Reasonable Offer Challenge Process Sample Clauses

Reasonable Offer Challenge Process. A Joint Reasonable Offer Team (JROT) will be established for each Unit of Application established under this Article. This team will resolve employees' appeals arising from offers made during the mix and match process. The team will meet and make a decision within three (3) working days of receipt of the appeal. The decision will become part of the JRPT final report recommendation. It will take into consideration items such as job level, geographical location, responsibilities, status, health, family, legal precedents, community standards and past practices. The team will be made up of two employees representing Hydro One and two employees representing The Society. The members of the team must be different than those on the Joint Redeployment and Planning Team. The team's membership composition should avoid conflict of interest. The surplus employee is responsible for presenting his/her own case.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Reasonable Offer Challenge Process. A Joint Reasonable Offer Team (JROT) will be established for each Unit of Application established under this Article. This team will resolve employees' appeals arising from offers made during the mix and match process. Offers made subsequent to the final report of the JRPT process shall be subject only to the grievance/ arbitration and not to the JROT process. The team will meet and make a decision within three (3) working days of receipt of the appeal. The decision will become part of the JRPT final report recommendation. It will take into consideration items such as job level, geographical location, responsibilities, status, health, family, legal precedents, community standards and past practices. The team will be made up of two employees representing AMEC NSS and two employees representing The Society. The members of the team must be different than those on the Joint Redeployment and Planning Team. The team's membership composition should avoid conflict of interest. The surplus employee is responsible for presenting his/her own case.
Reasonable Offer Challenge Process. A Joint Reasonable Offer Team (JROT) will be established under this Article. This team will resolve employees' appeals arising from offers made during the mix and match process and vacancy transition process. Offers made subsequent to the final report of the JRPT process shall be subject only to the grievance/ arbitration and not to the JROT process. The Society’s position on the grievance is not prejudiced by that of Society members of JRPT’s and JRPT’s. The Team will meet and make a decision within three (3) working days of receipt of the appeal. The decision will become part of the JRPT final report recommendation. It will take into consideration items such as job level, geographical location, responsibilities, status, health, family, legal precedents, community standards and past practices. The team will be made up of two employees representing the IESO and two employees representing The Society. The members of the team must be different than those on the Joint Redeployment and Planning Team. The team's membership composition should avoid conflict of interest. The surplus employee is responsible for presenting his/her own case.

Related to Reasonable Offer Challenge Process

  • Assistance in Litigation or Administrative Proceedings Covered Entity shall provide written notice to Business Associate if litigation or administrative proceeding is commenced against Covered Entity, its directors, officers, or employees, based on a claimed violation by Business Associate of HIPAA, the HIPAA Rules or other laws relating to security and privacy or PHI. Upon receipt of such notice and to the extent requested by Covered Entity, Business Associate shall, and shall cause its employees, Subcontractors, or agents assisting Business Associate in the performance of its obligations under the Contract to, assist Covered Entity in the defense of such litigation or proceedings. Business Associate shall, and shall cause its employees, Subcontractor’s and agents to, provide assistance, to Covered Entity, which may include testifying as a witness at such proceedings. Business Associate or any of its employees, Subcontractors or agents shall not be required to provide such assistance if Business Associate is a named adverse party.

  • DUE PROCESS PROCEEDINGS CONTRACTOR shall fully participate in special education due process proceedings including mediations and hearings, as requested by XXX. Participation further includes the willingness to make CONTRACTOR’s staff available for witness preparation and testimony as is necessary to facilitate a due process hearing. CONTRACTOR shall also fully participate in the investigation and provision of documentation related to any complaint filed with the State of California, the Office of Civil Rights, or any other state and/or federal governmental body or agency. Full participation shall include, but in no way be limited to, cooperating with LEA representatives to provide complete answers raised by any investigator and/or the immediate provision of any and all documentation that pertains to the operation of CONTRACTOR’s program and/or the implementation of a particular student’s IEP/Individual and Family Service Plan (“IFSP”).

