DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION. On December 20, 2006, Plaintiff Xxxxx Xxxxx (together with Frenchola Holden and Xxxxx XxXxxxxx) (collectively, the “Named Plaintiffs”) filed this Action against Defendants GMAC Mortgage, LLC (“GMAC Mortgage”), GMAC Bank (now known, and hereinafter referred to, as Ally Bank), and Cap Re of Vermont, LLC (“Cap Re”) (collectively, “Defendants”) (Defendants together with the Named Plaintiffs, the “Parties”). The Action was filed as a proposed class action. Named Plaintiffs allege that the portions of the mortgage insurance premiums that certain non-party private mortgage insurance providers ceded to Cap Re were disguised kickbacks paid for the referral of private mortgage insurance business. Named Plaintiffs allege that Defendants’ conduct violated Section 8 of the federal Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, 12 U.S.C. §§ 2601 et seq. On May 14, 2012, GMAC Mortgage and certain of its affiliates (collectively, the “Debtors”) filed voluntary petitions for relief under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Bankruptcy Court”). Pursuant to an order of the Bankruptcy Court, the Debtors’ chapter 11 cases are being jointly administered and are styled In re Residential Capital, LLC, No. 12- 12020-MG (the “Chapter 11 Cases”). On July 3, 2013, the Debtors and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors filed that certain Joint Chapter 11 Plan Proposed by Residential Capital, LLC, and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (as may be modified, amended or supplemented from time to time, the “Chapter 11 Plan”). On November 19, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court commenced a hearing in connection with confirmation of the Chapter 11 Plan. A copy of the Chapter 11 Plan and related documents is available at xxxxxx.xxx/xxxxxx. Defendants deny all of Named Plaintiffs’ claims and deny any wrongdoing and any liability to Named Plaintiffs or any Class Members, in any amount. Defendants contend that Named Plaintiffs’ claims have no merit and that Defendants would prevail in the Action. Class Counsel have investigated the facts and the applicable law regarding the matters raised in the Action. Class Counsel believe that the issues before the Court are complex and are further complicated by the pending Chapter 11 Cases. Given these complications and the uncertainty as to the outcome of the Action, there is a risk that Named Plaintiffs could recover nothing. Absent the Settlement, the Chapter...
DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION i print format A4 landscape Estimated eligible 1 costs (per budget category) EU contribution A. Direct personnel costs B. Direct costs of subcontracting [C .Direct costs of financial support] D. Other direct costs E. Indirect costs2 Total costs Reimburse ment rate%3 Maximum EU contribution4 Maximum grant amoun 5t
DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION. The purpose of Work Package 6 in the SIMSTAT Pilot ESSnet1 is to evaluate the quality of statistics produced using exchanged dispatch micro data to assess the usability of micro data exchange in a possible future SIMSTAT setup. The Work Package has three objectives:
DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION. The grant awarded aims at implementing the activities as they are described in the application form: Submitted by: […] For the project whose title is: […] Registered by the Executive Agency under the reference: […] Having received the contract number: […] Any change to the activities needs to be explicitly authorised by the Executive Agency. ANNEX III
DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION. The Scientific proposal from the grant application. Includes Activity plan.
DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION. the FOLDOUT Website went only a few weeks after the Kick-Off Meeting Each partner will include updated information about the project and links to the central website to deal with the objectives reported below.
DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION. Give stakeholders and the public an overview of the project, benefits and pilot sites. This video initially planned for previous reporting period should come for the reporting period after the pilots start.
DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION. 2.1. Overall objective, specific objective(s), expected outputs and indicative activities The overall objective of the Action is to improve food security, livelihoods and wealth creation in sustainable fisheries and aquaculture, aligned with AU Agenda 2063. The specific objectives are the following:
DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION. 2.1 On July 25, 2006, Atmel announced that its audit committee had initiated an independent investigation “regarding the timing of Atmel stock option grants.” The investigation covered Atmel’s stock option grants between March 19, 1991, and August 3, 2006. In June 2007, Atmel restated its financial statements for the periods between 1993 and 2005 by approximately $116 million.
DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION. Title Title of the action Applicant Name of the institution/organisation responsible for implementing the action Other organisation(s) involved Names Time frame Start and end date of the action
