Other Recommendations Sample Clauses

Other Recommendations. B. Under each section, the Management Plan (or plans) will summarize past activities and describe anticipated activities, including the following:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Other Recommendations. MPHS strongly recommends the creation of a board of citizen volunteers comprised of patients and other interested parties to review operations, finances, services, and customer satisfaction levels. This oversight group will assure that the Regional Medical Center effectively meets the needs of Catoca Mines as well as the most urgent healthcare needs of the surrounding area.
Other Recommendations. As a model for development, the following picture is a clinic currently under construction which is similar in size, layout, and intended services to the anticipated Regional Medical Center. By combining the invaluable insights and experiences of the current medical providers, and the layouts developed here and in other situations, MPHS will be able to develop the proposed Regional Medical Center as efficiently and as quickly as possible. MPHS has the experience and human capital to establish, implement, monitor and sustain this center. __________________________________________________________________________________________17 Contrato SMC – LTD [CATOCA] SMC – Sociedade Mineira de Catoca, Lda ____________________________________________________________________________________________
Other Recommendations. To assure compliance with the CIA and applicable Medicare, Medicaid, and other Federal health care program statutes, regulations and policies, the IRO shall make any other suggestions it deems necessary.
Other Recommendations. 14. The participants noted that at the first Steering Committee meeting, a representative of Hungary would participate as foreseen under the SDC-UNECE Agreement. The participants also suggested that UNECE should contact other countries and organizations to participate in the meeting on 20 January 2010, including Norway, Switzerland, WHO/EURO, the WHO country office in Moldova, the WHO Collaborating Centre in Denmark (DHI) as well as the NGO Women in Europe for a Common Future (WECF) and the NGO Women-for-Water.
Other Recommendations. Design Standards. Establish design standards to ensure coordinated and quality development of all architectural elements. Street Furniture. Select a cohesive collection of pedestrian features and furniture that are similar in style throughout the trail and pathway areas. Choose items that are made of high-quality materials that are easy to maintain or replace. Develop standards for lighting (roadway/parking, pedestrian, and trail), bicycle racks, handrails, benches and picnic tables, trash receptacles, shelters, fencing, and safety bollards.
Other Recommendations. There is no officially recognized community planning group for this area.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Other Recommendations. It is clearly demonstrated that the survey questionnaire planned for self-completion by seven and eight year old children should be as short as possible. Focus of the question should refer to only one experience or type of action, while the use of conditional question formulations (‘if – then’) should be avoided. The wording of questions should be simple. Only one type of instruction for selection and marking the answer (e.g. circling) should be used throughout the whole questionnaire. Additional introductory sentences and/or instructions that are not crucial should be avoided. A simple layout in the form of one question per page is recommended. Moreover, any unnecessary content or information should be avoided in a questionnaire for eight and seven year old children, since this can distract children from answering the questions. It is also recommended that questions should be written in capital letters using a simple font of a larger size without graphical solutions (e.g., bold type) for emphasis.
Other Recommendations. In the event that the Sri Lanka Mission decides to develop a DG program in the areas proposed above, the team offers the following recommendations for implementing the program and maximizing its impact: Program management The team believes that the proposed DG program can best be implemented by a US PVO partner under the oversight of the Mission. We believe that the program requires that the implementing organization establish an in country presence. We also recommend that the lead PVO partner be part of a consortium of US and Sri Lankan organizations that can provide expertise in the three program areas. Given this, we estimate that the minimum amount of funding necessary to successfully implement a DG program along the lines described above is approximately $800,000 per year (excluding the cost of additional Mission staff). ESF DG allocations for Sri Lanka for FY 2001 have been discussed in the range of $750,000 and $3,000,000. Depending on the actual funding level, the team recommends that USAID consider hiring one to two additional staff persons (one local, one American) to properly oversee the development and management of the proposed program. These individuals could also help coordinate and manage the array of USG DG-related programs (e.g.: the Public Diplomacy small grants program, the 416B-funded program, etc.).

Related to Other Recommendations

  • Board Recommendations (a) In connection with the Merger and the Stockholders’ Meeting, the Board of Directors of the Company shall (i) subject to Section 5.5(b), recommend to the Company Stockholders to vote in favor of the approval of the Merger Agreement and the Merger and use all commercially reasonable efforts to obtain the necessary approvals by the Company Stockholders of this Agreement, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement and (ii) otherwise comply with the legal requirements applicable to such meeting.

