Means of Verification. Under this column, Chief Directors are to indicate the means by which the various targets indicated would be verified. Chief Directors are to note that these indicators would constitute the basis on which targets undertaken would be assessed during the evaluation exercise. Risks/Assumptions Chief Directors are to delineate the circumstances under which the delivery of set targets may be compromised. These may include, but would not be limited to, targets requiring collaboration with stakeholders and resource constraints.
Means of Verification. Communiques from the Inter-American Court reporting that hearings have been granted on Xxxxxx Xxxx vs. Ecuador and Xxxxxxx Sisters vs. El Salvador • Judgments on the cases Xxxxxx del Campo vs. Mexico, Tibi vs. Ecuador and Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx vs. Paraguay • Report on the mission to Mexico
Means of Verification. Activities Activity 1.1.1
Means of Verification. Workshop report Indicator 1.2.2 Standard Coordination and Support Services # of database systems created and maintained 2
Means of Verification. DPPB annual report Data base information products, such as monthly early warning and food security bulletin etc Indicator 1.2.3 CUSTOM Coordination and Support Services Number of training sessions conducted on data base and information management 4 Means of Verification : Training report Participants attendance Activities Activity 1.2.1 Standard Activity : Not Selected
Means of Verification. DBBP and UNOCHA Annual report Indicator 2.1.2 Standard Coordination and Support Services # of workshops on humanitarian planning, coordination and management 2 Means of Verification :
Means of Verification. EMP updated; use by BMA and other key migration actors of the EMP and other analytical products and services as migration policy and management tools A 2.2 Enhance capabilities of One Stop Shop (OSS) for documentation of foreigners Reporting coordinators: MoI 1. Development of OSS for documentation of foreigners at central and regional levels. Means of verification: Revised and updated concept of One-Stop Shop for documentation of foreigners approved; needs assessment of OSS carried out and endorsed; BMA website developed and upgraded including versions in several languages and with dedicated sections for each type of migrant/purpose of stay/migration to Moldova. 1. Consolidation of capabilities of OSS for documentation of foreigners at central and regional levels. Means of verification: OSS premises in Chisinau, Balti and Comrat refurbished; equipment procured and installed; staff capacities enhanced. 1. Ensure operational functionality of OSS for documentation of foreigners at central and regional levels in line with European standards and best practices. Means of verification: OSS fully operational; ‘on-the-spot’, mobile and online services provided. A 2.3 Ensure operational mechanism for combating irregular migration Reporting coordinators: MoI 1. Development of inland detection and expulsion capabilities. Means of verification: Policy and regulatory framework amended in line with European standards and best practices; needs assessment of dedicated units for combatting illegal migration and Centre for Temporary Detention of Foreigners (CTDF) carried out and endorsed. 1. Consolidation of inland detection and expulsion capabilities. Means of verification: Equipment procured and installed for dedicated units for combatting illegal migration and CTDF; staff capacities enhanced; cooperation with Border Police ensured. 1. Ensure effective inland detection and expulsion mechanism. Means of verification: Dedicated units for combatting illegal migration and CTDF operational in accordance with European standards and best practices. A 2.4 Ensure operational system for integration of foreigners, refugees and beneficiaries of humanitarian protection Reporting coordinators: MoI, MLSPF 1. Creation of Integration Centres for foreigners (ICF) and Integration Centres for refugees and beneficiaries of humanitarian protection (ICR). Means of verifications: Policy and regulatory framework amended in line with European standards and best practices; needs assessment of ICF a...
Means of Verification. Information exchange with EU Member States and other foreign counterparts on new ID samples carried out. 2. Ensure efficient and real-time exchange of information regarding the lost and stolen passports.
Means of Verification. Information exchange with EU Member States and other foreign counterparts on new ID samples carried out. 3.1 Development and use of Public Key Directory (PKD). Means of verification: Feasibility study carried out and endorsed, procurement carried out, capacities strengthened for PKD use. 3.2 Implementation of rules of International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) in document issuance and PKD integration. Means of verification: ICAO rules implemented and PKD integrated. 3. Extension to non-ICAO PKDs. Means of verification: extension to non-ICAO PKDs carried out. 3. Ensure operational national PKD. Means of verification: National PKD fully operational and interoperable with ICAO and non-ICAO systems.
Means of Verification. Needs assessment of specialised central and regional units (MOI, PGO) tasked with investigating cyber-crime, money laundering, drugs and terrorism carried out and endorsed; SOPs developed, including provisions for effective undercover operations; feasibility study for dedicated IIS carried out and endorsed. 3. Consolidation of capabilities in fighting cyber-crime, money laundering, drugs and terrorism. Means of verification: Dedicated IIS procured and installed; PDP standards incorporated; interoperability with other national IIS ensured; equipment for fighting cyber-crime, money laundering, drugs and terrorism; staff capacities enhanced. 3. Specialised units tasked with fighting cyber-crime, money laundering, drugs and terrorism, and dedicated IIS, operational in accordance with European standards and best practices. Means of verification: Specialised units functional; dedicated IIS operational; analytical products and services identifying risks and threats used by law enforcement and other services as cyber-crime, money laundering, drugs, terrorism detection and prevention policy and management tools. A 3.2 Improve performance in preventing and fighting all forms of corruption, including high-level corruption, in all law enforcement institutions and agencies Reporting coordinators: NAC, MoI, PGO, Customs Service, National Integrity Commission (NIC) 1. Development of capabilities in preventing and fighting high-level corruption and corruption in all law enforcement institutions and agencies, including training of law enforcement authorities in financial investigation and asset recovery procedures. Means of verification: Needs assessment at MOI, PGO, NAC and Customs Service in fighting corruption in law enforcement, including specialisation in financial investigations carried out and endorsed; SOPs developed, including provisions for effective undercover operations; feasibility study for dedicated IIS carried out and endorsed; training of law-enforcement authorities in financial investigations and asset recovery procedures; well serviced hotlines for citizen complaints on corruption cases set-up and maintained. 1.1 Consolidation of capabilities in fighting corruption in law enforcement institutions and agencies. Means of verification: Dedicated IIS procured and installed; PDP standards incorporated; interoperability with other national IIS ensured; equipment for fighting corruption in law enforcement procured. 1.2 Draft and systematically enforce the bylaw...
