Inapplicability of Anti-takeover Statutes Sample Clauses

Inapplicability of Anti-takeover Statutes. The board of directors of the Company has taken and will take all actions necessary to ensure that the restrictions applicable to business combinations contained in Section 203 of the DGCL are, and will be, inapplicable to the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement and the Voting Agreements and to the consummation of the Merger and the other Contemplated Transactions. No other state takeover statute or similar Legal Requirement applies or purports to apply to the Merger, this Agreement, the Voting Agreements or any of the other Contemplated Transactions.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Inapplicability of Anti-takeover Statutes. Assuming the accuracy of the representations and warranties of Merger Subsidiary and Parent in Section 4.4, there is no takeover or anti-takeover statute or similar Law, including Section 203 of the DGCL, applicable to this Agreement and the Transactions that requires additional action by the Company Board in order for any such anti-takeover statute to be inapplicable to this Agreement and the Transactions.
Inapplicability of Anti-takeover Statutes. The board of directors of the Company has approved this Agreement and the Contemplated Transactions as required to render inapplicable to this Agreement and the Contemplated Transactions the restrictions onbusiness combinations” set forth in Section 203 of the DGCL and similar “fair price,” “moratorium,” “control share acquisition,” “interested stockholder,” “business combination” or similar restrictions set forth in any state takeover law or other Legal Requirement that might otherwise apply to the Tender and Support Agreement, the Offer, the Merger or any of the other Contemplated Transactions.
Inapplicability of Anti-takeover Statutes. The Board of Directors of Parent has taken and will take all actions necessary to ensure that the restrictions applicable to business combinations contained in the DGCL are, and will be, inapplicable to the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement and to the consummation of the Merger and the Transactions.
Inapplicability of Anti-takeover Statutes. No takeover statute or similar Law applies or purports to apply to the Merger, this Agreement, or any of the other Contemplated Transactions.
Inapplicability of Anti-takeover Statutes. The AMMA Board of Directors has taken and will take all actions necessary to ensure that the restrictions applicable to business combinations contained in Section 203 of the DGCL are, and will be, inapplicable to the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement and to the consummation of Contemplated Transactions. No other state takeover statute or similar Legal Requirement applies or purports to apply to the Exchange, this Agreement or any of the other Contemplated Transactions.
Inapplicability of Anti-takeover Statutes. The restrictions applicable to business combinations contained in Section 203 of the DGCL are not, and will not be, applicable to the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement and to the consummation of the Merger. No other state takeover statute or similar Law applies or purports to apply to the Merger or this Agreement.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Inapplicability of Anti-takeover Statutes. The restrictions applicable to business combinations contained in Section 180.1141 of the WBCL are not, and will not be, applicable to the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement and to the consummation of the Offer and the Merger. The Company Board has, at a meeting duly called and held prior to the execution of this Agreement specified that at and following the Acceptance Time the provisions of Section 180.1150 of the WBCL will not apply to any of the outstanding Shares, including any Shares held by Parent, Purchaser or any other Affiliate of Parent, which action and resolution have not been subsequently rescinded, modified or withdrawn in any way. No other state takeover statute or similar Law applies or purports to apply to the Offer, the Merger or this Agreement. The Company is not a “target company” as defined in Section 552.01(6) of the Wisconsin Statutes.
Inapplicability of Anti-takeover Statutes. The Company Board has taken, or during the Pre-Closing Period (as defined in Section 4.1) the Company Board will take, all actions necessary to ensure that the restrictions applicable to business combinations contained in Section 203 of the DGCL are not, and will not be, applicable to the execution, delivery or performance of this Agreement, the Support Agreements or the Rights Agreement Amendment or to the consummation of the Merger. The Company Board has taken such actions and votes as are necessary to render the provision of any “fair price,” “moratorium,” “control share acquisition” or other similar anti-takeover Legal Requirements or any anti-takeover provision in the Company’s certificate of incorporation or by-laws inapplicable to the Merger, the Rights Agreement Amendment, the Support Agreements or this Agreement.
Inapplicability of Anti-takeover Statutes. The board of directors of Xcyte has taken and will take all actions necessary to ensure that the restrictions applicable to business combinations contained in Section 203 of the DGCL are, and will be, inapplicable to the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement and to the consummation of the Stock Purchase. No other state takeover statute or similar Legal Requirement applies or purports to apply to the Stock Purchase, this Agreement, the Xcyte Stockholder Voting Agreements or the Stock Purchase.
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.