Ethics Review Sample Clauses

Ethics Review. The final study protocol, including the final version of the ICF, must be approved or given a favorable opinion in writing by an IRB or IEC as appropriate. The Investigator must submit written approval to Sage Therapeutics or designee before he or she can enroll any subject into the study. The Principal Investigator is responsible for informing the IRB or IEC of any amendment to the protocol in accordance with local requirements. In addition, the IRB or IEC must approve all advertising used to recruit subjects for the study. The protocol must be re-approved by the IRB or IEC upon receipt of amendments and annually, as local regulations require. The Principal Investigator is also responsible for providing the IRB with reports of any reportable serious adverse drug reactions from any other study conducted with the investigational product. Sage Therapeutics or designee will provide this information to the Principal Investigator. Progress reports and notifications of serious adverse drug reactions will be provided to the IRB or IEC according to local regulations and guidelines.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Ethics Review. I first submitted a REMAS ethics review in January of 2017 under the guidance of Xxxx Xxxxxx. We determined the process to be minimal risk because:
Ethics Review. The final study protocol, including the final version of the Informed Consent Form, must be given a written and dated approval or favorable opinion by an IRB or IEC as appropriate. The investigator must obtain and document approval before he or she can enroll any participant into the study. The IRB or IEC must supply to the sponsor a list of the IRB/IEC membership and a statement to confirm that the IRB/IEC is organized and operates according to GCP and applicable laws and regulations. The principal investigator is responsible for informing the IRB or IEC of any amendment to the protocol in accordance with local requirements. In addition, the IRB or IEC must approve all advertising used to recruit participants for the study. The protocol must be re-approved by the IRB or IEC upon receipt of amendments and annually, as local regulations require. The principal investigator is also responsible for providing the IRB or IEC with reports of any reportable serious adverse drug reactions from any other study conducted with the investigational product. Sage Therapeutics will provide this information to the principal investigator. Progress reports and notifications of serious adverse drug reactions will be provided to the IRB or IEC according to local regulations and guidelines. In addition, the principal investigator must inform the IRB/IEC and sponsor of any changes significantly affecting the conduct of the trial and/or increasing the risk to participants (eg, violations to the protocol or urgent safety measures taken for participant safety).
Ethics Review. The Agency carries out the ethics pre-screening and the screening of proposals, according to Horizon 2020 Vademecum23. If an ethic assessment is necessary, further to the screening, the Agency will request the Ethics Department of DG RTD to perform it. In exceptional cases, such an assessment may also be carried out at the request of the Commission services or the Agency notably via the Horizon 2020 SEP system. In case of complaints on ethics, the Agency convenes a committee according to the relevant provisions provided in the Horizon 2020 Vademecum.‌
Ethics Review. The final study protocol, including the final version of the informed consent form, must be approved or given a favorable opinion in writing by an IRB/IEC as appropriate. The Investigator must submit written approval to La Jolla before he or she can enroll any patient into the study. The Investigator is responsible for informing the IRB/IEC of any amendment to the protocol in accordance with local requirements. In addition, the IRB/IEC must approve all advertising used to recruit patients for the study, if applicable. The protocol must be re-approved by the IRB/IEC upon receipt of amendments and annually, as local regulations require. The Investigator is also responsible for providing the IRB with reports of any reportable serious adverse drug reactions from any other study conducted with the investigational product. La Jolla will provide this information to the Investigator. Progress reports and notifications of serious adverse drug reactions will be provided to the IRB/IEC according to local regulations and guidelines.
Ethics Review. The final study protocol and the final version of the ICF, and other study related material, as appropriate, must be approved or given a favorable opinion in writing by an IRB or IEC as appropriate. The Principal Investigator must submit written approval to RIBOMIC (or designee) before study initiation. See Appendix 1 for a list of obligations of Investigators. The Principal Investigator is responsible for informing the IRB or IEC of any amendment to the protocol in accordance with local regulations and guidelines. In addition, the IRB or IEC must approve all advertising used to recruit subjects for the study. The protocol must be re-approved by the IRB or IEC upon receipt of amendments and at least annually. The Principal Investigator is also responsible for providing the IRB or IEC with progress reports and notifications of any reportable SAEs attributable to the investigational product.

Related to Ethics Review

  • BUSINESS REVIEWS Supplier must perform a minimum of one business review with Sourcewell per contract year. The business review will cover sales to Participating Entities, pricing and contract terms, administrative fees, sales data reports, performance issues, supply issues, customer issues, and any other necessary information.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

  • Claims Review The IRO shall perform the Claims Review annually to cover each of the five Reporting Periods. The IRO shall perform all components of each Claims Review.

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES A. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by AGREEMENT, shall be reviewed by LOCAL AGENCY’S Chief Financial Officer.

  • Business Review Meetings In order to maintain the relationship between the Department and the Contractor, each quarter the Department may request a business review meeting. The business review meeting may include, but is not limited to, the following: • Successful completion of deliverables • Review of the Contractor’s performance • Review of minimum required reports • Addressing of any elevated Customer issues • Review of continuous improvement ideas that may help lower total costs and improve business efficiencies.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.