Differentiating Disciplinary Misconduct from Criminal Offenses Sample Clauses

Differentiating Disciplinary Misconduct from Criminal Offenses. School administrators and personnel are responsible for school discipline. Although SROs are expected to be familiar with the school division code of student conduct, the rules of individual schools, and their application in day-to-day practice, SROs should not be involved with the enforcement of school rules or disciplinary infractions that are not violations of law. Consequences of student misconduct should be effective, developmentally appropriate, and fair. Interventions and school sanctions should help students learn from their mistakes and address root causes of misconduct. School administrators should consider alternatives to suspensions and expulsions and law enforcement officials should consider alternatives to involvement with the juvenile and criminal justice systems for student violations of law.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Differentiating Disciplinary Misconduct from Criminal Offenses. School administrators and teachers are responsible for school discipline. Although SROs are expected to be familiar with the school division code of student conduct, the rules of individual schools, and their application in day-to-day practice, SROs should not be involved with the enforcement of school rules or disciplinary infractions that are not violations of law. Consequences of student misconduct should be effective, developmentally appropriate, and fair. Interventions and school sanctions should help students learn from their mistakes and address root causes of misconduct. School administrators will consider alternatives to suspensions and law enforcement officials will consider alternatives to referrals to juvenile court services and arrests for violations of law. The SLEP shall operate in a manner to ensure children with disabilities receive appropriate behavioral interventions and supports.
Differentiating Disciplinary Misconduct from Criminal Offenses. School administrators and teachers are responsible for school discipline. Although SROs are expected to be familiar with the school division code of student conduct, the rules of individual schools, and their application in day-to-day practice, SROs should not be involved with the enforcement of school rules or disciplinary infractions that are not violations of law. Consequences of student misconduct should be effective, developmentally appropriate, and fair. Interventions and school sanctions should help students learn from their mistakes and address root causes of misconduct. School administrators will consider alternatives to suspensions and law enforcement officials will consider alternatives to referrals to juvenile court services and arrests for student violations of law. This Agreement, the School Law Enforcement Partnership Guide, and any relevant guidance from the Department of Criminal Justice Services with regard to SROs are all intended to operate in a manner to ensure children with disabilities receive appropriate behavioral interventions and supports. When appropriate, and to the extent the law allows, the Board should notify SROs of any special needs of a student involved in a school-based infraction that is not routine discipline, in order to assist the SRO in recognizing and accommodating behaviors that may be manifestations of the student’s disability. In accordance with School Board Policy JB, any action taken in response to disciplinary misconduct and/or criminal offense will be administered fairly and without regard to race, national origin, disability, religion, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation or marital or parental status. Information Sharing The release of student records is governed by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), 20 U.S.C. §1232g, and the associated regulations of the U.S. Department of Education as well as Virginia’s student privacy statutes, Virginia Code Sections 22.1-287 et seq., as amended. “School officials” may access and disclose student records only as authorized by XXXXX, its associated Federal regulations and the Virginia Code. In any case of conflict between Virginia law and Federal law, Federal law shall prevail. Consent access. An SRO or other law enforcement officer may have access to a student’s education records with written consent of the student’s parent or of the student if the student is age 18 or older. SRO access. For purposes of access to student records, SR...
Differentiating Disciplinary Misconduct from Criminal Offenses. School administrators and teachers are responsible for school discipline. SROs are expected to be familiar with the school division code of student conduct, the Fairfax County Student Rights and Responsibilities document, the rules of individual schools, and their application in day-to-day practice. However, SROs shall not be involved with the enforcement of school rules or disciplinary infractions that are not violations of law. SROs will consider alternatives to juvenile petitions.
Differentiating Disciplinary Misconduct from Criminal Offenses. School administrators and teachers are responsible for school discipline and the enforcement of school rules and procedures. CCPS will ensure SROs are familiar with the school division code of student conduct, the rules of individual schools, and their application in day-to-day practice, but in the absence of emergency and/or criminal conduct, SROs should not be involved with the enforcement of school rules or disciplinary infractions that are not violations oflaw. Information Sharing The release of student "education records" is governed by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), 20 U.S.C. §1232g. "School officials" may access and disclose student "education records" only as authorized by XXXXX. SROs are not School Officials but work in conjunction with School Officials and as a part of this MOU will have access to the information as noted in APPENDIX A. Disclosure Statement: CCPS and CCPD will adhere to all state and federal laws/guidelines regarding disclosure of information. GAGGLE Information Sharing Protocol: CCPS has implemented GAGGLE safety management technology that reveals potentially harmful content in student email, documents, shared files, images stored in CCPS school issued student cloud drives. CCPS may disclose to SROs and law enforcement personally identifiable information, including student addresses, telephone numbers, and email addresses, of any student without prior written consent of the parent, and without a Court Order, if the GAGGLE safety management technology reveals potential harmful content that constitutes a safety or health emergency. A health or safety emergency would include, but is not limited to, content that indicates self-harm or harm to others, and the notification of images containing nudity/sexual content of aminor. Investigation and Questioning The operations of schools are governed by policies adopted by the school board.1 Furthermore, school principals are responsible for protecting and maximizing instructional time; and controlling and monitoring interruptions disruptions during the school day.2 SROs and law enforcement officers conducting investigations shall be allowed in collaboration with any local Child Protective Services unit shall, in accordance with Va. Code §63.2-1518 state law, be allowed to question a students suspected of being abused or neglected and that student’s sibling(s) outside the presence of school officials, and without the consent or presence of the student's parent or guar...

