Further Recommendations. Instructions for completing Attachment F Final Project Report Form: DEP AGREEMENT NO.: This is the number on your grant agreement. GRANTEE NAME: Enter the name of the grantee’s agency. PROJECT TITLE: Enter the title shown on the first page of the grant agreement. MONTH & YEAR: Enter month and year of publication The final Project Report must contain the following sections: Executive Summary, Methodology, Outcome, and Further Recommendations. The Final Project Report must comply with the publication requirements in the grant agreement. Please limit the final project report to no more than five (5) pages. One electronic copy shall be submitted to the Department’s Grant Manager for approval. Final payment will be held until receipt and approval of the Final Project Report. Questions regarding completion of the Final Project Report should be directed to the Department’s Grant Manager, identified in paragraph 18 of this agreement. Florida Department of Environmental Protection EXHIBIT G PHOTOGRAPHER RELEASE FORM FOR PHOTOGRAPHS, VIDEOS, AUDIO RECORDINGS AND ARTWORKS DEP AGREEMENT NO: 22PLN83 RELEASE FORM FOR PHOTOGRAPHS, VIDEOS, AUDIO RECORDINGS AND ARTWORKS Owner/Submitter’s Name: Address: City: State: Zip: Phone Number: ( ) Email: License and Indemnification I certify that I am the owner of the photograph(s), video(s), audio recording(s) and/or artwork(s) being submitted and am eighteen (18) years of age or older. I hereby grant to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection the royalty-free and non-exclusive right to distribute, publish and use the photograph(s), video(s), audio recording(s) and art work(s) submitted herewith (the “Work”) to promote the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Uses may include, but are not limited to:
Further Recommendations. The study was restricted mainly by the recourses available and the limited time. Some suggestions are proposed for the future work. Coding work: This part is carried out based on the understanding of some accident reports and might be aspects which were omitted. A more correct structure will help a better coding of lifeboat accidents and provide useful information for the later work. Bayesian Network Development: Up to now, there is no available statistics on lifeboat accidents. Hence, no further lifeboat accident rates of different causal factors can be estimated. The causal relationships were only based on the subjective judgment. More detailed BBNs could be constructed assisting with more variables. By realizing this, a better understanding of what actually are the dominating factors that influence the lifeboat safety could be determined. Variable States: For the simple calculation, variable states were restricted to only three conditions- negative, no influence and positive. In the actual case, results would be quite different if we adjust or add the variable states. As a fact of this, the 6 variable states which were mentioned in the reference article could be accepted. Concurrently, a higher requirement for coding the accident data. Quantitative Analysis of Human and Organizational Factors: The last chapter has already proposed a structure for classifying and analyzing human factors. Some of the researches also proposed different methods to give quantitative analysis of human factors. A similar study could also be conducted. REFERENCES
Further Recommendations. Describe any future plans to build on the project, monitor project benefits. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING FINAL PROJECT REPORT FORM GRANTEE NAME: Enter the name of the grantee’s agency. PROJECT TITLE: Enter the Title shown on the first page of the grant agreement. NOAA AWARD NUMBER: Enter the NOAA award number as shown on the first page of the grant agreement. MONTH & YEAR: Enter month and year of publication.
