Process Review Sample Clauses

Process Review. The parties to this Agreement agree that a review will take place within three (3) years from the Execution Date to determine if the provisions in sections 11.02 to 11.04, inclusive, and Schedule 6 require adjustment or amendment and, where agreed upon, such required changes shall be made, and such adjustments as are subsequently agreed upon shall thereafter be made from time to time with the agreement in writing of the affected parties.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Process Review. In the event that a bargaining unit applicant is not selected, that employee may request, and shall be given in writing, his or her itemized score and placement according to test results within one week of the request.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Process Review. At the conclusion of the oral exam process the President of the Union or a designee agreed to by the Human Resources Director will be afforded an opportunity to meet with the oral board to review the process. Within one (1) month of the conclusion of the promotional exam two (2) members of the Human Resources Department will meet with two (2) representatives of the Union and one (1) representative of Fire Administration to review the examination.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Process Review. To determine whether the hearing was conducted in accordance with published procedures and without bias on the part of the Hearing Administrator or any CSB member. Deviations from designated procedures will not be a basis for sustaining an appeal unless significant prejudice results.
Sample 1Sample 2
Process Review. Plantronics has the right to review GoerTek 's manufacturing and quality assurance processes and to requalify the Product periodically upon notice to GoerTek . GoerTek will implement all necessary changes required by Plantronics based upon its review of GoerTek’s procedures.
Sample 1
Process Review. True Up and Qualifying Hours Reduction, Work-Unit Rebid and Layoff will be discussed at the JLMC meeting that follows the utilization of this section.
Sample 1
Process Review. In the event the Manager pays income from a Fund, the Depositary will check via the (half) yearly report and, if applicable, the minutes of the meeting in which a decision has been made to pay those amounts, whether calculations have been performed correctly in accordance with the Conditions of a Fund and Regulations.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Process Review. The MPO and TDOT will review this agreement in conjunction with each Statewide Planning Finding or when STIP/TIP management procedures are substantively changed (e.g., implementation of an electronic STIP/TIP). The focus of the review is to verify the appropriate use of the agreed-to amendment and administrative modification processes and consistency with Federal regulations. We, the undersigned, approve this Memorandum of Agreement. This Agreement will become effective upon approval of signature by all parties, and will remain in effect as long as each agency agrees to and abides by the conditions set forth in this document. This Agreement may be amended at any time, but revisions will require signature by all parties. Any signatory to this Agreement may propose amendment to the agreement at any time. All prior agreements and correspondence related to the definition and need for amendments or administrative modifications to STIP/TIPs are voided with the execution of this agreement. SIGNATURES: October 18, 2019 Mayor Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Date TPO Executive Board Chair Commissioner Date Tennessee Department of Transportation
Sample 1
Process Review. The parties agree to conduct quarterly meetings between to review account management for Non-US Exclusive Countries and the US. The US meeting shall include focus on worldwide issues. Timing of such quarterly meetings shall be scheduled to be close to the dates that EI board meetings or held, or such other dates as are mutually agreed on by the parties. Amended & Restated MSN/Expedia Carriage Agreement FINAL -- June 29, 2001 The parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the Effective Date. MICROSOFT CORPORATION EXPEDIA, INC. By /s/ Xxxxxxx Xxxx By /s/ Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx -------------------------------- -------------------------------- Name (Print) Xxxxxxx Xxxx Name (Print) Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx ---------------------- ---------------------- Title VP-MSN US Region Title Sr. Vice President and ----------------------------- Chief Financial Officer ----------------------------- [SIGNATURE PAGE TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED MSN/EXPEDIA CARRIAGE AND CROSS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROMOTION AGREEMENT.] --------------------- Amended & Restated MSN/Expedia Carriage Agreement FINAL -- June 29, 2001 Exhibit A --------- Mock-Up of the Network ---------------------- Template -------- Amended & Restated MSN/Expedia Carriage Agreement FINAL -- June 29, 2001 Mock-Up of the Co-Branded Site Home Page ---------------------------------------- Amended & Restated MSN/Expedia Carriage Agreement FINAL -- June 29, 2001 Mock-Up of the Co-Branded Site Home Page ---------------------------------------- Amended & Restated MSN/Expedia Carriage Agreement FINAL -- June 29, 2001 Exhibit B --------- List of EI Named Competitors EI Named Competitors in Exclusive Countries: US |X| Travelocity |X| HRN |X| Orbitz |X| Cheaptickets |X| Sidestep |X| Priceline |X| Hotwire UK |X| Travelocity |X| Xxxxxx Xxxx |X| British Airways |X| Lastminute |X| Ebookers Canada |X| Travelocity |X| Groupe Transat |X| Air Canada |X| Tripeze |X| iTravel2000 Germany |X| Travelocity |X| Travel-Overland |X| TravelChannel |X| Ebookers |X| Travel24 France |X| Travelocity |X| Lastminute |X| Nouvelles Frontieres |X| Travelprice |X| Promovacances EI Named Competitors in non-exclusive countries |X| Travelocity |X| HRN |X| Lastminute |X| Ebookers |X| OTP Amended & Restated MSN/Expedia Carriage Agreement FINAL -- June 29, 2001 Exhibit C --------- List of Essential Travel Elements
Sample 1