  • Company Board Recommendation (a) The Company hereby consents to the Offer and represents, as of the date of this Agreement, that the Company Board, at a meeting duly called and held, has unanimously made the Company Board Recommendation. Subject in each case to Section 6.1(b), the Company hereby consents to the inclusion of a description of the Company Board Recommendation in the Offer Documents and, during the Pre-Closing Period, neither the Company Board nor any committee thereof shall (i) (A) fail to make, withdraw (or modify or qualify in a manner adverse to Parent or Purchaser), or publicly propose to fail to make, withdraw (or modify or qualify in a manner adverse to Parent or Purchaser), the Company Board Recommendation or (B) approve, recommend or declare advisable, or publicly propose to approve, recommend, endorse or declare advisable, any Acquisition Proposal, (ii) fail to include the Company Board Recommendation in the Schedule 14D-9 when disseminated to the Company’s stockholders (any action described in clause (i) or (ii) being referred to as a “Company Adverse Change Recommendation”), (iii) publicly make any recommendation in connection with a tender offer or exchange offer (other than the Offer) other than a recommendation against such offer or (iv) approve, recommend or declare advisable, or propose to approve, recommend or declare advisable, or allow the Company to execute or enter into any Contract (other than an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement) with respect to any Acquisition Proposal requiring, or reasonably expected to cause, the Company to abandon, terminate, delay or fail to consummate, or that would otherwise materially impede, interfere with or be inconsistent with, the Transactions.

  • Board Recommendation The Acquiror Company Board, by unanimous written consent, has determined that this Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement are advisable and in the best interests of the Acquiror Company’s stockholders and has duly authorized this Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

  • Change of Recommendation Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, at any time prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, the Company’s Board of Directors may, if it concludes in good faith (after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal advisors) that the failure to take such action would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law, make an Adverse Recommendation Change; provided that prior to any such Adverse Recommendation Change, (A) the Company shall have given Parent and Merger Sub prompt written notice advising them of (x) the decision of the Company’s Board of Directors to take such action and the reasons therefor and (y) in the event the decision relates to an Alternative Transaction Proposal, a summary of the material terms and conditions of the Alternative Transaction Proposal and other information requested to be provided with respect thereto pursuant to this Section 5.4, including the information required to be provided pursuant to Section 5.4(b) and (c), (B) the Company shall have given Parent and Merger Sub three (3) Business Days (the “Notice Period”) after delivery of each such notice to propose revisions to the terms of this Agreement (or make another proposal) and, during the Notice Period, the Company shall, and shall direct its financial advisors and outside legal advisors to, negotiate with Parent in good faith (to the extent Parent desires to negotiate) to make such adjustments in the terms and conditions of this Agreement so that, if applicable, such Alternative Transaction Proposal ceases to constitute (in the judgment of the Company’s Board of Directors, after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal advisors), a Superior Proposal or, if the Adverse Recommendation Change does not involve an Alternative Transaction Proposal, to make such adjustments in the terms and conditions of this Agreement so that such Adverse Recommendation Change is otherwise not necessary, and (C) the Company’s Board of Directors shall have determined in good faith, after considering the results of such negotiations and giving effect to the proposals made by Parent and Merger Sub, if any, that such Alternative Transaction Proposal, if applicable, continues to constitute a Superior Proposal or that such Adverse Recommendation Change is otherwise still required; provided further that, (1) if during the Notice Period described in clause (B) of this paragraph any revisions are made to the Superior Proposal, if applicable, and the Company’s Board of Directors in its good faith judgment determines (after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal advisors) that such revisions are material (it being understood that any change in the purchase price or form of consideration in such Superior Proposal shall be deemed a material revision), the Company shall deliver a new written notice to Parent and shall comply with the requirements of this Section 5.4(d) with respect to such new written notice except that the new Notice Period shall be two (2) Business Days instead of three (3) Business Days and (2) in the event the Company’s Board of Directors does not make the determination referred to in clause (C) of this paragraph but thereafter determines to make an Adverse Recommendation Change pursuant to this Section 5.4(d), the procedures referred to in clauses (A), (B) and (C) above shall apply anew and shall also apply to any subsequent withdrawal, amendment or change.

  • Recommendations It is recommended that:

  • Audit Reports; Management Letters; Recommendations Promptly after any request by the Administrative Agent or any Lender, copies of any detailed audit reports, management letters or recommendations submitted to the board of directors (or the audit committee of the board of directors) of any Loan Party by independent accountants in connection with the accounts or books of any Loan Party or any of its Subsidiaries, or any audit of any of them.

  • Company Board Approval The Company Board has unanimously (i) determined that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders, and declared it advisable, to enter into this Agreement and consummate the Merger upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein; (ii) approved the execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Company, the performance by the Company of its covenants and other obligations hereunder, and the consummation of the Merger upon the terms and conditions set forth herein; and (iii) resolved to recommend that the Company Stockholders adopt this Agreement and approve the Merger in accordance with the DGCL (collectively, the “Company Board Recommendation”), which Company Board Recommendation has not been withdrawn, rescinded or modified in any way as of the date hereof.

  • Company Board Section 2.3(a)........... 9

  • No Government Recommendation or Approval The Subscriber understands that no federal or state agency has passed upon or made any recommendation or endorsement of the offering of the Shares.

  • Fairness Opinions (a) Unless waived by PSINet, there shall have been delivered to PSINet an opinion of independent investment bankers selected by PSINet, in form and substance satisfactory to PSINet, (i) as to the fairness to PSINet and its stockholders from a financial point of view of the issuance of the IXC Shares and the consummation of the transactions contemplated by, and in connection with, this Agreement and (ii) as to the value of the IRUs being granted by IXC to PSINet and the securities being issued or issuable by PSINet to IXC pursuant to this Agreement.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.