Further Recommendations. ● The committee concluded that the context of historic arches in Portsmouth is not necessarily the strongest argument for an arch as many were temporary, and even the more permanent looking ones are no longer standing. Creating dynamic spaces, connecting neighborhoods, improving pedestrian and vehicle traffic flow and safety and enhancing aesthetics of downtown seem to carry more weight. ● We recognize and appreciate the level of expertise that Xxx Xxxxx brings to the project. It is a real advantage to have someone so knowledgeable involved. He brings skill in the areas of construction and presentation before the various boards and committees and an understanding of the nuances of working through the city’s approval process. It would be our recommendation that you maximize the advantage that offers, perhaps placing him in a visible role as a leader in some of the key presentations. It is common for a representative to speak on behalf of a client before boards and commissions-the presence of someone with Xxx’s expertise lends weight and credibility to the project and the fact that he is not directly tied to the arts organization would add a perceived element of objectivity to the overall proposal. ● In terms of the approval process with the City (HDC in particular), we believe that presenting the goals and thought process of the project will serve to be better than presenting a design that seems final. Dialog and a feedback process through a few work sessions will be important. ATTACHMENT 3 Summary Communication Regarding Historic District Commission’s Project Review ATTACHMENT 4 Proposed Partnership Description and Images Chestnut Street Streetscape Improvement A Music Hall/City of Portsmouth Collaboration An unwelcoming street leads to major city treasures Sidewalks always icy in winter because of poor drainage Both the Music Hall and the African Burying Ground are hard to find from downtown Heaving, pitched sidewalks Perilously placed utility pole Awkward access for pedestrians, school buses, and handicap patrons and cars Chestnut is a side street that is dark and dangerous for the 100,000+ residents and visitors that come to The Music Hall and use it as access to the African Burying Ground UTILITY POLE RESTRICTS TURNING OF BUSES AND DELIVERY TRUCKS The only existing site amenity – planter box / sitting wall View to residential parking; Utility pole Difficult sidewalks and access SLOPE STEP STEP FLUSH STEP FLUSH STEP The Music Hall as a partner with the ...
Further Recommendations. The study concludes with a series of recommendations, mainly summarising the main points of the analysis as set out above, but also highlighting three further issues that had been referred to in passing: • special care should be taken to ensure that indicators do not actually inhibit the effective implementation of policy; • although indicators must keep in line with the evolving policy framework, a certain amount of stability is desirable, if only to facilitate comparisons across the different time periods during which a policy is pursue; • it could be helpful to all concerned if a clear position were established on the extent of the resources that are available for evaluation purposes at the level of specific measures. This document contains the Final Report submitted by the Centre for Strategy & Evaluation Services (CSES) LLP in respect of the assignment: ‘Evaluation of the Indicators of the Entrepreneurship and Innovation Programme’. It provides an assessment of the general framework of indicators used by the Entrepreneurship and Innovation Programme.
Further Recommendations. After the discussion of the proposals contained in the Interim Report, it is now appropriate to formulate a final set of recommendations. These are as follows: • A distinction should be made in the elaboration of the indicators used for the EIP between the operational requirements for the effective management of the Programme and the grounds for developing a clear assessment of performance against the declared objectives of the Programme. • The current system is dominated by the former considerations and should be replaced by a system clearly targeted at providing a clear assessment of performance against the declared objectives. Proposed set of indicators and 4 recommendations • Any assessment of performance should make reference to the established evaluation framework and the classic evaluation criteria, in particular. • A statement should be made of the overall objectives of the indicator system, possibly along the lines suggested in section 4.1. • One of these objectives should be the clear communication of the achievements of the Programme, by way of discharging the requirements of accountability and addressing the legitimate interest of all stakeholders. • It could be helpful to all concerned if a clear position were established on the extent of the resources that are available for evaluation purposes at the level of specific measures. • A factor inhibiting a clear overview of performance is the sheer number of indicators currently being used. This number should be reduced. • The emphasis in the new indicator set should be shifted towards results and longer-term outcomes as opposed to outputs. • It is suggested that a series of overarching indicators be developed alongside those proposed, providing a context for the more detailed indicators, and reflecting issues that are at the core of enterprise and innovation policy. • Indicators should support policy implementation and development as part of an active evaluation culture. • Special care should be taken to ensure that indicators do not actually inhibit the effective implementation of policy.
Further Recommendations. The Committee reviewed other existing loaning practices within SCLS and made the following related recommendations: BULK LOANS In their investigation, the Committee learned that some libraries provide bulk loans of their own materials to other libraries. In such instances, the loaning library should create a separate card for each such library and use the patron category “bulk loan”. Such loans should be limited to materials owned by the loaning library. LINK EXPRESS A fee-based service managed by SCLS Delivery, this makes possible the direct delivery of LINKcat materials to schools, organizations, and businesses. Currently, each LINK Express customer uses Patron Category LINK EXPRESS which has the same limitations and restrictions as the ADULT patron category. It is recommended that o SCLS provide checkout data annually that identifies the number of LINK EXPRESS checkouts in that year to each LINK EXPRESS customer along with their taxing jurisdiction. The library within each taxing jurisdiction may add the relevant circulation to their annual circulation on their annual report.