Related to Process Review

  • Contract Review Agent shall have reviewed all material contracts of Borrowers including, without limitation, leases, union contracts, labor contracts, vendor supply contracts, license agreements and distributorship agreements and such contracts and agreements shall be satisfactory in all respects to Agent;

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Periodic Review The General Counsel shall periodically review the Procurement Integrity Procedures with OSC personnel in order to ascertain potential areas of exposure to improper influence and to adopt desirable revisions for more effective avoidance of improper influences.

  • Asset Representations Review Process Section 3.01 Asset Representations Review Notices and Identification of Review Receivables. On receipt of an Asset Representations Review Notice from the Seller according to Section 5.7 of the Receivables Purchase Agreement, the Asset Representations Reviewer will start an Asset Representations Review. The Servicer will provide the list of Review Receivables to the Asset Representations Reviewer promptly upon receipt of the Asset Representations Review Notice. The Asset Representations Reviewer will not be obligated to start, and will not start, an Asset Representations Review until an Asset Representations Review Notice and the related list of Review Receivables is received. The Asset Representations Reviewer is not obligated to verify (i) whether the conditions to the initiation of the Asset Representations Review and the issuance of an Asset Representations Review Notice described in Section 7.6 of the Indenture were satisfied or (ii) the accuracy or completeness of the list of Review Receivables provided by the Servicer.

  • Periodic Reviews During January of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall review Executive's Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and additional benefits then being provided to Executive. Following each such review, the Company may in its discretion increase the Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and benefits; however, the Company shall not decrease such items during the period Executive serves as an employee of the Company. Prior to November 30th of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall communicate in writing the results of such review to Executive.

