Information Used to Calculate M2M Settlements Sample Clauses

Information Used to Calculate M2M Settlements. For each M2M Flowgate there are two components of the M2M settlement, a redispatch component and a NY-NJ PAR coordination component. Both M2M settlement components are defined below. For the redispatch component, market settlements under this M2M Schedule will be calculated based on the following: the Non-Monitoring RTO’s real-time Market Flow, determined in accordance with Section 7.1 above, on each M2M Flowgate compared to its M2M Entitlement for M2M Flowgates eligible for redispatch on each M2M Flowgate; and the ex-ante Shadow Price at each M2M Flowgate. For the NY-NJ PARs coordination component, Market settlements under this M2M Schedule will be calculated based on the following: actual real-time flow on each of the NY-NJ PARs compared to its target flow (TargetPARx); PSF for each NY-NJ PAR onto each M2M Flowgate; and the ex-ante Shadow Price at each M2M Flowgate. Either or both of the Parties shall be excused from paying an M2MPARSettlement (described in Section 8.3 of this Schedule D) to the other Party at times when a Storm Watch is in effect in New York and the operating requirements and other criteria set forth in Section 8.3.1 below are satisfied.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (16)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Information Used to Calculate M2M Settlements. For each Flowgate there are two components of the M2M settlement, a redispatch component and a NY-NJ PAR coordination component. Both M2M settlement components are defined below. For the redispatch component, market settlements under this M2M Schedule will be calculated based on the following: the Non-Monitoring RTO’s real-time Market Flow, determined in accordance with Section 7.1 above, on each M2M Redispatch Flowgate compared to its M2M Entitlement for M2M Redispatch Flowgates eligible for redispatch on each M2M Redispatch Flowgate; and the ex-ante Shadow Price at each M2M Redispatch Flowgate. When determining M2M settlements for a M2M Redispatch Flowgate, each Party will use the M2M Entitlement that corresponds to the period/group for which the real-time Market Flow is being calculated except for the following scenarios: When the Non-Monitoring RTO’s M2M Entitlement is negative and the net market flow of the Non-Monitoring RTO is greater than or equal to zero the M2M Entitlement will be set to zero. When the Non-Monitoring RTO’s M2M Entitlement is negative and the net market flow of the Non-Monitoring RTO is also negative, but exceeds the M2M Entitlement, both the M2M Entitlement and market flow will be set to zero. Redispatch coordination for Other Coordinated Flowgates is not subject to redispatch settlement under Section 8.2 of this Schedule D. NY-NJ PAR coordination for Other Coordinated Flowgates is subject to NY-NJ PAR coordination settlement under Section 8.3 of this Schedule D . For the NY-NJ PARs coordination component, Market settlements under this M2M Schedule will be calculated based on the following: actual real-time flow on each of the NY-NJ PARs compared to its target flow (TargetPARx); PSF for each NY-NJ PAR onto each M2M Flowgate; and the ex-ante Shadow Price at each M2M Flowgate. Either or both of the Parties shall be excused from paying an M2MPARSettlement (described in Section 8.3 of this Schedule D) to the other Party at times when a Storm Watch is in effect in New York and the operating requirements and other criteria set forth in Section 8.3.1 below are satisfied.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (12)
Information Used to Calculate M2M Settlements. For each M2M Flowgate there are two components of the M2M settlement, a redispatch component and a NY-NJ PAR coordination component. Both M2M settlement components are defined below. For the redispatch component, market settlements under this M2M Schedule will be calculated based on the following:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)

Related to Information Used to Calculate M2M Settlements

  • DATA USED FOR CALCULATIONS The calculations for payments under this Agreement shall be initially based upon the valuations that are placed upon all taxable property in the District, including the Applicant’s Qualified Property, by the Appraisal District in its annual certified tax roll submitted to the District for each Tax Year pursuant to TEXAS TAX CODE § 26.01 on or about July 25 of each year of this Agreement. Immediately upon receipt of the valuation information by the District, the District shall submit the valuation information to the Third Party selected and appointed under Section 4.3. The certified tax roll data shall form the basis of the calculation of any and all amounts due under this Agreement. All other data utilized by the Third Party to make the calculations contemplated by this Agreement shall be based upon the best available current estimates. The data utilized by the Third Party shall be adjusted from time to time by the Third Party to reflect actual amounts, subsequent adjustments by the Appraisal District to the District’s certified tax roll or any other changes in student counts, tax collections, or other data.

  • DATA FOR CALCULATIONS The initial calculations for any payments owing under this Agreement shall be based upon the valuations placed upon the Qualified Property by the Appraisal District in its annual certified appraisal roll submitted to the District pursuant to § 26.01 of the TEXAS TAX CODE in or about July of each year of this Agreement. The certified appraisal roll data shall form the basis from which any and all amounts due under this Agreement are calculated, and the data utilized by the Consultant will be adjusted as necessary to reflect any subsequent adjustments by the Appraisal District to the District’s appraisal roll. Any estimates used by the Consultant to make calculations as required by this Agreement shall be based on the best and most current information available. The Consultant shall from time to time adjust the data utilized to reflect actual amounts, subsequent adjustments by the Appraisal District to the District’s certified appraisal roll, or any other relevant changes to material items such as student counts or tax collections.

  • SUBMISSION OF THE MONTHLY MI REPORT 4.1 The completed MI Report shall be completed electronically and returned to the Authority by uploading the electronic MI Report computer file to MISO in accordance with the instructions provided in MISO.

  • NASPO ValuePoint Summary and Detailed Usage Reports In addition to other reports that may be required by this solicitation, the Contractor shall provide the following NASPO ValuePoint reports.

  • Single Audit Report A. The parties shall comply with the requirements of the Single Audit Act of 1984, P.L. 98-502, ensuring that the single audit report includes the coverage stipulated in 2 CFR 200.

  • Offense Level Calculations i. The base offense level is 7, pursuant to Guideline § 2B1.1(a)(1).

  • Certification of Funds; Budget and Fiscal Provisions; Termination in the Event of Non-Appropriation This Agreement is subject to the budget and fiscal provisions of the City’s Charter. Charges will accrue only after prior written authorization certified by the Controller, and the amount of City’s obligation hereunder shall not at any time exceed the amount certified for the purpose and period stated in such advance authorization. This Agreement will terminate without penalty, liability or expense of any kind to City at the end of any fiscal year if funds are not appropriated for the next succeeding fiscal year. If funds are appropriated for a portion of the fiscal year, this Agreement will terminate, without penalty, liability or expense of any kind at the end of the term for which funds are appropriated. City has no obligation to make appropriations for this Agreement in lieu of appropriations for new or other agreements. City budget decisions are subject to the discretion of the Mayor and the Board of Supervisors. Contractor’s assumption of risk of possible non-appropriation is part of the consideration for this Agreement. THIS SECTION CONTROLS AGAINST ANY AND ALL OTHER PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT.

  • Determination of One-Month LIBOR Pursuant to the terms of the Global Agency Agreement, the Global Agent shall calculate the Class Coupons for the applicable Classes of Notes (including MAC Notes on which the Exchange Administrator has directed the Global Agent to make payments) for each Accrual Period (after the first Accrual Period) on the applicable LIBOR Adjustment Date. “One-Month LIBOR” will be determined by using the “Interest Settlement Rate” for U.S. dollar deposits with a maturity of one month set by ICE Benchmark Administration Limited (“ICE”) as of 11:00 a.m. (London time) on the LIBOR Adjustment Date (the “ICE Method”). ICE’s Interest Settlement Rates are currently displayed on Bloomberg L.P.’s page “BBAM.” That page, or any other page that may replace page BBAM on that service or any other service that ICE nominates as the information vendor to display the ICE’s Interest Settlement Rates for deposits in U.S. dollars, is a “Designated Page.” ICE’s Interest Settlement Rates currently are rounded to five decimal places. If ICE’s Interest Settlement Rate does not appear on the Designated Page as of 11:00 a.m. (London time) on a LIBOR Adjustment Date, or if the Designated Page is not then available, One-Month LIBOR for that date will be the most recently published Interest Settlement Rate. If ICE no longer sets an Interest Settlement Rate, Freddie Mac will designate an alternative index that has performed, or that Freddie Mac (or its agent) expects to perform, in a manner substantially similar to ICE’s Interest Settlement Rate.

  • HHS Single Audit Unit will notify Grantee to complete the Single Audit Determination Form If Grantee fails to complete the form within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of notice, Grantee maybe subject to sanctions and remedies for non-compliance.

  • Liability Calculation Method Per Claim Unless subject to a fixed dollar copayment, the calculation of Member liability on claims for Out-of-Area Covered Health Care Services processed through the BlueCard Program will be based on the lower of the provider’s billed charges or the negotiated price made available to Blue Shield by the Host Blue. Host Blues determine a negotiated price, which is reflected in the terms of each Host Blue’s health care provider contracts. The negotiated price made available to Blue Shield by the Host Blue may be represented by one of the following:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.