Industrial Security. 5.7.1. Industrial security is the application of protective measures and procedures to prevent, detect and recover from the loss or compromise of classified information handled by industry in contracts. NATO classified information disseminated to industry, generated as a result of a contract with industry, and classified contracts with industry shall be protected in accordance with NATO Security Policy and supporting directives.
Industrial Security. 7.1. A contractor facility used for contracts in which NATO classified information is handled on CIS shall be established to meet the aggregate requirement for the Security Objectives.
Industrial Security. (a) Except to the extent that disclosure thereof is prohibited by applicable law, Section 3.27(a) of the Disclosure Schedule sets forth a true and complete list of all facility and personnel security clearances held by Sellers and Acquired Subsidiaries and any of their respective directors, officers or employees by category in connection with the Business.
Industrial Security. Any proposal receiving an Unacceptable rating for Factor 1, Subfactor 1 will be ineligible for award and will NOT be evaluated further. Proposals receiving an Acceptable rating for Factor 1, Subfactor 1 will then be evaluated further against remaining subfactors in Technical Capability (Factor 1), Past Performance (Factor 2) and Price (Factor 3). The Administrative criteria will be used as part of the determination of contractor responsibility IAW FAR 9.104-1. A combined Technical/Risk rating technique will be used to evaluate Factor 1, subfactors 2-4. The Government will conduct evaluations at the subfactor level, however an individual color rating for subfactors 2-4 within Factor 1 will not be assigned. Instead, the Government will assign a single color rating at the Factor 1 level, based on the evaluation findings and risk associated with subfactors 2-4. Subfactors 2-4 within Factor 1 are equal in importance. Factor 2 will receive an overall confidence assessment rating. Factor 3 will not be given a color rating or scored. Factor 1 is individually more important than Factor 2 at the Factor level. Factor 1 and Factor 2 when combined are significantly more important than Factor 3. Table M.1 Volume Factor Title Evaluation Rating I N/A Administrative Not Assigned Individual Rating II Factor 1 Technical Capability Color/Risk Subfactor 1 Industrial Security Acceptable/Unacceptable Subfactor 2 Technical and Management Approach Not Assigned Individual Rating Subfactor 3 Task Order 1 Not Assigned Individual Rating Subfactor 4 Task Order 2 Not Assigned Individual Rating III Factor 2 Past Performance Confidence Rating
Industrial Security. The Company and its Subsidiaries are in material compliance with, and at all times since January 1, 2009 have been in material compliance with, all national security obligations, including those specified in the NISPOM, and, since January 1, 2009, no facility security clearances of the Company and its Subsidiaries issued or granted by any Governmental Agency have been revoked.
Industrial Security. (1) In the event that either Contracting Party or legal entities of its state intend to award a Classified Contract to be performed within the territory of the state of the other Contracting Party, the Contracting Party of the state in which its performance is to take place will assume responsibility for the protection of Classified Information related to the Classified Contract in accordance with its national legislation.
Industrial Security. The Customer is solely responsible for the conception, im- plementation and maintenance of a holistic, state-of-the-art security concept to protect its plants, systems, machines and networks on which the Software is used, against Cyber- threats. Such concept should inter alia include:
Industrial Security. 1. A contractor who concludes a classified contract shall, in accordance with its national regulations, assume responsibility for the protection of such classified information.
