions or disagreements regarding evaluations, including assignments.
Staff Evaluations. A. Certified Staff The District shall comply with the Performance Evaluation Reform Act (PERA) of the Illinois School Code. All tenured teachers shall be evaluated at least once every three years and all non-tenured teachers shall be evaluated at least once every year, using the four rating levels outlined in PERA, as outlined in Appendix E. Teachers assigned to teach classes for which they are not certified shall not be evaluated for content knowledge in those classes. Tenured teachers who receive a “needs improvement” or “unsatisfactory” evaluation rating shall be placed on a professional development plan or remediation plan, as applicable, in accordance with the School Code. Nothing in this paragraph shall prevent a teacher on a professional development plan or remediation plan from being subject to a reduction in force. Substantive evaluation content and ratings are not subject to the grievance procedure.
Staff Evaluations. Evaluating your staff is important to ensure consistent and quality performance and most importantly, customer service. You can establish 6-month formal evaluation periods to recap their performance. We have also found that informal evaluations conducted when you see a performance or compliance problem, is highly effective in maintaining a company standard. It is a lot more useful when you point out a problem immediately rather than wait when the staff member may not recall the issue. Please refer to Section 4.2.5 and 4.2.6 for sample Manager and Massage Therapist Evaluation Reports.
Staff Evaluations. 5.1 Evaluation Method A committee consisting of 2 classroom teachers and 2 administrators and/or Board members shall develop the evaluation instrument. This committee shall make recommendations to the AEA and the Board. The final selection of the instrument shall be made by the Board and shall be included as Appendix C of the Agreement. Evaluation of teacher performance shall be done by a certified administrator and must be based on his/her own observation(s).
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Staff Evaluations. The parties agree that the Rhode Island Department of Education model will be the sole tool for evaluating teachers. Unless mutually agreed otherwise, the administrator whose supervisory assignment, experience, and certification best align will evaluate each teacher. Balancing the evaluation load may also be a factor in assignment when multiple administrators align. From time to time and with teacher agreement, multiple evaluators may share an evaluation in order to align practice. The District Evaluation Committee will review any questions or disagreements regarding evaluations, including assignments. The parties recognize the need to allow for an appeal process for any evaluation. The appeal process must be completed by June 1. To that end the parties agreed to mutually create a valid appeal process.

Related to Staff Evaluations

  • TEACHER EVALUATIONS A. Each teacher shall have the right, upon request, to review the contents of his/her personal file folder.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. No response TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Yes - No Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • EMPLOYEE EVALUATIONS 3. Any matter for which there is recourse under State or Federal statutes.

  • TEACHER EVALUATION A. All monitoring or observation of the work performance of a teacher shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the teacher.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.