Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002c. Colorado pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus lucius) recovery goals: amendment and supplement to the Colorado Squawfish Recovery Plan.
Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002. Recovery plan for the California red-legged frog (Xxxx xxxxxx draytonii). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon. viii + 173 pp. [Service] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2004a. Recovery plan for five plants from Monterey County, California. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon. xii + 159 pp.
Fish and Wildlife Service. 1. Provide technical expertise and recommendations to the Biology Committee as requested (Grand Junction and Vernal field offices).
Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002b. Bonytail (Gila elegans) recovery goals: amendment and supplement to the Bonytail Chub Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Mountain-Prairie Region (6), Denver, Colorado.
Fish and Wildlife Service. (Service). KDWP may, on a case-by-case basis, request habitat management actions to maintain or improve habitat on the enrolled property. Examples of habitat management actions are listed in Section 8.3, Habitat Maintenance and Management Actions, of the SHA/CCAA Agreement. Include a description of the habitat management actions, if any, to be implemented on the property.]
Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002d. Razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus) recovery goals: amendment and supplement to the Razorback Sucker Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Mountain-Prairie Region (6), Denver, Colorado. Utah Division of Water Rights. 1994. Policy regarding applications to appropriate water and change applications which divert water from the Green River between Flaming Gorge Dam, downstream to the Duchesne River. Policy adopted on November 30, 1994, State Water Engineer, Robert L. Morgan. Valdez, R.A., W.J. Masslich, and A. Wasowicz. 1991. Dolores River native fish habitat suitability study: Annual Summary Report, 1990. BIO/WEST Inc., Logan, Utah. Valdez, R.A., and P. Nelson. 2004a. Green River Subbasin Floodplain Management Plan. Final Report of R.A. Valdez and Associates, Inc., to Upper Colorado Endangered Fish Recovery Program. Valdez, R.A., and P. Nelson. 2004b. Colorado River Subbasin Floodplain Management Plan. Draft Report of R.A. Valdez and Associates, Inc., to Upper Colorado Endangered Fish Recovery Program. Vaske, J. J. (1995). Knowledge, Beliefs, and Attitudes Toward the Endangered Fish of the Upper Colorado River Basin. Ft. Collins, Colorado State University: 91. Williamson, J.H., D.C. Morizot, and G.J. Carmichael. 1999. Biochemical genetics of endangered Colorado pikeminnow from the Green, Yampa, Colorado, and San Juan rivers. Final Report to Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program, Denver, Colorado. Williamson, J.H., and R.S. Wydoski. 1994. Genetic Management Guidelines. Upper Colorado River Endangered Recovery Program, Denver, Colorado. Wydoski, R. S. 1994. Coordinated Hatchery Facility Plan: Need for Captive- Reared Endangered Fish and Propagation Facilities. Denver, CO, US Fish and Wildlife Service. Wydoski, R.S. 1995. Genetics management plan. Upper Colorado River Endangered Recovery Program, Denver, Colorado. APPENDIX: CRITICAL HABITAT ANALYSIS
Fish and Wildlife Service. The mission of the FWS is to work with others to conserve, protect, manage, and enhance fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people. The FWS Migratory Bird Program serves as a focal point in the United States for policy development and strategic planning, program implementation, and evaluation of actions designed to conserve migratory birds and their habitats. The FWS is legally mandated to implement the conservation provisions of the MBTA, which include responsibilities for managing bird populations; domestic and international coordination; and the development and enforcement of regulations. The Migratory Bird Conservation Act and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act mandate migratory bird habitat conservation, which includes habitat protection through acquisition, enhancement, and/or management to avoid and minimize impacts. FWS programs that involve bird conservation activities include:
Fish and Wildlife Service except that grazing the aforesaid lands is permitted at any time throughout the calendar year without approval in writing.
Fish and Wildlife Service. 2004b. Determination of threatened status for the California tiger salamander; and special rule exemption for existing routine ranching activities; final rule. Federal Register 69:47212-47248 [Service] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2006. Xxxxx’x blue butterfly (Euphilotes enoptes smithi) 5-year review: summary and evaluation. Sacramento, California. 26 pp. [Service] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2009. Piperia yadonii (Xxxxx’x piperia) 5-year review: summary and evaluation. Ventura, California. 15 pp.
Fish and Wildlife Service. The mission of the FWS is to work with others to conserve, protect, manage, and enhance fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people. The FWS is legally mandated to implement the conservation provisions of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, which includes responsibilities for population management (e.g., monitoring), international coordination, and regulations development and enforcement. The Migratory Bird Conservation Act and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act provide for habitat conservation mandates that include habitat protection (e.g., acquisition, enhancement, and modification of habitats). Many FWS programs are involved in bird conservation activities, including:
