Public Review and Comment Sample Clauses

Public Review and Comment. These policies for administering Centers of Excellence grants were published and made available for public review and comment for a minimum of forty five (45) days. These policies were adopted after consideration of all meaningful input from the public, including broad-based participation from individuals, businesses, Tribal nations, and non-profit organizations. Public comments on these policies were accepted from February 12, 2015 – Friday, April, 17 2015, via email to: xxxxxxx@xx.xxx, or via regular mail to: CPRA, Attn: Xxxxx Xxxx, X.X. Xxx 00000, Xxxxx Xxxxx, XX 00000.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Public Review and Comment. The City of Richmond shall make a reasonable and good faith effort to seek and consider the views of the public in a manner that reflects the nature and complexity of the undertaking and its effects on historic properties. The City shall post a list of all complete and active projects on Planning and Preservation website on a monthly basis. Upon request any member of the public can review the complete record of any undertaking. The City will accept written comments from the public on both individual undertakings and the administration of the Agreement. The City shall consider and address all requests from a member of the public to review or reconsider determinations of eligibility for an undertaking in consultation with the SHPO. The City shall take written comments from the public on an undertaking into account in completing the Section 106 review. As a part of consultation, the City shall forward copies of public comments to the SHPO and consulting parties. Public comments pertaining to adverse effects shall be governed by Stipulation VI (B). The City shall respond in writing to written comments received on the administration of this Agreement, providing copies to the SHPO and consulting parties.
Sample 1Sample 2
Public Review and Comment. The FSP was available for public review and comment from May 7, 2018 to July 6, 2018 at the Xaxli'p Community Forest Corporation office at 0000 Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxx. The FSP was also posted to the XCFC web site. One public meeting was held: XCFC hosted an open house at Xaxli’p on MoFLNRO staff provided their comments by telephone conversation and follow up email on . Written comments received during the advertisement period have been considered in the “Submission for Approval”. The written comments, as well as a summary of changes to the draft FSP, are included in Appendix C - “Review and Comment”.
Sample 1
Public Review and Comment. The City of Roanoke shall make a reasonable and good faith effort to seek and consider the views of the public in a manner that reflects the nature and complexity of the undertaking and its effects on historic properties, per the SOP. Upon request, any member of the public can review the complete record of any undertaking. The City will accept written comments from the public on individual undertakings, determinations of eligibility, and the administration of the Agreement. As a part of consultation, the City shall forward copies of public comments to the SHPO and consulting parties. Public comments pertaining to adverse effects shall be governed by Stipulation VI (B). The City shall respond in writing to written comments received, providing copies to the SHPO and consulting parties.
Sample 1
Public Review and Comment. The Trustee Council shall determine which records are appropriate, or legally required to be made available, for public review comment, in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. For each record to be released upon such a determination, the Trustee Council shall determine the media or format and the procedures to be followed, including the dates and length of any public comment period, in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. Nothing in this paragraph shall apply to a Trustee's response to request for designated privileged documents from parties and non-parties as described in Section XI of this Agreement.
Sample 1

Related to Public Review and Comment

  • Ongoing Review and Revisions As set forth in Section 35.7, the Parties have agreed to the coordination and exchange of data and information under this Agreement to enhance system reliability and efficient market operations as systems exist and are contemplated as of the Effective Date. The Parties expect that these systems and the technology applicable to these systems and to the collection and exchange of data will change from time to time throughout the term of this Agreement. The Parties agree that the objectives of this Agreement can be fulfilled efficiently and economically only if the Parties, from time to time, review and, as appropriate, revise the requirements stated herein in response to such changes, including deleting, adding, or revising requirements and protocols. Each Party will negotiate in good faith in response to such revisions the other Party may propose from time to time. Nothing in this Agreement, however, shall require any Party to reach agreement with respect to any such changes, or to purchase, install, or otherwise implement new equipment, software, or devices, or functions, except as required to perform this Agreement.

  • Review and Appeal (a) Each Party shall establish or maintain judicial, quasi-judicial, or administrative tribunals or procedures for the purpose of the prompt review and, where warranted, correction of final administrative actions regarding matters covered by this Treaty. Such tribunals shall be impartial and independent of the office or authority entrusted with administrative enforcement and shall not have any substantial interest in the outcome of the matter.

  • Joint Review JADRC may, at the request of either party, review issues arising from the application of this Article.

  • Personnel File Review a. A unit member has the right upon his/her own request to review the contents of his/her personnel file. The review will be conducted in the presence of the administrator, or his/her designee, responsible for the safekeeping of such file. The employee may have a committee person assist in said review. Such review shall be conducted at a mutually agreeable time. A copy of requested material will be provided.

  • Review The practitioner reviews the treatment plan and discusses, when appropriate, case circumstances and management options with the attending (or referring) physician. The reviewer consults with the requesting physician when more clarity is needed to make an informed coverage decision. The reviewer may consult with board certified physicians from appropriate specialty areas to assist in making determinations of coverage and/or appropriateness. All such consultations will be documented in the review text. If the reviewer determines that the admission, continued stay or service requested is not a covered service, a notice of non-coverage is issued. Only a physician, behavioral health practitioner (such as a psychiatrist, doctoral-level clinical psychologist, certified addiction medicine specialist), dentist or pharmacist who has the clinical expertise appropriate to the request under review with an unrestricted license may deny coverage based on medical necessity.

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES A. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by AGREEMENT, shall be reviewed by LOCAL AGENCY’S Chief Financial Officer.

  • Review and Approval Documents specified above must be submitted for review and approval by CITY Purchasing and Contracts prior to the commencement of work by CONTRACTOR. Neither approval by CITY nor failure to disapprove the insurance furnished by CONTRACTOR shall relieve CONTRACTOR of CONTRACTOR’S full responsibility to provide the insurance required by this Contract. Compliance with the insurance requirements of this Contract shall not limit the liability of CONTRACTOR or its sub-contractors, employees or agents to CITY or others, and shall be in addition to and not in lieu of any other remedy available to CITY under this Contract or otherwise. CITY reserves the right to request and review a copy of any required insurance policy or endorsement to assure compliance with these requirements.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.