  • Appeals Process A. The Contractor’s appeal process shall, at a minimum:

  • LITIGATION OR ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS BA shall notify CE within forty-eight (48) hours of any litigation or administrative proceedings commenced against BA or its agents or subcontractors. In addition, BA shall make itself, and any subcontractors, employees and agents assisting BA in the performance of its obligations under the Contract or Addendum, available to CE, at no cost to CE, to testify as witnesses, or otherwise, in the event of litigation or administrative proceedings being commenced against CE, its supervisors, directors, officers, managers or employees based upon a claimed violation of HIPAA, the HITECH Act, the HIPAA regulations, or other state or federal laws relating to security and privacy, except where the BA or its subcontractors, employees or agents are a named adverse parties.

  • Alternative to Litigation 13.2.1 The Parties desire to resolve disputes arising out of this Agreement without litigation. Accordingly, the Parties agree to use the following Dispute Resolution procedures with respect to any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement or its breach.

  • PURPOSE/JUSTIFICATION OF RECOMMENDED ACTION The purpose of the Agreement is to provide the City with the services for one full-time equivalent senior criminalist from the Department to perform DNA testing, analysis, and forensic-related consulting as requested by the City, effective July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2021. The City’s current agreement with the County for this position expires on June 30, 2016. This Agreement will not result in the creation of an additional senior criminalist position, as the position was created during the previous agreement.

  • Administrative Proceedings With a view to administering in a consistent, impartial, and reasonable manner all measures of general application affecting matters covered by this Agreement, each Party shall ensure that in its administrative proceedings applying measures referred to in Article 73 to particular persons or goods of the other Party in specific cases that:

  • Extension for Foreclosure Proceedings If (a) it is necessary for the Financing Provider to have possession of the Project (as defined in the Assigned Agreement) in order for Financing Provider to cure an Event of Default which is Capable of Being Cured, as defined in Section 3.2(b), and (b) Financing Provider commences foreclosure proceedings against Seller within thirty (30) calendar days of receiving Notice of an Event of Default from PG&E or Seller, whichever is received first, then Financing Provider shall be allowed an additional period to complete such foreclosure proceedings, such period not to exceed ninety (90) calendar days; provided, however, that Financing Provider shall provide a Notice to PG&E that it intends to commence foreclosure proceedings with respect to Seller within ten (10) calendar days of receiving a Notice of such Event of Default from PG&E or Seller, whichever is received first. In the event Financing Provider or its designated Permitted Transferee succeeds to Seller’s interest in the Project as a result of foreclosure proceedings, the Financing Provider or Permitted Transferee shall be subject to the requirements of Section 3 of this Consent and Agreement.

  • How to Request an External Appeal If you remain dissatisfied with our medical appeal determination, you may request an external review by an outside review agency. In accordance with §27-18.9-8, your external appeal will be reviewed by one of the external independent review organizations (IRO) approved by the Office of the Health Insurance Commissioner. The IRO is selected using a rotational method. Your claim does not have to meet a minimum dollar threshold in order for you to be able to request an external appeal. To request an external appeal, submit a written request to us within four (4) months of your receipt of the medical appeal denial letter. We will forward your request to the outside review agency within five (5) business days, unless it is an urgent appeal, and then we will send it within two (2) business days. We may charge you a filing fee up to $25.00 per external appeal, not to exceed $75.00 per plan year. We will refund you if the denial is reversed and will waive the fee if it imposes an undue hardship for you. Upon receipt of the information, the outside review agency will notify you of its determination within ten (10) calendar days, unless it is an urgent appeal, and then you will be notified within seventy-two (72) hours. The determination by the outside review agency is binding on us. Filing an external appeal is voluntary. You may choose to participate in this level of appeal or you may file suit in an appropriate court of law (see Legal Action, below). Once a member or provider receives a decision at one of the several levels of appeals noted above, (reconsideration, appeal, external), the member or provider may not ask for an appeal at the same level again, unless additional information that could affect such decisions can be provided.

  • CONTROL; OWNERSHIP; LEGAL PROCEEDINGS The Applicant shall immediately notify the District and Comptroller’s office in writing of any actual or anticipated change in the control or ownership of the Applicant and of any legal or administrative investigations or proceedings initiated against the Applicant related to the project regardless of the jurisdiction from which such proceedings originate.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.