Selection file Sample Clauses

Selection file technical aptitude
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Selection file. Technical aptitude Technical aptitude: See Art. 68 of the Royal Decree of 18 April 2017 The tenderer must show the following references of deliveries made in the course of the past three years. List the references of supplies that have been delivered over the past three years. See Annex 6.7.1 & 6.7.2 or [supporting documents to be attached] The tenderer includes in his tender a list with the main services that have been delivered over the past three years including the amount and date as well as the public or private recipients. The references are backed by certificates drawn up or approved by the competent authority or, where the consignee was a private purchaser by certification of the private purchaser, or by default, by a simple statement of the supplier. Indication of the proportion of the contract which the supplier See Annex 6.2.2 or intends possibly to subcontract. [supporting documents to be attached]
Selection file. In view of the qualitative selection of the tenderers, the information or documents mentioned below must be attached to the tender. Exclusions - see Art. 67 - 70 of the Law of 17 June 2016 Mandatory grounds for exclusion: Art. 67. § 1. Save where the candidate or tenderer demonstrates, in accordance with Article 70, that he has taken sufficient measures to demonstrate his reliability, the contracting authority excludes, at any stage whatsoever in the award procedure, a candidate or tenderer from taking part in the award procedure when it has established or has been informed in any other way that the candidate or tenderer has been convicted by an indefeasible legal decision of one of the following offences: 1° involvement in a criminal organisation; 2° corruption; 3° fraud; 4° terrorist offence, offence related to terrorist activities or incitement to commit such offence, collusion or attempt to commit such an offence; 5° money laundering or financing of terrorism; 6° child labour or any other forms of human trafficking. 7° employment of foreign citizens under illegal status. The King may state the offences listed in clause 1 in more detail. By derogation to clause 1, the contracting authority excludes the candidate or tenderer who has employed foreign citizens under illegal status, even where there is no indefeasible conviction, once this offence has been noted by an administrative or legal decision, including by written notification in execution of Article 49/2 of the Social Criminal Code. This derogation does not preclude the possibility, as set out in Article 70, of the candidate or tenderer invoking corrective measures, where appropriate. By derogation to clause 1, the contracting authority may in exceptional situations and for imperative reasons in the general interest provide for a derogation from the mandatory exclusions The obligation to exclude the candidate or tenderer also applies when the person found guilty is a member of the administrative, management or monitoring body of the said candidate or tenderer or holds a power of representation, decision or control within it. Where this involves an offence stated in clause 3 and where there is no aforementioned final judgement, the same obligation of exclusion is applicable, when the person in question is designated in an administrative or legal decision as being a person where an offence has been noted in terms of employment of foreign citizens with illegal status, and who is a member of the admi...
Selection file. 289 A tenderer may, where appropriate and for a particular contract, rely on the capacities of other entities, regardless of the legal nature of the links which he has with these entities. In that case, the following rules apply:
Selection file. To be selected the tendered must attach the following documents to his offer

Related to Selection file

  • Selection Process The Mortgage Loans were selected from among the outstanding one- to four-family mortgage loans in the Seller's portfolio at the related Closing Date as to which the representations and warranties set forth in Subsection 9.02 could be made and such selection was not made in a manner so as to affect adversely the interests of the Purchaser;

  • Review and Selection Process The Project Narratives of SAMHSA applications are peer-reviewed according to the evaluation criteria listed above. Decisions to fund a grant are based on the strengths and weaknesses of the application as identified by peer reviewers. The results of the peer review are advisory in nature. The program office and approving official make the final determination for funding based on the following: • Individual awards over $250,000 are approved by the Center for Mental Health Services National Advisory Council; • Availability of funds; • Equitable distribution of awards in terms of geography (including urban, rural, and remote settings) and balance among populations of focus and program size; • Submission of any required documentation that must be submitted prior to making an award; and • SAMHSA is required to review and consider any information about your organization that is in the Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). In accordance with 45 CFR 75.212, SAMHSA reserves the right not to make an award to an entity if that entity does not meet the minimum qualification standards as described in section 75.205(a)(2). If SAMHSA chooses not to award a fundable application in accordance with 45 CFR 75.205(a)(2), SAMHSA must report that determination to the designated integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (XXX) [currently, FAPIIS]. You may review and comment on any information about your organization that a federal awarding agency previously entered. XXXXXX will consider your comments, in addition to other information in FAPIIS in making a judgment about your organization’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing the review of risk posed as described in 45 CFR 75.205 HHS Awarding Agency Review of Risk by Applicants.

  • Selection Procedures In selecting the Loan Assets to be Pledged pursuant to this Agreement, no selection procedures were employed which are intended to be adverse to the interests of the Lenders.

  • Selection Procedure 10.2.4.1 Internal applicants shall be defined as all applicants with seniority in accordance with Article 12.5.

  • Contractor Selection In this section, please describe the selection process, including other sources considered and the rationale for selecting the contractor. Please answer all questions:

  • TIMELINESS OF BILLING SUBMISSION The parties agree that timeliness of billing is of the essence to this Contract and recognize that the City is on a fiscal year. All xxxxxxxx for dates of service prior to July 1 must be submitted to the City no later that the first Friday in August of the same year.

  • Provider Selection To the extent applicable to Provider in performance of the Agreement, Provider shall comply with 42 CFR 438.214, as may be amended from time to time, which includes, but is not limited to the selection and retention of providers, credentialing and recredentialing requirements and nondiscrimination. If Subcontractor and/or Health Plan delegate credentialing to Provider, Subcontractor and/or Health Plan will provide monitoring and oversight and Provider shall ensure that all licensed medical professionals are credentialed in accordance with Health Plan’s and the State Contract’s credentialing requirements.

  • SAMPLE (i) Unless agreed otherwise, wheeled or track lay- ing equipment shall not be operated in areas identified as needing special measures except on roads, landings, tractor roads, or skid trails approved under B5.1 or B6.422. Purchaser may be required to backblade skid trails and other ground disturbed by Purchaser’s Opera- tions within such areas in lieu of cross ditching required under B6.6. Additional special protection measures needed to protect such known areas are identified in C6.24.

  • CONTRACTOR TO PACKAGE DELIVERABLES The Contractor will package deliverables in accordance with good commercial practice and shall include a packing list showing the description of each item, the quantity and unit price unless otherwise provided in the Specifications or Supplemental Terms and Conditions, each shipping container shall be clearly and permanently marked as follows: (a) The Contractor's name and address, (b) the City’s name, address and purchase order or purchase release number and the price agreement number if applicable, (c) Container number and total number of containers, e.g. box 1 of 4 boxes, and (d) the number of the container bearing the packing list. The Contractor shall bear cost of packaging. Deliverables shall be suitably packed to secure lowest transportation costs and to conform to all the requirements of common carriers and any applicable specification. The City's count or weight shall be final and conclusive on shipments not accompanied by packing lists.

  • ODUF Packing Specifications 6.3.1 The data will be packed using ATIS EMI records. A pack will contain a minimum of one (1) message record or a maximum of ninety-nine thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine (99,999) message records plus a pack header record and a pack trailer record. One transmission can contain a maximum of ninety-nine (99) packs and a minimum of one (1) pack.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.