Decision Making Process of the Oversight Committee Sample Clauses

Decision Making Process of the Oversight Committee. All decisions of the Oversight Committee shall be made by unanimous vote or written consent, as indicated by the co-chairpersons of the Oversight Committee signing the written minutes thereof, with Codexis representatives collectively having one (1) vote and Shell representatives collectively having one (1) vote; provided, however, that in the case of a deadlock where unanimity has not been reached, the final decisions shall be made by Shell except with respect to (A) the approval or modification of the annual Milestone(s) for each Research Plan, the Year Four Goal(s) or the Year Six Goal(s), (B) the approval or amendment of any Research Plan, (C) the determination as to whether Milestones for the activities to be carried out under each Research Plan, the Year Four Goal(s) or the Year Six Goal(s) have been achieved, (D) the acquisition of Third Party rights pursuant to Section 7.1, (E) the determination to have any party that is a Third Party as of the Execution Date participate in the activities to be conducted under the Program, (F) the introduction of Third Party Information into the Program, or (G) any decision that has a reasonable likelihood of having a material adverse impact on Codexis’ business as conducted at the time of such decision or as contemplated to be conducted at the time of such decision. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, except with respect to the approval of the Research Plans, the annual milestones for the activities carried out under each Research Plan, the Year Four Goal(s), the Year Six Goal(s), and any amendments to any of the foregoing, the Oversight Committee shall have no authority to alter, modify or amend any of the rights and obligations of the Parties set forth under this Amended and Restated Research Agreement. If the Oversight Committee is unable to resolve any dispute, controversy, or claim with respect to items (A) – (G) above in this Section 2.3(f)(i) within thirty (30) days after it first addresses such matter (or such longer period as the Parties may mutually agree upon), then the dispute shall be referred to Executives of each Party. For purposes of clarification, all matters related to “technical aspects” of an approved Research Plan shall be resolved in accordance with Section 2.2(f)(i).
Sample 1Sample 2See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Decision Making Process of the Oversight Committee

  • Advisory Committee (a) The Partnership shall have a committee (the “Advisory Committee”) consisting of Fund Investors or their representatives or designees selected by the Managing General Partner; provided that no member of the Advisory Committee shall be an Affiliate of the Managing General Partner (or a designee or representative thereof). The Managing General Partner will meet with the Advisory Committee at least semi-annually to consult on various matters concerning the Partnership, including financial statements and appraisals, the status of existing investments and such other matters as the Managing General Partner may determine or any member of the Advisory Committee may reasonably propose.

  • Joint Remediation Committee If the Sellers (acting reasonably) determine that the Purchasers have committed a Major Default, then, at the election of the Sellers, within three (3) Business Days of the Sellers providing the Purchasers written notice of such determination, the Sellers and the Purchasers shall establish a joint remediation committee of designated executives from the Sellers and the Purchasers (“Joint Remediation Committee”) consisting of three (3) members of each of the Sellers and the Purchasers. The Joint Remediation Committee shall be responsible for overseeing the development of a mutually agreeable plan in accordance with subsection 3 below to either (i) remediate any breaches giving rise to the Major Default to the extent such breaches can be remediated and/or (ii) prevent similar breaches from recurring in the future (clauses (i) and (ii), a “Corrective Action Plan”). Each member of the Joint Remediation Committee shall have sufficient authority on the part of his or her respective party to make decisions relating to matters reviewed by the Joint Remediation Committee, and shall be approved by the other party (such approval not to be unreasonably delayed, conditioned or withheld). The Joint Remediation Committee shall have access to Purchaser Personnel that are primarily responsible for the area of the business relationship (such as information technology, data security or regulatory) where the breaches giving rise to the Major Default arise (such Purchaser Personnel, collectively, the “Subject Matter Experts”). The Sellers and the Purchasers shall cause their respective members on the Joint Remediation Committee to, and the Purchasers shall cause the Subject Matter Experts to, act in good faith in connection with the development of the Corrective Action Plan.