Related to Differentiating Disciplinary Misconduct from Criminal Offenses

  • Convicted, Discriminatory, Antitrust Violator, and Suspended Vendor Lists In accordance with sections 287.133, 287.134, and 287.137, F.S., the Contractor is hereby informed of the provisions of sections 287.133(2)(a), 287.134(2)(a), and 287.137(2)(a), F.S. For purposes of this Contract, a person or affiliate who is on the Convicted Vendor List, the Discriminatory Vendor List, or the Antitrust Violator Vendor List may not perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under the Contract. The Contractor must notify the Department if it or any of its suppliers, subcontractors, or consultants have been placed on the Convicted Vendor List, the Discriminatory Vendor List, or the Antitrust Violator Vendor List during the term of the Contract. In accordance with section 287.1351, F.S., a vendor placed on the Suspended Vendor List may not enter into or renew a contract to provide any goods or services to an agency after its placement on the Suspended Vendor List. A firm or individual placed on the Suspended Vendor List pursuant to section 287.1351, F.S., the Convicted Vendor List pursuant to section 287.133, F.S., the Antitrust Violator Vendor List pursuant to section 287.137, F.S., or the Discriminatory Vendor List pursuant to section 287.134, F.S., is immediately disqualified from Contract eligibility.

  • FLORIDA CONVICTED/SUSPENDED/DISCRIMINATORY COMPLAINTS By submission of an offer, the respondent affirms that it is not currently listed in the Florida Department of Management Services Convicted/Suspended/Discriminatory Complaint Vendor List.

  • Consideration of Criminal History in Hiring and Employment Decisions 10.14.1 Contractor agrees to comply fully with and be bound by all of the provisions of Chapter 12T, “City Contractor/Subcontractor Consideration of Criminal History in Hiring and Employment Decisions,” of the San Francisco Administrative Code (“Chapter 12T”), including the remedies provided, and implementing regulations, as may be amended from time to time. The provisions of Chapter 12T are incorporated by reference and made a part of this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. The text of the Chapter 12T is available on the web at xxxx://xxxxx.xxx/olse/fco. Contractor is required to comply with all of the applicable provisions of 12T, irrespective of the listing of obligations in this Section. Capitalized terms used in this Section and not defined in this Agreement shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in Chapter 12T.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.