  • Asset Review (a) On or prior to each Distribution Date, based on the CREFC® Delinquent Loan Status Report and/or the CREFC® Loan Periodic Update File delivered by the Master Servicer for such Distribution Date, the Certificate Administrator shall determine if an Asset Review Trigger has occurred during the related Collection Period. If an Asset Review Trigger is determined to have occurred, the Certificate Administrator shall promptly provide notice to the Asset Representations Reviewer, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer and all Certificateholders. Any notice required to be delivered to the Certificateholders pursuant to this Article XI shall be delivered by the Certificate Administrator (i) by posting such notice on the Certificate Administrator’s Website and (ii) by mailing such notice to the Certificateholders’ addresses appearing in the Certificate Register in the case of Definitive Certificates and by delivering such notice via the Depository in the case of Book-Entry Certificates. The Certificate Administrator shall include in the Form 10-D relating to the Collection Period in which the Asset Review Trigger occurred, notice of its determination together with the following statement describing the events that caused the Asset Review Trigger to occur: “As of the [Date of Distribution], the following Mortgage Loans identified below are 60 or more days delinquent and an Asset Review Trigger as defined in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has occurred.” On each Distribution Date occurring after providing such notice to Certificateholders, the Certificate Administrator, based on information provided to it by the Master Servicer and/or the Special Servicer, as applicable, shall determine whether (1) any additional Mortgage Loan has become a Delinquent Loan, (2) any Mortgage Loan has ceased to be a Delinquent Loan and (3) whether an Asset Review Trigger has ceased to exist, and, if there is an occurrence of any of the events or circumstances identified in clauses (1), (2) and/or (3), deliver such information in a written notice (which may be via email) in the form of Exhibit LL within two (2) Business Days of such determination to the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Operating Advisor and the Asset Representations Reviewer. If Certificateholders evidencing not less than 5% of the aggregate Voting Rights of the Certificates deliver to the Certificate Administrator, within 90 days after the filing of the Form 10-D reporting the occurrence of an Asset Review Trigger, a written direction requesting a vote to commence an Asset Review (an “Asset Review Vote Election”), then the Certificate Administrator shall promptly provide written notice thereof to the Asset Representations Reviewer and to all Certificateholders and conduct a solicitation of votes in accordance with Section 5.12 regarding whether to authorize an Asset Review. In the event there is an affirmative vote to authorize an Asset Review by Holders of Certificates evidencing at least a majority of an Asset Review Quorum within 150 days of receipt of the Asset Review Vote Election (an “Affirmative Asset Review Vote”), the Certificate Administrator shall promptly provide written notice thereof (the “Asset Review Notice”) to all parties to this Agreement, the Underwriters, the Mortgage Loan Sellers, the Directing Holder, the Risk Retention Consultation Party and the other Certificateholders (such notice to Certificateholders to be effected by posting such notice on the Certificate Administrator’s Website and by mailing such notice to the Certificateholders’ addresses appearing in the Certificate Register in the case of Definitive Certificates and by delivering such notice via the Depository in the case of Book-Entry Certificates). Upon receipt of an Asset Review Notice, the Asset Representations Reviewer shall request access to the Secure Data Room by providing the Certificate Administrator with a certification substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit KK. Upon receipt of such certification, the Certificate Administrator shall grant the Asset Representations Reviewer access to the Secure Data Room. In the event an Affirmative Asset Review Vote has not occurred within such 150-day period following the receipt of the Asset Review Vote Election, no Certificateholder may request a vote or cast a vote for an Asset Review and the Asset Representations Reviewer will not be required to review any Delinquent Loan unless and until (A) an additional Mortgage Loan has become a Delinquent Loan after the expiration of such 150-day period, (B) a new Asset Review Trigger has occurred as a result or an Asset Review Trigger is otherwise in effect, (C) the Certificate Administrator has received an Asset Review Vote Election within 90 days after the filing of a Form 10-D reporting the occurrence of the events described in clauses (A) and (B) in this sentence and (D) an Affirmative Asset Review Vote has occurred within 150 days after the Asset Review Vote Election described in clause (C) in this sentence. After the occurrence of any Asset Review Vote Election or an Affirmative Asset Review Vote, no Certificateholder may make any additional Asset Review Vote Election except as described in the immediately preceding sentence. Any reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the Certificate Administrator in connection with administering such vote will be paid as an expense of the Trust from the Collection Account. The Certificate Administrator shall be entitled to administer any vote in connection with the foregoing through an agent.

  • Commercialization Reports Throughout the term of this Agreement and during the Sell-Off Period, and within thirty (30) days of December 31st of each year, Company will deliver to University written reports of Company’s and Sublicensees’ efforts and plans to develop and commercialize the innovations covered by the Licensed Rights and to make and sell Licensed Products. Company will have no obligation to prepare commercialization reports in years where (a) Company delivers to University a written Sales Report with active sales, and (b) Company has fulfilled all Performance Milestones. In relation to each of the Performance Milestones each commercialization report will include sufficient information to demonstrate achievement of those Performance Milestones and will set out timeframes and plans for achieving those Performance Milestones which have not yet been met.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.