  • Operating Committee 7.01 To coordinate the operation of their respective generating, transmission and substation facilities, in order that the advantages to be derived hereunder may be realized by the parties hereto to the fullest practicable extent, the parties shall establish a committee of authorized representatives to be known as the Operating Committee. Each of the parties shall designate in writing delivered to the other party, the person who is to act as its representative on said committee (and the person or persons who may serve as alternates whenever such representative is unable to act). Each of such representatives and alternates shall be persons familiar with the generating, transmission, and substation facilities of the system of the party he represents, and each shall be fully authorized (1) to cooperate with the other representative (or alternates) and (2) to determine and agree from time to time, in accordance with this agreement and with any other relevant agreements then in effect between the parties, upon the following:

  • Steering Committee Each Party shall name a mutually agreed upon equal number of representatives for the Steering Committee, which shall meet twice per calendar year, or as otherwise mutually agreed by the Parties. In the event that a Steering Committee dispute cannot be resolved, such dispute shall be escalated to a senior executive of each of Customer and Lonza. The primary function of the Steering Committee is to ensure the ongoing communication between the Parties and discuss and resolve any issues arising under this Agreement. In addition to the primary function described above, the Steering Committee shall also take on the following responsibilities:

  • Management Committee The Members shall act collectively through meetings as a "committee of the whole," which is hereby named the "Management Committee." The Management Committee shall conduct its affairs in accordance with the following provisions and the other provisions of this Agreement:

  • Joint Steering Committee [***] following the Effective Date [***], a joint steering committee (the “JSC”) will be established by the Parties to provide oversight and to facilitate information sharing between the Parties with respect to the activities under this Agreement.

  • Development Committee As soon as practicable, the Parties will establish a joint development committee, comprised of at least one (1) and up to two (2) representatives of Omega and at least one (1) and up to two (2) representatives of Acuitas (the “JDC”). One such representative from each Party will be such Party’s Workplan Leader. Each Party may replace its Workplan Leader and other JDC representatives at any time upon written notice to the other Party, provided, however, that each Party shall use reasonable efforts to ensure continuity on the JDC. With the consent of the other Party (which will not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed), each Party may invite non-voting employees and consultants to attend JDC meetings as necessary, subject to consultant’s agreement to be bound to the same extent as a permitted subcontractor under Section 3.1(i).

  • Decision-Making The JDC shall make decisions unanimously, with each Party’s representatives collectively having one (1) vote and at least one (1) representative from each Party participating in such decision. In the event the JDC determines that it cannot reach an agreement regarding a decision within the JDC’s authority, then, within *** Business Days after such determination: (a) for any matter that is not a Critical Issue *** shall have the final decision making authority on such matter; and (b) for any matter that is a Critical Issue, the matter shall be referred to FivePrime’s Chief Executive Officer (or designee) and HGS’ Chief Executive Officer (or designee) for resolution. If such executives cannot resolve the matter within *** Business Days, then the Chief Executive Officer of *** (or designee) shall have the final decision making authority on such matter. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Development Plan shall not be amended, without FivePrime’s prior written approval (which approval may be withheld in FivePrime’s sole discretion), to: (i) increase or materially change the nature of FivePrime-Conducted Trials or Other FivePrime-Conducted Activities; or (ii) require FivePrime to continue any FivePrime-Conducted Trial if FivePrime, in its reasonable judgment, decides not to continue such trial for any business, scientific, safety, efficacy, enrollment or ethical reason, provided that, in the event FivePrime so decides to discontinue such trial, HGS shall have no further obligation to reimburse FivePrime under Section 4.2(d) except with respect to costs *** INDICATES MATERIAL THAT WAS OMITTED AND FOR WHICH CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT WAS REQUESTED. ALL SUCH OMITTED MATERIAL WAS FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 406 PROMULGATED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED. already incurred by FivePrime prior to such discontinuation and any and all standard close out costs incurred thereafter, and HGS shall have the right to continue such trial by itself at its expense. When *** make a final determination under this Section 3.4, that final determination must be consistent with the terms of this Agreement.

  • Research Committee 2.2.1 Establishment and Functions of the RC. -------------------------------------

  • Collaboration Management Promptly after the Effective Date, each Party will appoint a person who will oversee day-to-day contact between the Parties for all matters related to the management of the Collaboration Activities in between meetings of the JSC and will have such other responsibilities as the Parties may agree in writing after the Effective Date. One person will be designated by Merck (the “Merck Program Director”) and one person will be designated by Moderna (the “Moderna Program Director,”) together will be the “Program Directors”. Each Party may replace its Program Director at any time by notice in writing to the other Party. Any Program Director may designate a substitute to temporarily perform the functions of that Program Director by written notice to the other Party. The initial Program Directors will be: For Moderna: [***] For Merck: [***]

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.